97bills Posted April 24 Posted April 24 37 minutes ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said: Hopefully not too aggressive. Hard to shake the ghosts of Sammy Watkins from the memory banks, but it feels like that same situation. The draft is loaded with WR potential, and Whaley wanted to get the cream of that crop… then Davante Adams goes in the second round. Point is, in a deep class I’d rather fire 2, even 3 bullets trying to find the Davante Adams, Aj Brown, DK Metcalf, or even Justin Jefferson in the late 1st, rather than risk the farm and hope Nabers or whoever is more Jamar Chase than Sammy “Can’t Miss, Generational Talent” Watkins. I was thinking the same thing today, when we traded up for Watkins in a loaded draft, everyone said how stupid that was.
gonzo1105 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said: I refuse to believe my future #1 WR is a burner that's 5' 11" 165 lbs. Give me BTJ. I think the Bills intend to spread the ball around moreso than having a dominate # 1 guy per say, even if they go up and get an Odunze imo. I dont think you look at it as Worthy is the # 1 WR. 2 1
Dr. Who Posted April 24 Posted April 24 1 minute ago, 97bills said: I was thinking the same thing today, when we traded up for Watkins in a loaded draft, everyone said how stupid that was. The other thing that is stupid is to overgeneralize from a single example. 1 3
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Just now, 97bills said: I was thinking the same thing today, when we traded up for Watkins in a loaded draft, everyone said how stupid that was. Again…. It was stupid because the Bills were no where near being a legit contending team. This team has a yearly MVP nominee at QB 3 1
muppy Posted April 24 Posted April 24 (edited) Only 2 more sleeps until the draft!!!!! The wait is almost over. PLEASE Brandon Beane choose wisely. I Know he will move up for his guy. if he wants him badly enough I don't doubt it for a second. I'm nervous about this scenario though I'm not gonna lie Edited April 24 by muppy 5 2
Beck Water Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Friendly reminder that we all wanted Beane to do his "due diligence" on trading in both directions.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 24 Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Dr. Who said: Let's just pretend they get to 4. Who do you think they are taking in that scenario? MHJ I’ve heard that they love Nabers from a reliable source. I just can’t wrap my head around passing on MHJ. His ceiling is the best WR in football and a HOF career. His floor is pro bowl WR IMO. If you’re spending that kind of draft capital you want both the high ceiling and high floor. 1 5
Dr. Who Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Just now, Kirby Jackson said: MHJ I’ve heard that they love Nabers from a reliable source. I just can’t wrap my head around passing on MHJ. His ceiling is the best WR in football and a HOF career. His floor is pro bowl WR IMO. If you’re spending that kind of draft capital you want both the high ceiling and high floor. Yeah, I agree. I have days where I really like the other guys, but I just couldn't pass on MHJ.
Richard Noggin Posted April 24 Posted April 24 38 minutes ago, JBI$111 said: Hopefully the Bill's don't give up too much, they usually get fleeced and give away more than the trade value would suggest when they make moves up or generally make a trade. Other teams know they're desperate to trade up for a wide receiver, it's a huge glaring need and of course they'll take advantage of it. The Bill's are not in a good position to negotiate fair value if they want to trade up that bad and other teams know it. Maybe trade up a little bit and get Worthy and then trade for Metcalf or get another large receiver later on after they get Worthy. Can't let Miami get Worthy or Kansas City. Agree with much of what you share here EXCEPT I think the Bills definitely CAN "let Miami get Worthy." That would be some silly asset allocation for a team stacked with WR speed but lacking on both lines. No need to be determined to prevent that scenario. But to think the Bills would somehow let Worthy get past them and land in the laps of KC...THAT would hurt. Can't imagine KC giving up much capital to move up FAR for a WR with some other notable needs that line up with their current draft position (OL, DB, etc.), which would mean we let Worthy fall back to them and likely spent capital on moving up for a different WR (in a potentially historic WR draft). 27 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: I would think we’d only be trading up for a wr. Nabers is my unrealistic dream, but we prob would have to trade up too far for him. Odunze is prob the big trade up possibility and don’t be surprised if the smaller trade up would not be for Thomas jr, but would be for worthy. IF they trade up, it better be for a WR. And I really hope that would only be a smaller, Beaney trade up from 28 to 18 or even better, somewhere in the early 20s. Trading WAY up in a draft so loaded with potential prospects seems foolhardy. 1
