LEBills Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Ralonzo said: Potential trade downs from 33 with equivalent Rich Hill chart value (like the 2 previous moves) 33 + 128 to Washington for 36 + 100 33 + 200 to Carolina (lol) for 39 + 101 33 to Washington for 40 + 100 33 + 163 to Green Bay for 41 + 88 33 + 163 to Houston for 42 + 86 33 + 144 to Atlanta for 43 + 79 (didn't double check what Buffalo already traded away... tired!) Washington makes the most sense. They can take spend the night deciding the best OT left and take him at 33. Though I think it was Russini that said the Texans were aggressively trying to trade up too.
DCOrange Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Still remaining from my big board at the beginning of the night for options I'd like: Insert OLine Here (probably just JPJ at this point) Cooper DeJean Jer'Zhan Newton Kool Aid McKinstry Troy Franklin Keon Coleman For those focused on WRs, my personal board: MHJ Nabers Odunze Thomas Keon Coleman Troy Franklin Jacob Cowing Ladd McConkey Javon Baker Ricky Pearsall Ja'Lynn Polk Adonai Mitchell Brenden Rice Roman Wilson Jermaine Burton Malachi Corley Xavier Legette Xavier Worthy Isaiah Williams Jamari Thrash Anthony Gould Devontez Walker Jalen McMillan The top 15 all had 2nd round or better grades, so long story short, plenty of options still available tomorrow. Among those top 15, I don't think Cowing and Wilson make much sense for us, though Wilson in particular has the type of DNA I think Beane would love. 2 1 1
JROC INTEL Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I honestly don’t know what’s going on or what to do at this point. I would have taken worthy or legette.
Big Blitz Posted April 26 Posted April 26 42 minutes ago, TFBillsfan said: I’m not mad about trading down but to trade with KC and not make them pay extra is beyond ridiculous! I bet they knew we weren’t taking him, called b.s. but we managed to work something out. They still had to worry if another team would jump them for him. The package even says they weren’t running thru walls to get him.
Ralonzo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) Expounding on the chart above they must have more than one guy in a tier to make a move down. If Franklin is their lone round 2 receiver, they will take him 33. Otherwise, they are doing the right thing dragging those late picks Beane has accumulated up into an are where players who can at least make the 53 are in this draft which is rounds 1 thru maybe mid-4 based on scouting, mock drafts, etc. What's happening looks like the plan that running triple digits mock drafts ultimately made plain was the best plan for the Bills. Aim for 4+ picks in the top 100, target: WR (Franklin?) Edge (Booker?) S (Hicks?) OT (Sumiataiaai?) DT (Hall? M Smith?). Use the R4 and R5 for your sleepers and fallers and devalued positions like WR and LB. Damned if it doesn't look like exactly what Beane is doing right now. Edited April 26 by Ralonzo 1
Dr. Who Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) 47 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said: The McDonkey dude isn't a difference-maker though. If he's the pick, we still need serious help at WR. Yes, he is, and it's McConkey. They should take 2 WRs day 2, regardless. They need an X and a Z. Edited April 26 by Dr. Who
HappyDays Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Beane presser now. Says they never tried to move up. Ben Allbright says they did. Someone’s lying I just finished listening to it. Everything he said makes sense and echoes what I said earlier in the thread. He basically admitted their 1st round grades were wiped out by the time it got to their pick. He said he never wanted to give up #60 in a trade up so that limited the trade up options. So once the 1st round grades were gone he started taking calls to move back. On trading with KC specifically - he pushed back on the notion that we gave KC the player they wanted. Said they could have just traded up with the next team down, or maybe their player gets to their original pick anyways. He said in those discussions he's just making the best decision for the Buffalo Bills, not worrying about the team he's talking to. Mentioned that he's even had those conversations with our division rivals. He said he had other offers to move even further back into the 40s or 50s from #28 but didn't want to go back too far. He planned on picking at #32 but getting to move up 59 spots on day three to move back one spot was too enticing to turn down. Also he didn't exactly come out and say it but he somewhat implied that the added draft value he got could be used to move up on the board again tomorrow. I won't be surprised at all if we pick at say #33 and #50, giving up our 4th perhaps to make it happen. Beane still has to be right about the players he drafts tomorrow. But his execution tonight makes a ton of sense. He explained himself well. Edited April 26 by HappyDays 3 5
Mat68 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Newton or Dejean. If they were targeting a wr they dont trade with Kc or Carolina. 1 1 1 1
