The Jokeman Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: We must be trading for a vet WR Vikes only have 1,5,5 next year go get Jefferson We don't have the cap room for a veteran unless we make a post June 1 trade. Yet I can't imagine drafting a guy only to trade him a few weeks later.
Big Blitz Posted April 26 Posted April 26 It was always AD or Franklin - that makes sense. Completely disagree on Worthy 1 1
SirAndrew Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: We must be trading for a vet WR Vikes only have 1,5,5 next year go get Jefferson I’d like to think, but is the draft capital we collected really good enough to be useful in a trade? I don’t think so. 1
RiotAct Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: We must be trading for a vet WR Vikes only have 1,5,5 next year go get Jefferson are the Vikings going to pay his salary this season? Or can Beane do more creative restructuring… lol
major Posted April 26 Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, TOboy said: AD Mitchell and Ladd sitting there still. Personally hope we go Mitchell (high ceiling) and then double dip on day 2, but I’d be happy with Ladd. He’s kind of a slightly smaller Steph. Mitchell would be a steal 3
Cray51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: so let kc squirm and find another partner, or make them overpay Maybe the trade we received was in fact a premium…?
Mr. Wonderful Posted April 26 Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Watkins90 said: This will be the draft that cost Brandon Beans his job. You watch. What the heck are you talking about? He's had more success here than anyone since Bill Polian and you think he's going to get fired. LOL. He's getting more pics hoping he can hit on some of them. 2 2
DCOrange Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) Options at #33 for those that are purely focused on WR: Adonai Mitchell (majority believes he's the #4 or #5 WR in the draft even if I personally do not) My personal #5 through #9 WRs (granted one of them is Cowing who is simply not a fit for the role we need to fill) Brandon Aiyuk? #33 is roughly what the projected cost would be to acquire him and SF did just draft a WR at 31. We made some significant moves up the board while still having a guy available that most people preferred over Worthy/Legette anyways and several options that I personally prefer and that's just at WR. Edited April 26 by DCOrange 2
Ralonzo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 The Xaviers are regarded as having mid Day-2 grades. If Beane is right and they are reaches at the draft picks he traded out, where the Bills reap the benefits, and gets his guy anyway after being pushed down (and lower salary!) then we're not Worthy. Day 2 will tell the tale, but the talking skulls are killing Beane right now for trading out of picks used to pick players they are sure the Bills needed. 1
Dr. K Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Cuboirs said: The big fail here is not that we didnt get what some presume to be hall of fame college players. Heck every draft has steals. But what ki do see as a FAIL is letting K.C. the only team we cannot beat get exactly what they want. We did it with Mahomes and now with the fastest player ever to run at the combine. Just doesnt make any sense. So should the Bills have drafted him to keep the Chiefs from getting him? Because it was pretty likely the Chiefs would get him anyway. 1 1
DapperCam Posted April 26 Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, UKBillFan said: Let's be honest - the Bills didn't want either Worthy or Legette, but clearly called the Panthers bluff by saying they'd draft him if the Panthers didn't take 32. I disagree, the Panthers probably told the Bills who they wanted to take and the Bills weren’t going to take that player anyway. This deal was all about trading draft compensation for the 5th year option. I doubt anybody did any bluffing. 2
Success Posted April 26 Posted April 26 The Bills trading down makes sense. KC trading up for Worthy makes no sense. There is an excellent chance he would be there at 32 if they just stood pat. But because of Mahomes and McDuffie, I'm sure the national narrative will be "KC did it to the Bills again" for awhile. But I simply don't see the negatives here. If both KC and Buffalo stood pat, we probably both end up w/ the same WR's we're getting anyway. And they gave up draft capital, while we gained it. 4 1 2
Meatloaf63 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, beebe said: Ridiculous, if they wanted him we should have got more. 2 1
The Helmet of Posted April 26 Posted April 26 I do not hate the trade back in general. But not to the Chiefs. The only thing you should be saying to the Chiefs if they call is "go F* yourself." Don't let Andy Reid do anything he wants to do. WTF!!! 3
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Meatloaf63 said: No Depends on the 5th round pick lol. What if it’s a Matt Milano level player. Anecdotal but it feels like the odds of hitting on a pick plummet in round 6
Jerboski Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Beane got worked on these deals, both of them he did not receive equal value…. This organization is gonna waste Josh Allen, smh 1 3 2 1 1 1
NoSaint Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Cray51 said: Maybe the trade we received was in fact a premium…? It was not by any metric. no scale or historical comp shows that as higher than normal value.
sleeby Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Any moderators in here? Look, like, not one to grovel and such but am only a few points left in rookie status and did forewarn the site was gonna crash come pick 32 here during pick 28 lags. What say ya give me a bump? At least someone will leave this thread tonight with something to show.for it. 😁
ToGoGo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Mr. Wonderful said: What the heck are you talking about? He's had more success here than anyone since Bill Polian and you think he's going to get fired. LOL. He's getting more pics hoping he can hit on some of them. Destructive personalities.
Recommended Posts