Bangarang Posted April 26 Posted April 26 We went from trading into the top 10 for Odunze to trading back with KC to the last pick in the 1st round. Wild times 4 4
The Red King Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Why get the QB with a cannon arm a speed receiver to throw it to? 1
HappyDays Posted April 26 Posted April 26 11 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Wow. I hate that decision from Beane. Worthy isn't my guy necessarily but why are you giving the team you are trying to catch and surpass a guy they really covet in a position where they need help? Best I can say is that if we didn't take Worthy, he was probably going to be there at #32 anyways. If KC wants to give us the picks for the pleasure, by all means. It's crazy ballsy of course. Because if Worthy is a star, Beane will never live it down. I'm mostly okay with it though. 1
Ralonzo Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Virgil said: WGR is saying that the Bills might try to trade back again The value will be lessened courtesy the trade back to 32, unless they do a similar thing to upgrade later round picks to pick up the slack. 32 = 35 + 138 from Arizona 32 = 39 + 101 from Carolina 32 = 40 + 100 from Washington 1
Einstein Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, ndirish1978 said: I believe the Bills didn't want Worthy, saw who was picking after than and had a good idea who they were going to pick and realized the Chiefs were going to wind up with Worthy anyway so they traded and picked up a 3rd. Optics are awful for people who wanted worthy, but we obviously didn't want him. I dunno what else they could do, call around and ask everyone "hey we will trade out of the 1st and give you a sweetheart deal if you take Worthy?" I understand the frustration but you can't fixate on a single player when you don't know who the team wants. For what it’s worth, I didn’t want Worthy either. I believe he plays much slower in pads than the 40 time shows. But you just don’t trade with your nemesis. You don’t trade with the team that already took a HOF QB from you. You don’t trade with a team that has beaten you in the playoffs 3 of the past 4 years. You don’t trade with a team you’re trying to catch! I hate this so much. And all for a 3rd round pick? We better hope and pray i’m right about Worthy and he doesn’t turn into Tyreek Hill 2.0. If that happens and we gave up Mahomes AND Hill 2.0 … oofta. 1
Niagara Dude Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, PrimeTime101 said: Guys.. Get over that the pick was the chiefs.... we got a THIRD ROUND PICK! its a WIN.. and there are still GOOD Wr's on the field. You still had to give them a 4th so it was not just getting a pick, Beanne is overrated 1
What a Tuel Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, PauleeeWalnuts said: You don’t trade with the Chiefs, period. Bad enough they gave them the next Tyreek Hill Who says this guy is the next Tyreek hill? 🤣 1
Ta111 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Success said: First KC comments I read were along the lines of "Worthy would have been there at 32 - would rather have taken Mitchell." Might be a chess move by Beane. Won't know for some time. Worthy would definite been there at 32. So the Bills got extra compensation and didn’t give the Chiefs anything they wouldn’t have gotten anyway. I don’t understand those who are against this, unless you thought the Bills should have drafted Worthy, which would have been a big mistake.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Bangarang said: We went from trading into the top 10 for Odunze to trading back with KC to the last pick in the 1st round. Wild times What a time to be alive Lol
Warcodered Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Oh god Leggett was just given the kiss of death from Belichick.
Meatloaf63 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Cray51 said: So would you prefer the Bills take worthy to spite the chiefs, but can’t use him effectively and he busts, or take someone at 28 that would have been available at 32 anyway and not move up 30 spots into the 3rd round? If you can’t figure out how to use that speed to your advantage, you don’t belong coaching in the NFL.
NoSaint Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Cray51 said: So would you prefer the Bills take worthy to spite the chiefs, but can’t use him effectively and he busts, or take someone at 28 that would have been available at 32 anyway and not move up 30 spots into the 3rd round? honest answer, I don’t trade with kc there without a premium are you ok if mahomes throws to worthy to beat us in the playoffs next year? 1
Beast Posted April 26 Posted April 26 My gut is telling me the Bills are trading for Aiyuk and still taking a receiver as well.
FireChans Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said: I'm disgusted. The Chiefs?!? Abdicating to the Chiefs, again?!? Even if we get a guy I like at 32, and we will, I'm just sick of getting cucked by KC. Beane drafting a DB to cover (or fail to cover) the WR he just gave KC is like this era of Bills in a nutshell. 2
PauleeeWalnuts Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: Guys.. Get over that the pick was the chiefs.... we got a THIRD ROUND PICK! its a WIN.. and there are still GOOD Wr's on the field. You don’t help the team that’s been picking your pocket for three years!! 1 1
Nephilim17 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 KC was GOING TO GET SPEED WR ANYWAY: Worthy, Legette, or Mitchell. So all this drama is a little much. Who knows if any of those three guys will be good let alone great. And they were going to get one of them. They need a WR and they want speed. We couldn't stop them from taking one and they might have taken Worthy without the trade anyways. Relax. 2 4
Best Williams Available Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Bills gave KC Worthy to justify CB at the pick. “See, we had to!!!” 1
Recommended Posts