iccrewman112 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 18 minutes ago, PBF81 said: The only significant change in that heap is the addition of the 95th. After 128th they're all 5th, 6th, or 7th rounders. Of those six picks, we'll be lucky to see three of 'em make the roster. Of the 25 picks that Beane's made from 128th on, only two have become starters besides Davis, whom few thought was good. Shakir and Benford, both from the '22 draft and both still with some TBD. Most of those 25 picks aren't even on the team anymore if they even ever made it to begin with. All 5th, 6th, and 7ths should used used to improve position in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks to ensure you get the player(s) you are targeting 3
gonzo1105 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I have said this for months, I prefer McConkey but Keon Coleman fits the DNA of the type of person they love and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he’s our first pick. People need to get over the 4.6. He is 20 years old and the Bills love taking younger prospects with upside 1 2 1
Tipster19 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 28 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I believe 13 of the last 15 drafts… #33 has been traded I wouldn’t count on anything this regime will do.
Low Positive Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 hour ago, LEBills said: Franklin is better than any WR that went after pick 9 imo I'm not sure that is true, but I do think that that the Bills think that. They did their work on him and Tez Walker. 1
Dr. Who Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: I have said this for months, I prefer McConkey but Keon Coleman fits the DNA of the type of person they love and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he’s our first pick. People need to get over the 4.6. He is 20 years old and the Bills love taking younger prospects with upside I still hate it. I'm not convinced he's a boundary receiver, and he absolutely is not a fella that's going to get you separation, which is what we need. I'd much rather end up with McConkey and Mitchell. Of course, if we take him, I'll hope for the best. 1
appoo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 44 minutes ago, DeepPass said: Definitely quantity this year. So many open spots all over the roster. Deal with it! Where are you seeing that? I'd love to upgrade one of the safeties, and add some depth at DLine, and of course another WR. The offense is going to be better than this past seasons 1
Low Positive Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: I have said this for months, I prefer McConkey but Keon Coleman fits the DNA of the type of person they love and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he’s our first pick. People need to get over the 4.6. He is 20 years old and the Bills love taking younger prospects with upside I liked him at MSU (I don't watch ACC football), but the lack of separation is a concern.
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I think we should be able to acquire another 3rd to move down a handful of spots if we include one of our many 5ths having 2 2nds & 2 3rds would be an impressive outcome after having only 60 for Friday
hondo in seattle Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 hour ago, iccrewman112 said: The trade with Carolina is a no brainer for many reasons. 1. You confirm with Carolina the player they are moving up to select is not the player you want. If it is then you don’t make the trade. 2. you move up about 60 spots from late 6th to high 5th. That is the 125 ranked player vs the 185. 3. the newly acquired high 5th rounder is a much more valuable trade chip to improve 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rounders. 4. The first pick in the 2nd round is often a highly traded pick as teams reevaluate their boards (since moving to the 3 day format), giving more trade down opportunities. This was a bad trade for Carolina. The fact we were willing to make the trade pretty much tells them we didn't want Legette. If we wanted him, we would have made the pick and not traded it away.
Low Positive Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said: This was a bad trade for Carolina. The fact we were willing to make the trade pretty much tells them we didn't want Legette. If we wanted him, we would have made the pick and not traded it away. Williams-Brice Stadium (where the ***** play) is 1.5 hours away from Bank of America Stadium. That played a huge role in their interest. 1
gonzo1105 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 50 minutes ago, LEBills said: Washington makes the most sense. They can take spend the night deciding the best OT left and take him at 33. Though I think it was Russini that said the Texans were aggressively trying to trade up too. I thought about the Commanders to but all the first round tackles went off the board in round 1 and they can probably get a guy by sitting at 36. Patrick Paul is probably the best available. If they don’t like him they can still take interior guys like JPJ and Frazier. I just think looking at it objectively they will sit at their picks
Recommended Posts