Jump to content

The Bills are on the clock: Pick 33


Process

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, LabattBlue said:

Very puzzling to give up the 5th year of player control for what?

The fifth year option on a WR isn't much of a price control anymore . That 5th year will probably be 30 Million by then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find myself largely agreeing with Joe Marino here, Legette at 32 would have been nice but if you told me before the draft we could move down 5 spots and get back in the 3rd round (and upgrade a day 3 pick) I would have taken it. If we wake up tomorrow with DeJean, Franklin and somebody else I'll be thrilled. I can get excited for Mitchell but I don't understand the McConkey love - maybe someone who watches more college football than I do can explain the appeal behind a guy with his mediocre production and good but not elite tools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am loving DeJean at this point.  A great fit in a number of ways.  We are short in CB depth, run 3 safety groupings with Rapp quite often, one injury away from disaster and Douglas leaving next year?

 

If we stay put DeJean and Wilson would be cool boss, but probably moving around.  

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we stick at 33, guessing it's DeJean.  I have him ranked #19 in the draft and he screams McDermott.  2 things I could see happening:

 

#33 DeJean

#45 (trade up from 60 using 2 of our 5ths) Franklin (I think he may last to 60 and the Bills spent more pre-draft time with him than anybody else)

#95 Baker or Burton (off field isses with Burton but the talent is very high)

 

#33 DeJean

#60 Baker

#95 Burton/McCallister/Rice

 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Why would they have done so already? He’s still there now. The goal of the draft isn’t to take your guy as early as possible. The goal is to take him as LATE as possible. 

It's a gamble because the Bills also have their eye on a player around #95. That seems to be where a big drop-off in talent occurs. I hope McConkey is the choice at 33. Watching video of him, his acceleration is amazing, and he can lineup outside, in the slot, pretty much anywhere. Only question about an undersized WR is the durability. Otherwise, I'd love if they'd get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

If we stick at 33, guessing it's DeJean.  I have him ranked #19 in the draft and he screams McDermott.  2 things I could see happening:

 

#33 DeJean

#45 (trade up from 60 using 2 of our 5ths) Franklin (I think he may last to 60 and the Bills spent more pre-draft time with him than anybody else)

#95 Baker or Burton (off field isses with Burton but the talent is very high)

 

#33 DeJean

#60 Baker

#95 Burton/McCallister/Rice

 

 

I think you are spot on.  I think they take Cooper and trade up from 60 to take Franklin.  I think they have wanted Franklin for months now.  I also think they will take another WR in 3rd, probably moving up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Why would they have done so already? He’s still there now. The goal of the draft isn’t to take your guy as early as possible. The goal is to take him as LATE as possible. 

I just think that his talent would have dictated he go round 1 if he didn’t have rumored concerns about effort/taking coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to imagine Beane will be aggressive on Day 2 and package some of the 4th and 5th round picks to move up.

 

Need to add starters at WR and S from the day two picks. Would love Braelon Edwards, RB, Wisconsin as a late 3rd round/early 4th pick.

 

Later rounds most likely addressing 

depth at DT, DE, IOL and CB

Potential rookie punter (Tory Taylor)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bills6969 said:

This is my dream scenario:

 

33 Dejean

60 Franklin/Coleman

95 Tez Walker

 

i don’t think Franklin will last until 60 so may need to trade up to get him

walker is undraftable according to analytics - one of the overrated receivers in recent years.  I like him too until doing research on him. Substitute Baker, McCafrey, Polk or Burton for Walker

 

A couple of sites I've looked at have McConkey as their #1 player available.

#33 McConkey, and

#45 Franklin or #60 Baker 

I would cry tears of joy. I'd bet Ladd gets close to 100 catches a year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Art in PNS said:

The fifth year option on a WR isn't much of a price control anymore . That 5th year will probably be 30 Million by then

 

Not sure what you are talking about.  Cinn will save well over 10 million with Chase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

walker is undraftable according to analytics - one of the overrated receivers in recent years.  I like him too until doing research on him. Substitute Baker, McCafrey, Polk or Burton for Walker

 

A couple of sites I've looked at have McConkey as their #1 player available.

#33 McConkey, and

#45 Franklin or #60 Baker 

I would cry tears of joy. I'd bet Ladd gets close to 100 catches a year

What stats? He had 700 yds 7 TDs only playing half the season at UNC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

I just think that his talent would have dictated he go round 1 if he didn’t have rumored concerns about effort/taking coaching.

