JaCrispy Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Funny how? When he says “funny” he means “effed up”…😉
Richard Noggin Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: If Kansas City calls you hang up, I’m sorry Nah you hand the phone to the most annoying intern and string em along while looking for a different/better deal
34-78-83 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Clowns, look at your own polls on who to take if you had your choice with the Bills staying at 28 or trading back? Worthy was what, 20% of the share? Now KC has him and we still pick 4 picks later and gained a 3rd rounder and its freakout time...smdh 1 1
Rigotz Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, The 9 Isles said: Even if he is right with the trade the optics is horrible, not worth it because of all the off season negativity. if he’s wrong KC destroys the Bills using this player at some point in the future. minimal gain for too much pain This is a loser mentality. Dont make a good trade because you’re scared your rival might pick someone they like? I’ve seen too much of this mentality. Act like we have one of the best QBs in the league and expect to win. 1
Mango Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, SirAndrew said: Here’s my issue, it doesn’t matter if we didn’t want Worthy. You don’t give Mahomes a speed receiver. It’s ok that Beane didn’t want Worthy, but there’s no way you take the risk of giving any help to Mahomes. Maybe the Chiefs draft Worthy at 32, but why be directly responsible for potentially watching Worthy catch deep passes against us in the playoffs? I just don’t get it. This. I will add that if you’re going to do it you absolutely don’t swap picks down the board. You give 28 and you get picks, multiple picks, back to you. I would feel a little better if it was - Bills give up 28 - KC gives up 32, 95, and 2025 3rd. Curious if BB thought KC was going a totally different direction? Do we just trade out of the first all together? 1
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, Lionel Hutz said: Might as well just trade Allen since this organization has given up. Unbelievable how they are pissing away the prime years of the best QB we’ve ever had. season isnt over yet 😉😉
benderbender Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Y’all do realize that KC was going to trade for Worthy with the next teams after us, right? We weren’t going to take him. So we got marginally better picks. 1 2
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, PauleeeWalnuts said: You don’t trade with the Chiefs, period. Bad enough they gave them the next Tyreek Hill Genius
HurlyBurly51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Meatloaf63 said: Yeah, who needs a receiver who’s FAF? Yeah, tiny football players have worked so well for us😒
Scott7975 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: They were going to get him anyway. Then why would they trade up if the Chiefs thought that?
LeGOATski Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Ralonzo said: I don't regard C as a pressing need for the roster. I don't think they'll go that way. It's a need and the right value
That's No Moon Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said: Could it be everyone's wet fantasy Xavier Legette? Going right in front of Carolina who he said wanted him at 33. If Carolina wants him that badly I'll take another 3rd to drop down a spot.
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, billsherd said: Worthy with Andy Reid is going to problem. it’s WILD we agreed to this trade 1
MasterStrategist Posted April 26 Posted April 26 To everyone getting upset, Beane knew who KC was drafting. He clearly didn't want Worthy there, against my wishes and others. Now it's time to see who we would have taken at 28 anyhow (and get better draft capital tomorrow). I'm not ruling out another tradeback either...
Iverwig Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Virgil said: WGR is saying that the Bills might try to trade back again I was thinking that’s probably what Beane would do in order to pick up more picks. Just means I stayed up for nothing.
TheWeatherMan Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Ralonzo said: They have to be using the Rich Hill chart. Bills give 227 points KC gives 227 points You would think KC would have to pay a premium when trading with their #1 threat in the conference. Beane is dumb AF for doing this trade. 🤦🏻♂️
OldTimer1960 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Virgil said: WGR is saying that the Bills might try to trade back again I can believe that and would kind of like that, depending how far down they would go.
Alphadawg7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, BeastMaster said: Let's be clear here...Worthy is no Tyreek Hill I wanted a deep threat to open up things, but there are other guys that can do what Worthy does We'll see if he holds up at the NFL level. History says these guys are continuously hurt, and he's as tiny as it gets Worthy 6/23 on deep balls. 5/21 on contested catches. He’s not that good of a deep ball guy. He fits KC short throw attack where they lead the league in throws near or behind the LOS which Worthy had 21% of his targets be screens and 40% of snaps in the slot. Worthy was always a terrible fit in Buffalo 1
Recommended Posts