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: MHJ I’ve heard that they love Nabers from a reliable source. I just can’t wrap my head around passing on MHJ. His ceiling is the best WR in football and a HOF career. His floor is pro bowl WR IMO. If you’re spending that kind of draft capital you want both the high ceiling and high floor. I believe Josh Allen may like Nabers most. He mentioned him first when discussing WR’s. Joe B also had us trading up to 7 for Nabers in his last mock 1
Kirby Jackson Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Can we make an agreement that we won’t compare whatever happens Thursday to trading up for a WR a decade ago? In case people haven’t realized, the world is much different now. The Bills are Super Bowl contenders with a top 2 QB and missing WR1 & WR2. Additionally, a top end WR used to account for like 7% of the cap. Now it is almost double that. When you have an elite QB, you are really in a tough spot if you have to pay WR too. 10 3 3 5
london_bills Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Wonder if the giants would accept next year's 1 and 2 and Elam to get up to 6 1
Kaenon Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Smokescreen. Or at the least, making the steps to satiate the fans appetite and go "well we tried, but the right deal wasn't there to do it that made sense for us." And Beane will go on to say, "But we drafted Devontez Walker and we think this kid is going to be a star." 1
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, london_bills said: Wonder if the giants would accept next year's 1 and 2 and Elam to get up to 6 28, 128, 160, 2025 1st, 2nd and they probably ask for another pick 1
Starr Almighty Posted April 24 Posted April 24 1 hour ago, bills6969 said: Beane trades up but drafts a DB I was 100% sure we were drafting Mack when they chose Watkins 1
MikePJ76 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 The best part about thursday is that we will find out how the actual nfl teams view the players. Content creators have 4 months of screaming into the great big void about who wants what and where....then the actual draft comes and usually we find out very few of these people have a really accurate beat on how players are viewed. Teams have more info than the content creators and it always shows on the weekend of the draft. the best part is the freak out from these people about how team x could have taken player Y 2 rounds earlier over player Z....while never acknowledging that what they didn't know about player Z is he had both thumbs removed in the offseason and now has to catch the ball like a golden retriever. I look forward to that every year. Tomorrow around the league we should start to get a more accurate view of things. I heard bryan broaddus on the radio here in DFW today talking about how one of his GM friends said Latham, the O-lineman is viewed higher than most of the analysts are projecting and will be gone in the teens. FWIW he keeps talking about the chiefs and cowboys making a deal if Dallas's players are gone when they pick at 24 and he knows KC has the ammunition to move up and have some players targeted, he mentioned wr. anyway. I am completely against selling out this whole draft and the best part of next years for a wr. 5 1 1
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 24 Posted April 24 19 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: MHJ I’ve heard that they love Nabers from a reliable source. I just can’t wrap my head around passing on MHJ. His ceiling is the best WR in football and a HOF career. His floor is pro bowl WR IMO. If you’re spending that kind of draft capital you want both the high ceiling and high floor. Nabers is the definition of explosiveness 2
Thrivefourfive Posted April 24 Posted April 24 MHJ is silky smooth. He can flow anywhere on the field, catches everything that hits his hands. I have this weird feeling that he’s going to get knocked around and leg injuries will slow him down. He’s long. Big target, for defenses. Those hybrid LBs like Bernard steamrolling the kid when he’s stretched out. Also, the expectation cannot be any higher. I read it here.. he’s a Hall of Famer and/or a perennial All-Pro (HoF’er). I know I’m just digging here, but IF the fairy tale doesn’t happen, what would be the reasons..? Not talent, not pedigree, not mental, not diva. I’m staking Nabers, in a way that he just won’t g.a.s. He’ll play so hard and so fast that he’s going to scare defenses. To me, he looks like he has an extra hot fire burning and wants to be the best. He just looks mean out there.
Mikie2times Posted April 24 Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Nabers is the definition of explosiveness He's nuts. His legs almost look like they're going so fast he loses control of his body at times. MHJ is elite, but Nabers is also a potential first year pro bowler. The separation tells you all you need to know. On his deep routes he's alone and it's not just speed. His route running tricks the DB in most cases and he's gone the second that happens. 1 1
Recommended Posts