As I’ve often said, people get WAY too hung up on which Round a player is taken in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:

AD Mitchell all day unless they don’t trust his work ethic. His film when playing hard is top 10 WR. If he’s off their board then Franklin 

 

If you assume that Franklin or maybe Coleman is the guy Beane covets, and I can believe that, then here's how I'd bounce around Brugler's Day-2 Mock (Athletic, paywall) picking guys he mocks within a few spots after the Bills pick, for positions of need.

 

Brugler:

#33 Adonai Mitchell

#60 Javon Bullard

#95 Malik Washington

 

Alternate: Alternately, in his mock Coleman goes #45 so a flip of #33 to Washington for #40 + #100 would get the Bills into position for that.

 

VERSION 1 - ***TRADE***  #33 + #144 to NYG for #47 + #70, giving Buffalo the desired target of 4 Day-2 picks.  

 

 >>> #47 Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon - Slight receiver with good enough speed and great underlying win-rate metrics.

Other Options: Kris Jenkins, DT, Michigan ; Jackson Powers-Johnson, G/C, Oregon ; Kingsley Suamataia, OT, BYU ; Maason Smith, DT, LSU ; Zach Frazier, G/C, West Virginia

 >>> #60 Javon Bullard, S, Georgia

Other Options:  ; Braden Fiske, DT, Florida State ; Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia

Or, a small trade-up (e.g. #60 + #163 to GB for #58 + #202) for Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State - The size and hammer of a SS and the range and playmaking of a FS.

 >>> #70 Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas - Athletic edge is still young and would greatly benefit developing in a rotational role.

Other Options: Ruke Orhorhoro, DT, Clemson ; Brandon Dorlus, DT, Oregon ; Cole Bishop, S, Utah ; Ja’Lynn Polk, WR, Washington

 >>> #95 Javon Baker, WR, UCF - If drafting 2 outside WR on days 1 & 2 is the plan, Baker brings what Franklin doesn't in physicality and beating press.

Other Options: Devontez Walker, WR, North Carolina ; Malik Washington, WR, Virginia ; Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest ; Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech ; Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami ; 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ralonzo said:

 

If you assume that Franklin or maybe Coleman is the guy Beane covets, and I can believe that, then here's how I'd bounce around Brugler's Day-2 Mock (Athletic, paywall) picking guys he mocks within a few spots after the Bills pick, for positions of need.

 

Brugler:

#33 Adonai Mitchell

#60 Javon Bullard

#95 Malik Washington

 

Alternate: Alternately, in his mock Coleman goes #45 so a flip of #33 to Washington for #40 + #100 would get the Bills into position for that.

 

VERSION 1 - ***TRADE***  #33 + #144 to NYG for #47 + #70, giving Buffalo the desired target of 4 Day-2 picks.  

 

 >>> #47 Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon - Slight receiver with good enough speed and great underlying win-rate metrics.

Other Options: Kris Jenkins, DT, Michigan ; Jackson Powers-Johnson, G/C, Oregon ; Kingsley Suamataia, OT, BYU ; Maason Smith, DT, LSU ; Zach Frazier, G/C, West Virginia

 >>> #60 Javon Bullard, S, Georgia

Other Options:  ; Braden Fiske, DT, Florida State ; Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia

Or, a small trade-up (e.g. #60 + #163 to GB for #58 + #202) for Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State - The size and hammer of a SS and the range and playmaking of a FS.

 >>> #70 Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas - Athletic edge is still young and would greatly benefit developing in a rotational role.

Other Options: Ruke Orhorhoro, DT, Clemson ; Brandon Dorlus, DT, Oregon ; Cole Bishop, S, Utah ; Ja’Lynn Polk, WR, Washington

 >>> #95 Javon Baker, WR, UCF - If drafting 2 outside WR on days 1 & 2 is the plan, Baker brings what Franklin doesn't in physicality and beating press.

Other Options: Devontez Walker, WR, North Carolina ; Malik Washington, WR, Virginia ; Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest ; Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech ; Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami ; 

 

I'd be worried That Franklin doesnt last to 47 and Baker doesn't last to 95

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 518Buffalo said:

I find myself largely agreeing with Joe Marino here, Legette at 32 would have been nice but if you told me before the draft we could move down 5 spots and get back in the 3rd round (and upgrade a day 3 pick) I would have taken it. If we wake up tomorrow with DeJean, Franklin and somebody else I'll be thrilled. I can get excited for Mitchell but I don't understand the McConkey love - maybe someone who watches more college football than I do can explain the appeal behind a guy with his mediocre production and good but not elite tools

Borderline elite footwork and top notch feints is why I like him

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...