Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Well in THAT case their 24/7 wall to wall coverage would be reliable, accurate and justified of course!

 

:lol:

 

 

I believe the MSM has always had some form of bias and editorializing in its communication and messaging to the public.  What was missing up until recently is an alternative view and source.  Something to compare it against.  So they needed to invent misinformation and disinformation.  And protect their previous monopoly on disseminating news and information to the public.  I marvel at how many of these independent sources have stories almost immediately while the networks have delays of hours or days on some of them.  Its like they have an extra step in the news delivery process to decide whether or not they should let us know about something or not let us know about something.  Basically, a censor or not censor step.  Who exactly gets to decide what we should know? 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I believe the MSM has always had some form of bias and editorializing in its communication and messaging to the public.  What was missing up until recently is an alternative view and source.  Something to compare it against.  So they needed to invent misinformation and disinformation.  And protect their previous monopoly on disseminating news and information to the public.  I marvel at how many of these independent sources have stories almost immediately while the networks have delays of hours or days on some of them.  Its like they have an extra step in the news delivery process to decide whether or not they should let us know about something or not let us know about something.  Basically, a censor or not censor step.  Who exactly gets to decide what we should know? 

 

Well in the case of the decision of whether or not to mass censor the Hunter laptop story we know for certain who made that call. 

 

The CIA.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Well in the case of the decision of whether or not to mass censor the Hunter laptop story we know for certain who made that call. 

 

The CIA.

As a lifelong member of the Washington establishment and beltway insider it was in the agencies best interests to have Joe Biden win the election.  So they lied knowing doing so had no consequences of any kind.  If the CIA and the Intelligence Community agencies aren't representative of the deep state or "the swamp" then what is representative?  Raise your hand if you still believe the elected civilian government of the United State is actually running the country?  You want democracy and want to elect establishment candidates to high office?  You can't have both. 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

So Finding were your msm sources reliable:

 

1. When they reported, in unison, that the Biden laptop was Russian disinformation 

 

Or 

 

2. When they admitted in 2022 that the laptop and the reporting was always authentic.

 

Which time were they reliable? 

 

:lol:

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

I'm sure that Finding Q by now has read all about this story based on COURT DOCUMENTS in reliable news outlets everywhere.

 

But just in case...

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Angry 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Maybe you should post this on a few more threads. I'm thinking "Bills WR room 2024" might be a good one.

Or hey, even start a new thread! Maybe something like "Latest Communist Anti-Trump Hoax Targets Stupid, Confusing Trump Ad."

Whatever. That was yesterday's Trump controversy. Time to move on.

 

So: how about a new thread about how the mainstream media is slanted because it has the audacity to actually quote Trump's own words?

 

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/video/trump-clean-comments-contraception-110459861

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Posted

Pay close attention, you might need to rewind a few times, and maybe you can discern the slight and nuanced difference in how the media covers certain people.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

“It is the press, above all, which wages a positively fanatical and slanderous struggle, tearing down everything which can be regarded as a support of national independence, cultural elevation, and the economic independence of the nation.”

― Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

 

30691._UX200_CR0,36,200,200_.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

“It is the press, above all, which wages a positively fanatical and slanderous struggle, tearing down everything which can be regarded as a support of national independence, cultural elevation, and the economic independence of the nation.”

― Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

 

30691._UX200_CR0,36,200,200_.jpg

interesting as they used mass media as one of the main tools of their propaganda efforts.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...