B-Man Posted August 14, 2024 Posted August 14, 2024 I was going to type "unbelievable" but sadly, it is not. 1 1
Doc Posted August 14, 2024 Posted August 14, 2024 On 8/14/2024 at 11:57 AM, BillsFanNC said: Expand Do they ever? On 8/14/2024 at 1:38 PM, BillsFanNC said: Expand Good one, Jon. On 8/14/2024 at 5:03 PM, BillsFanNC said: Expand Yeah, who cares about showing you can field tough questions/handle tough problems. Because world leaders will take it easy on her...
Orlando Buffalo Posted August 14, 2024 Posted August 14, 2024 On 8/14/2024 at 2:49 PM, BillsFanNC said: There's no evidence! Expand The NYT just confirmed what Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate was a factual statement? A real journalist might do background search and see if maybe that impeachment was pure political hackery.
Doc Posted August 14, 2024 Posted August 14, 2024 On 8/14/2024 at 8:21 PM, Orlando Buffalo said: The NYT just confirmed what Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate was a factual statement? A real journalist might do background search and see if maybe that impeachment was pure political hackery. Expand The more time passes... 1
The Frankish Reich Posted August 17, 2024 Author Posted August 17, 2024 Tarheel moving toward a new record, responding to himself with 6 consecutive posts. Sorry to interrupt. Please resume.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 18, 2024 Posted August 18, 2024 On 8/14/2024 at 3:41 PM, B-Man said: I was going to type "unbelievable" but sadly, it is not. Expand Inflation is right sized now, I think. Plus it wasn’t the admins fault, though she’ll address it straight up like a boss, but if she doesn’t, it’s the economy stupid. (I don’t really think you’re stupid). 1
The Frankish Reich Posted August 19, 2024 Author Posted August 19, 2024 On 8/19/2024 at 5:25 PM, BillsFanNC said: Expand Historical analogues: - Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive - Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative - Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive - Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason. 2 1
Pokebball Posted August 19, 2024 Posted August 19, 2024 On 8/19/2024 at 5:29 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Historical analogues: - Media coverage of FDR, 1942: 98% positive - Media coverage of Emperor Hirohito: 100% negative - Media coverage of LBJ, 1964: 96% positive - Media coverage of Ho Chi Minh: 99% negative Point: Sometimes Media coverage is negative for a reason. Expand Sometimes? There is always a reason. Legacy media's bias has been well proven 1
Recommended Posts