Doc Posted August 14 Posted August 14 6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Do they ever? 4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Good one, Jon. 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Yeah, who cares about showing you can field tough questions/handle tough problems. Because world leaders will take it easy on her...
Orlando Buffalo Posted August 14 Posted August 14 5 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: There's no evidence! The NYT just confirmed what Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate was a factual statement? A real journalist might do background search and see if maybe that impeachment was pure political hackery.
Doc Posted August 14 Posted August 14 4 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: The NYT just confirmed what Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate was a factual statement? A real journalist might do background search and see if maybe that impeachment was pure political hackery. The more time passes... 1
The Frankish Reich Posted August 17 Author Posted August 17 Tarheel moving toward a new record, responding to himself with 6 consecutive posts. Sorry to interrupt. Please resume.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 18 Posted August 18 On 8/14/2024 at 11:41 AM, B-Man said: I was going to type "unbelievable" but sadly, it is not. Inflation is right sized now, I think. Plus it wasn’t the admins fault, though she’ll address it straight up like a boss, but if she doesn’t, it’s the economy stupid. (I don’t really think you’re stupid). 1
The Frankish Reich Posted August 19 Author Posted August 19 1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said: Historical analogues: - Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive - Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative - Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive - Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason. 2 1
Recommended Posts