Buffalo03 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 This is guy I want on my fantasy team this year. There are certain guys that produce EVERY.....SINGLE....WEEK and freaking kill me every time I go against them. St. Brown is one of those guys 4 Quote
SCBills Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Aiyuk and Higgins are both going to use 30M per as a starting point now. Jefferson might as well ask for 40M at this point. 4 Quote
mannc Posted April 24 Posted April 24 This is why I think there will be at least six WRs drafted tomorrow … 1 2 1 Quote
Logic Posted April 24 Posted April 24 I traded him from my dynasty team after his rookie year because I thought he wouldn't replicate that success in year two. I used the pick I got in exchange to draft.......Skyy Moore. I still think about it pretty much daily. 1 1 1 27 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted April 24 Posted April 24 And this is why I feel it's smart to draft the lower cost rookie WR (or 2). WR inflation is real 2 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Worth it. Everyone wanting a true #1 out of this draft better get ready to pay that. Just now, BuffaloBillyG said: And this is why I feel it's smart to draft the lower cost rookie WR (or 2). WR inflation is real If the guy we draft breaks put then 30 per year will be the floor for him starting year 4. He won't be content plating on his rookie deal. Quote
Low Positive Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Pretty soon, teams won't be able to afford vet QBs once their franchise WR is off of his rookie contract. 2 3 Quote
Virgil Posted April 24 Author Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, Low Positive said: Pretty soon, teams won't be able to afford vet QBs once their franchise WR is off of his rookie contract. With the way the cap is rising, 30 is the new 20 for receivers as 50 is the new 40 for QBs. It’s all relative 2 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 This is why you draft guys instead of trading for Aiyuk. If you thought Diggs was expensive 2 5 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted April 24 Posted April 24 4 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: Worth it. Everyone wanting a true #1 out of this draft better get ready to pay that. If the guy we draft breaks put then 30 per year will be the floor for him starting year 4. He won't be content plating on his rookie deal. Yes, but at least then there are viable options. Could trade him for high picks and start the WR train again. Could pay him, but even then it would take a year for the contract to kick in. Could pick up 5th year option (if first rounder) and use the franchise tag as well for a lower hit. But in any event, you're still getting those 4-5 years on much cheaper salary. Quote
DCofNC Posted April 24 Posted April 24 4 minutes ago, Low Positive said: Pretty soon, teams won't be able to afford vet QBs once their franchise WR is off of his rookie contract. After KC has PROVEN, you don’t have to have Elite WRs, the trend is insane. Look how many games Adams has helped the Raiders win after that massive deal. Look where the fins went with Hill, etc. ONE guy, maybe 15 opportunities a game cannot be taking 10-15% of the cap if you have a QB taking 20%, the way it’s headed, you have a QB at 50+, pair of WRs at 50+, TE at 20+. LT/RT at 50+ the rest of the line at 30+ and we don’t even have a full offense on the field yet. The math don’t math. Going this crazy over WRs is the wrong move. 1 Quote
Charles Romes Posted April 24 Posted April 24 16 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said: And this is why I feel it's smart to draft the lower cost rookie WR (or 2). WR inflation is real or even spending extra draft capital to move up to do so. You can buy a lot of high end free agents for 30. Quote
HappyDays Posted April 24 Posted April 24 It's getting to a point where teams should draft nothing but QB, EDGE, WR, or LT in the 1st round. Maybe a 3T if they're really sticking out. The value difference between those positions and the rest is just too high to justify anything else. 4 5 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted April 24 Posted April 24 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bangarang said: Brandon Aiyuk fist pumping right now. I figure it more like this: Edited April 24 by MrEpsYtown 1 1 Quote
MJS Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Receivers are becoming as cost prohibitive as QB's. Pretty soon you will need to choose which you want: a franchise QB or a franchise WR? You won't be able to afford both without handicapping your team. Quote
Lost Posted April 24 Posted April 24 58 minutes ago, Virgil said: With the way the cap is rising, 30 is the new 20 for receivers as 50 is the new 40 for QBs. It’s all relative So 25% inflation for QBs 50% inflation for receivers. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.