Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: but wait!!! All the cap experts on here told me these things weren’t possible. Just like Diggs. & here we have an NFL scout talking about it….
Cray51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Freddie's Dead said: Except he's not. We didn't land a single extra pick, we simply moved up from Round 4 to 3 and up in Round 7. The quality of this draft isn’t its depth. Moving up in rounds is good value for this year
Low Positive Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I understand that he traded down because the Bills didn't have anyone left on their board with a first-round grade. But I hate the concept of "draft value." Draft picks don't play, players do. And as we stand right now, the Bills have a franchise QB and the worst WR room in the league. But my biggest source of anger is that Beane traded Diggs without a plan. That was a blunder. He should have done what the Bengals have done with Higgins, and told him "you have a contract so shut up and play." 1 2 1 1
The Helmet of Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Kirby Jackson said: Worthy is the same size as Devonta Smith. I don’t want that guy, and that skill set, in Andy Reid’s offense. If you aren’t concerned about that, we see things differently. This. I don't like the idea of taking an undersized WR. But I don't want Reid to have him. So you c*ck block Reid. Simple. 1
Jerboski Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Einstein said: But lose an entire year of cap savings. That part is left out. Ding ding the trade doesn’t make sense, neither of them do from a value standpoint 1
Bills Bud Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Beane panicked and needs to go with McDermott. If I’m Allen I ask for a trade 1 1
UKBillFan Posted April 26 Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, That's No Moon said: It's not a deep draft at all. That's why they are prioritizing moving their later round picks forward. We aren't selecting additional players this year, we are just getting to pick them sooner. If it were a deep draft they'd be adding selections. Rounds 6 and 7 are basically throw aways this year. There just aren't that many guys with draftable grades this year. I wouldnt be shocked if they move down again tomorrow. I'm disappointed that they haven't been able to add an additional 3rd and have only been able to do swaps so far. Maybe tomorrow is different but I'd guess it would be another pick swap. Maybe one of the 5s to a 4 now. Didn't the Bills get the Chiefs 3rd as part of the trade for 28? 1
Kirby Jackson Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Cray51 said: COULD YOU IMAGINE THEM WITH JOHN ROSS??!! He was worthy before worthy! wait, they did have him… and he didn’t even crack the roster speed isn’t everything He is nowhere near Worthy as a player. Worthy runs the route tree. I feel like I don’t need to get this far in the weeds because the comparison is lazy. Worthy is a good route runner with explosive playmaking. He is a great WR. John Ross ran a fast 40. They aren’t that close. 1 1
DapperCam Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, UKBillFan said: If the fifth year option was that important to the Panthers I wish Beane had turned the screws more than he did in return. I think it’s also possible Beane wanted to get out of the first round to buy more time to wheel and deal. If so, it was mutually beneficial. I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t end up picking at 33.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 26 Posted April 26 4 minutes ago, MarkKelso'sHelmet said: Exciting. Maybe we can get another fourth rounder! and swap 7s. If we somehow pull off three 2nd round picks and still end up with Troy Franklin, DeJean and any other WR you want to throw in there I'd call that a good draft. Not sure if they can draft three players in round two but they are working closer to that.
34-78-83 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Jerboski said: We didn’t get fair market value for moving up 4 spots in the first not to mention, it’s your rival so that should add even more to the price. I have no issue with a trade down, getting the return we got from the team we traded with is not nearly good enough… kc cannot believe we made that deal Yes we did in fact it was almost a dead even match. The value #’s differed by 1 point 1
LABILLBACKER Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said: With all due respect. We got the 2nd best QB in the league and we are worried about minimal cap space for the future? I'm disappointed we won't have a promising wr on a cheap 5 yr rookie contract. 2.5 M.... Whoopdeedo 1 1
Jim Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, par73 said: Bills won't stop helping Kansas City. Already got them a couple SB's with the Mahomes gift. Now, they have provided them a T. Hill replacement. One team I would never trade with-- the Chiefs. Just mind-numbing. And they leave the 1st round with no receivers-- in a round where 7 were taken. There are a lot of receivers in the draft, but I don't think anyone left is a potential #1 (maybe Mitchell-- but he doesn't seem ready to take on that role immediately). Really looking forward to the 5-7 round landfall the Bills have put together. You mean landfill right? Cuz apparently most of the end of this draft is filled with garbage. But at least we gots tons of picks!!
Big Blitz Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, BillsFan130 said: Bills have a great history of trading in the 1st round with the Chiefs and Andy Reid knows absolutely nothing about offence so I definitely trust the bills on this one.. They drafted Sky Moore the year they lost Hill. Rashee Rice seems like a quality human.
Bruffalo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Meatloaf63 said: Letting Carolina Have Legette screams of stupidity and let’s help my old team. 5th round picks yippie 🤦♂️ Take a chance on a possible offense maker not 5th round space takers. Bills save cap and clearly didn’t want Leggette over who else is available. The move makes a ton of sense. Now you have all day tomorrow to trade for a Vet, trade back again for a big bounty, or just take the guy you want on a cheaper rookie deal then the first round. Tons of advantages to making this move. 2 1
jkeerie Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said: If we are abdicating our picks to the Chiefs in order to save a mere $2.5M, then we are already done. We are not allocating our picks to the Chiefs. We traded back because we likely didn't have first round grades left on any players. Do we take Worthy to spite the Chiefs even though the Bills didn't want a 165 lb WR??? I don't think they made the move to save money. It's simply a practical bonus. We moved back because of value...and we improved our draft position in the lower rounds. We now have three picks tomorrow night instead of one. 4 1 1 2
jwhit34 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 26 minutes ago, Brandon said: Swapped a 6th for a 5th. But it is a move up from the end of the 6th to the top of the 5th so around 60 picks. That's essentially moving up 2 rounds. 3
Freddie's Dead Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Cray51 said: The quality of this draft isn’t its depth. Moving up in rounds is good value for this year We should have gotten two 2025 Day 3 picks. Then I'd be fine with the trade downs. 1 2
CaptnCoke11 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: but wait!!! All the cap experts on here told me these things weren’t possible. Just like Diggs. & here we have an NFL scout talking about it…. It’s rough reading hot takes on here from some of these tards 2 1
Jim Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, UKBillFan said: Didn't the Bills get the Chiefs 3rd as part of the trade for 28? And the Chiefs third is basically a 4th isn't it? Cuz it's the last *****in' pick of the third round? More genius from BBB. 1 1
Recommended Posts