Jump to content

The Reliable Mainstream Media vs. The Alternative Scum


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Historical analogues:

- Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive

- Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative

- Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive

- Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative

 

Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason.

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Historical analogues:

- Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive

- Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative

- Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive

- Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative

 

Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason.

Sometimes?

 

There is always a reason.

 

Legacy media's bias has been well proven

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Sometimes?

 

There is always a reason.

 

Legacy media's bias has been well proven

 

Sometimes I think Finding can't possibly be this dumb and that he must be trolling.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Historical analogues:

- Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive

- Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative

- Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive

- Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative

 

Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason.

Only 89% negative, seems like he could do better. SAD.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

RELIABLE.

 

WaPo Editors: Yes, Biden's Inner Circle Hid His Cognitive Decline, But #YOLO or Something

Ed Morrissey

 

Give one cheer to the Washington Post editorial board for admitting what has become blindingly obvious. Deduct about 20 cheers for hiding this admission in a deluge of "special recognition" for Joe Biden in his resentful acceptance of the putsch that resulted in his sudden retirement. 

 

Not for a moment does the editorial board consider the implications or the breadth of this cover-up, nor even how selfish Biden had been all along to pursue a second term. Instead, it's all about Biden's "profoundly selfless" choice, as a contrast to you know who:

 

https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2024/08/21/wapo-editors-yes-biden-inner-circle-hid-his-cognitive-decline-n3793441

 

 

 

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta love how these alt media addicts are constantly pointing out that a MSM story has a misleading headline or buries the lede or some kind of journalism school error.

But does anyone bother to go back and check on the accuracy of the alt media nonsense?

Michelle Obama will be nominated. Kamala is just an interim figurehead. Or Bidenites will storm the convention and restore his candidacy.

They are so idiotic that no one bothers to even track it. Make a bizarro wrong prediction, it will be forgotten tomorrow. Like it never happened.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.  Someone took it personal the media was cought carrying the Dems water, again.  

 

 

Almost as bad as right after everyone saw how far Biden had fallen, while the media and it's psycopants told us he was sharp as a tack. 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Frank only parrots msm.
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...