TheFunPolice Posted April 25 Posted April 25 man, if the Bears play their cards right they got a ton out of one bad season by trading top picks AND still get their pick of QBs 2 1
JROC INTEL Posted April 25 Posted April 25 What do you guys think about Legette? After watching his film i’m a bit surprised he’s not being talked about more. He looks elite. 3
section122 Posted April 25 Posted April 25 7 minutes ago, Sweats said: You know, i was the biggest supporter of just letting the board fall to us and see what's left, but i'm leaning towards swinging for the fences this year. I mean, what we've been doing hasn't been working to get us over the hump, so let's try something different. Here's what i'm thinking.......i think i would rather swing for the fences or swing for that homerun and have a miss, than not swing at all or just go after middle of the road, mediocre and take no step forward in the team's progression. Stagnant is stagnant, no matter how you cut it. We gotta elevate this team to the next level and that's why i'm kind of leaning a little more to making a splash this draft. I don't think its an either or proposition. It really comes down to the talent evaluation and player development. I am 100% in agreement that the Bills reason for failing is not enough difference makers so I am not against trading up and going all in, however I also don't hate the idea of trading back and throwing a bunch of darts at the board. I would love to get one of the top 3 but if we could get 2 of the next 7 or so guys I would also be very happy. Is it better to have 1 of Odunze, MHJ (unrealistic), Nabers, or have 2 of Worthy, Mitchell, Legette, McConkey, Coleman, Franklin, and Pearsall? I honestly don't know. I purposely left off BTJ as I think he is in his own category. Won't have to sell the farm to get him but also he has a chance to be a difference maker by himself. I also can't shake Nabers on a live stream saying BTJ is going to the Bills. I am starting to think he will be the guy in a small trade up.
Back2Buff Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 minute ago, JROC INTEL said: What do you guys think about Legette? After watching his film i’m a bit surprised he’s not being talked about more. He looks elite. Thought the same thing. He is my guy. His tape is ridiculous. 2
Nineforty Posted April 25 Posted April 25 54 minutes ago, Logic said: This is the last time I'll say this for a while, after having said it a thousand times this offseason: I'm sick of no other difference makers stepping up for the Bills in big playoff moments. I'm sick of the Bills hitting singles and doubles in the draft, but never home runs. I'm ready to swing for the fences and try to add a potential superstar to this team. I'm ready to see Rome Odunze catch a toe-tapping, game winning touchdown to beat the Chiefs and advance to the AFCCG, and I don't mind losing out on a safety and a couple backup d-linemen in order to make it happen. I know I won't win any new converts to my way of thinking, but I'm not feeling at all risk averse this year. Bring on the risk. Bring on a blue chipper. Let's do this thing. From a macro perspective, this is just the worst year to take those risks and potentially leveraging future draft capital imho. -Loaded draft. -'Reset', more holes than usual With that said, ill quickly get on board with whatever happens, go bills! 2 1
Matt_In_NH Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Draconator said: There is so much information offline you get a good read on things but you don’t have information the team has and people will continue to flip out when their guy who was mocked high all month is passed by.
Putin Posted April 25 Posted April 25 (edited) I was all about let’s go get the best WR is this draft what ever the cost , and now I’m slowly stepping back from that idea probably because I believe Bean just won’t do it . But then I look at the Dolphins and how Hill completely transformed that offense I can’t remember what they gave up for Hill but what ever it was was worth it What did Miami gave up for Hill ?? Edited April 25 by Putin 1
bigduke6 Posted April 25 Posted April 25 (edited) Josh is in his prime. swing for the fences. if you can reach one of the big 3 for decent value, do it. ive heard Beane only has 15 prospects labeled as actual 1st round grades. assuming the top 3 WRs are in there, go get one. we need a difference maker, not a wait and see. Edited April 25 by bigduke6 1
Maynard Posted April 25 Posted April 25 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Putin said: I was all about let’s go get the best WR is this draft what ever the cost , and now I’m slowly stepping back from that idea probably because I believe Bean just won’t do it . But then I look at the Dolphins and how Hill completely transformed that offense I can’t remember what they gave up for Hill but what ever it was was worth it What did Miami gave up for Hill ?? Miami gave up a first- and second-round pick, 2 4th rounders, and a 6th rounder. Edited April 25 by Maynard 1 1
Big Blitz Posted April 25 Posted April 25 11 minutes ago, Putin said: What did Miami gave up for Hill ?? Amazingly, no playoff wins and 2 Super Bowl titles to the Chiefs. 1 1
Special K Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 hour ago, Maynard said: For Odunze, I’d do it in a heartbeat. He’s a special dude. I think I'm with you........if he turns into the stud WR1 we think he will be, no one will remember how many picks were given up to get him! 2
Putin Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 minute ago, Big Blitz said: Amazingly, no playoff wins and 2 Super Bowl titles to the Chiefs. I don’t think they even make the playoffs without Hill , I’ll go even further I don’t believe they win 8 games without him , 1
BarleyNY Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 hour ago, Saint Doug said: The first sentence is saying you should not draft based on need, but you should get that in a FA. Then are you saying that you really didn’t “need” that player that has been providing their service for the last 4 years? It’s the first sentence that is the horrible take. You obviously need to draft based on need. Beane does it with his 1st/2nd round picks each year. Is he wrong? He is saying that IMMEDIATE needs should be addressed in FA so that teams can focus on drafting the best players for the long term.
Putin Posted April 25 Posted April 25 Just now, BarleyNY said: He is saying that IMMEDIATE needs should be addressed in FA so that teams can focus on drafting the best players for the long term. Hard to fill immediate needs in free agency with a food stamps card
H2o Posted April 25 Posted April 25 24 minutes ago, JROC INTEL said: What do you guys think about Legette? After watching his film i’m a bit surprised he’s not being talked about more. He looks elite. It's all in the WR thread discussions. We, on here, have talked about him quite a bit. Some people are scared by the one year of big production. Some say he is stiff in his routes. I say he looks like a faster AJ Brown clone to me. 1
Putin Posted April 25 Posted April 25 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: 28, 60, 128, 144, 2025 1st for 9 ? Who would that 9 get us ?
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 25 Posted April 25 Just now, Putin said: Who would that 9 get us ? Odunze would be the reason we move to 9 1
Starr-Bills Posted April 25 Posted April 25 17 minutes ago, Maynard said: Miami gave up a first- and second-round pick, 2 4th rounders, and a 6th rounder. This sounds like a good price for Chicago at 9, they have few picks. (And yes I’m going to throw Knox in there again as a sweetener, just don’t see his value vs a cheap FA and kincade)
Recommended Posts