Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

When you don't have a 3rd, you don't want to lose value by cashing in 2025 picks this year, and you're looking to field a complete team (to include depth) rather than obcessing on a high WR pick.

Posted

I'd like to see them make 4 picks tonight. That could net 4 very good starters. 

Posted
10 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:

Very Beane like. I’m a fan if 2 to 3 of those picks from rounds two to five are WRs. Hoping pick 33 is Mitchell

Mitchell has Type 1 diabetes and does not take good care of himself, diet-wise. He can be tough to handle in meetings and it’s a chore to make him practice hard. 

Posted

By all accounts, this Draft is strong through 150 or so players and then drops off a cliff.

 

8 of our 10 picks are in the Top 160.  

 

From that standpoint, solid work in pick aggregation.. now need to put the picks to good use. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)

Send 7 5th rounders for JJ.  Easy. 

 

6 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

Logical, but emotionally devastating maneuvering. 

 

this really sums it up. It can really only backfire more than the potential to be amazing in the end. 

 

Edited by nedboy7
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I wonder if Arizona wants to come up to 33 for switching our 4th for one of their thirds.  We would only go back a few spots from 33 in the second. 

Edited by Lofton80
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Lofton80 said:

I wonder if Arizona wants to come up to 32 for switching our 4th for one of their thirds.  We would only go back a few spots from 32 in the second. 

Well since the next pic is ours at 33, that is impossible. But sure I'd go back form 33 a couple slots for another 3rd rounder.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, MPL said:

I'd like to see them make 4 picks tonight. That could net 4 very good starters. 

I wanna see Beane trade next years 1st to GB for: no. 41, swap 58 for 60 and no.88. To all the naysayers from when I previously suggested this, go back to last night.

Picking in the bottom 5 doesn't guarantee a pick worth the 5th yr. option.

 

Hell, I'd even move back to 35 if AZ. is willing to part with one of their 3s. I know it's behind the Pats, but I think there's a shot they trade with the Niners for Deebo anyway.

Posted
6 hours ago, In Summary said:

When you don't have a 3rd, you don't want to lose value by cashing in 2025 picks this year, and you're looking to field a complete team (to include depth) rather than obcessing on a high WR pick.

 

Reality that is outside the top few WRs each year, which we had zero shot a landing, we really have no idea which others will be any good in the NFL.  As long as they take at least 2 between rounds 2-5 i'll be happy. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Snappysnackcakes said:

Mitchell has Type 1 diabetes and does not take good care of himself, diet-wise. He can be tough to handle in meetings and it’s a chore to make him practice hard. 

When there's so much money invested into these guys I really wonder why  whatever NFL team wouldn't just hire a staff member who's only job is to make sure he's good. Seems like a good investment of 60k-70k

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...