Tommy Callahan Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 Dems openly cheer on the fact the msm, fortune 500 and the elite donors create propaganda blitzes that target the uneducated and ignorant. The left. Act blue. Is the system. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 12:44 PM, Scraps said: Didn't JD Vance, running mate of convicted felon, adjudicated sexual molester, adjudicated persistent fraudtster and obvious snake oil selling conman Donald Trump call Trump Hitler? Expand Before ever meeting Trump he did call him names, since meeting him he has changed his mind. Didn't Harris call Biden a racist after meeting hundred of times and then join him in his policies? 1
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 1:59 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: Before ever meeting Trump he did call him names, since meeting him he has changed his mind. Didn't Harris call Biden a racist after meeting hundred of times and then join him in his policies? Expand JD Vance is a complete fraud. He wrote Hillbilly Ellegy as a memoir but he isn't from Appalachia. He sucked up the Peter Theil to run a venture capitalist firm, a common path of a Hillbilly. He started a non-profit to battle opioids but spent more on salary for his chief political advisor that battling opioid addiction. He was anti-Trump until he ran for senate and was mired in 4th place in the primary. He then sucked up to Trump figuring correctly that Magadonians can't think for themselves since they are a cult, ] And he read that right. As for what Harris might have said about Biden, who cares? Biden isn't running for office. On 7/28/2024 at 12:47 PM, Tommy Callahan said: Magadonians Dems openly cheer on the fact that Trump msm, fortune 500 and the elite donors creates propaganda blitzes that target the uneducated and ignorant. Expand Fixed that for ya.
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 4:01 PM, Scraps said: JD Vance is a complete fraud. He wrote Hillbilly Ellegy as a memoir but he isn't from Appalachia. He sucked up the Peter Theil to run a venture capitalist firm, a common path of a Hillbilly. He started a non-profit to battle opioids but spent more on salary for his chief political advisor that battling opioid addiction. He was anti-Trump until he ran for senate and was mired in 4th place in the primary. He then sucked up to Trump figuring correctly that Magadonians can't think for themselves since they are a cult, ] And he read that right. As for what Harris might have said about Biden, who cares? Biden isn't running for office. Expand Since you obviously voted for Biden the first time around I am trying to figure out your standard. I am guessing I can figure out your "standard" from the next NYT headline.
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:35 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: Since you obviously voted for Biden the first time around I am trying to figure out your standard. I am guessing I can figure out your "standard" from the next NYT headline. Expand My standard is I will vote for the individual from either of the major parties who isn't a threat to our Republic.
Pokebball Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:39 PM, Scraps said: My standard is I will vote for the individual from either of the major parties who isn't a threat to our Republic. Expand How many votes did Kamala get in the primary?
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:41 PM, Pokebball said: How many votes did Kamala get in the primary? Expand Doesn't matter. How the parties choose their nominees is up to the parties.
The Frankish Reich Posted July 28, 2024 Author Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:41 PM, Pokebball said: How many votes did Kamala get in the primary? Expand Just as many as Biden, because people voted for the Biden-Harris ticket. Your question would have been right on point if the Democrats hadn't all rallied to support Harris and instead had chosen a different candidate. But they didn't, and perhaps this was one reason why.
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:47 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Just as many as Biden, because people voted for the Biden-Harris ticket. Your question would have been right on point if the Democrats hadn't all rallied to support Harris and instead had chosen a different candidate. But they didn't, and perhaps this was one reason why. Expand For some reason, it is lost on some people that Harris is just the presumptive nominee. Anyone could challenge her. The only problem is anyone who was considered a serious contender actually endorsed her. 1
B-Man Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:47 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Just as many as Biden, because people voted for the Biden-Harris ticket. Your question would have been right on point if the Democrats hadn't all rallied to support Harris and instead had chosen a different candidate. But they didn't, and perhaps this was one reason why. Expand Funny. If you look at the primaries ballot, it just says Biden. Now you can argue that they knew Harris would remain the running mate, but did they ? There was lots of talk in the spring among democrats. Joe got the votes, Kamala rode along. The more she keeps making appearances, the more her party will regret it. . 1 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 5:51 PM, Scraps said: For some reason, it is lost on some people that Harris is just the presumptive nominee. Anyone could challenge her. The only problem is anyone who was considered a serious contender actually endorsed her. Expand You might want to talk with Tibs, when I point that out he tells me I don't understand the Dems. As for your "anyone not a threat to our Republic", you might want to to look at he people who made the rules of how to pick their candidates and then completely ignore the rules.
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 6:49 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: You might want to talk with Tibs, when I point that out he tells me I don't understand the Dems. As for your "anyone not a threat to our Republic", you might want to to look at he people who made the rules of how to pick their candidates and then completely ignore the rules. Expand How is the Democratic Party ignoring their rules?
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 7:00 PM, Scraps said: How is the Democratic Party ignoring their rules? Expand I thought you said it was an open primary, but the party is already stating she is the candidate, so is it open or she the candidate?
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 8:29 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: I thought you said it was an open primary, but the party is already stating she is the candidate, so is it open or she the candidate? Expand Is the party saying that or are they saying she is the presumptive nominee?
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 8:33 PM, Scraps said: Is the party saying that or are they saying she is the presumptive nominee? Expand https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ywewzpz2o The party is calling her the nominee, which is impressive for a women who has never received one vote at all outside of California.
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 8:46 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ywewzpz2o The party is calling her the nominee, which is impressive for a women who has never received one vote at all outside of California. Expand The BBC does not determine who wins the nomination. The delegates do that. Until the vote is taken, she is the presumptive nominee.
Doc Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 8:46 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ywewzpz2o The party is calling her the nominee, which is impressive for a women who has never received one vote at all outside of California. Expand She didn't even make it to the California primary last time. Likely because she knew she'd lose. And of course she's the nominee. You think they want an open primary and to see Grewsom win it?
Scraps Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 8:51 PM, Doc said: She didn't even make it to the California primary last time. Likely because she knew she'd lose. And of course she's the nominee. You think they want an open primary and to see Grewsom win it? Expand I think her potential serious challengers looked at the calendar, her serious advantages in the office she holds, organization and funding and decided to let her have the field this time. If she wins, great, Trump is defeated. If she loses, she is out of contention and the field is clearer in 2028.
Doc Posted July 28, 2024 Posted July 28, 2024 On 7/28/2024 at 9:55 PM, Big Blitz said: Google is evil Expand Unbelievable. I heard about this and decided to try it myself just now. It's true. 1 1 1
Recommended Posts