Einstein's Dog Posted April 22 Posted April 22 8 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: Oh I see what you mean now. Agree. No WR even the top 3 guys would match what Diggs produced. My thought is you get a guy or two and hope the offense is more diverse with Kincaid, Cook, Knox, and Samuel getting lots of opportunities. Are you advocating trading draft pick for a veteran? FYI I don't believe anything Beane says. The only truthful statement he made was the Bills are worse without Diggs. There is no way he believes the WR group is ok. Honestly if he drafted 3 WR it would be less shocking than if he takes an edge in round 1. Yes, I am all for trading a lower draft pick for one of the vets. I think Beane would stay away from the divas that require both draft capital and money, so J Jeff/Aiyuk/Higgins would be out. But other options remain: For instance I use the Tenn + DHop as an example, if they take Rome at #7 then DHop would be prime candidate to deal for a 4th. Similarly C Godwin at Tampa could possibly be moved since they just poured big bucks into M Evans. D Metcalf might be a possibility with new management wanting to craft a team. I think after Beane does one of those type of moves to replace Diggs the draft becomes more in line with what we expected before. Maybe trade down and get that 3rd back. DL and WR would top the list but we can't count out the love for a S or CB. Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 22 Posted April 22 16 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: Agree. Much rather draft edge in round 2. My distaste for AJE is well documented. I think the corpse of Von will rise and have 9 sacks this year. AJE will have 3 in the first 6 weeks and then disappear again. AJE will out sack Von this year. I am absolutely certain of that. 14 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Im actually not that keen on Chop at 28 to be honest … If Von is really washed as you say .. then Edge is by far the biggest need on the team, way bigger than WR … .. to say they are even threadbare would be an overstatement… they haven’t replaced Floyd yet That they have done nothing aside from paying Toohill the vet minimum makes me think they have been eyeballing Miller over the offseason and are ok with him… on the other hand … if they take Kneeland at 28…then that’s out the window What have they seen of Von yet? Basically nothing. A few days of stretching. They are gambling on Von being back. I understand why. They don't have free agency dollars and beyond the top 3 (or 4 depending how you feel about Chop) its a weak draft at that spot. Von rebounding is their best hope. But its a wing and a prayer IMO. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 22 Posted April 22 8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: AJE will out sack Von this year. I am absolutely certain of that. What have they seen of Von yet? Basically nothing. A few days of stretching. They are gambling on Von being back. I understand why. They don't have free agency dollars and beyond the top 3 (or 4 depending how you feel about Chop) it’s a weak draft at that spot. Von rebounding is their best hope. But it’s a wing and a prayer IMO. He was stiff as a board last year and moved like a statue… You can’t “gamble” of more of the same of that… not when Floyd has gone as well… Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: He was stiff as a board last year and moved like a statue… You can’t “gamble” of more of the same of that… not when Floyd has gone as well… Well that is what they are doing. They can't be basing it off anything else other than educated guesses by the medics. At most they have seen 1 week of stretching where no football moves are allowed. They can't be basing decisions on that. Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Just now, GunnerBill said: Well that is what they are doing. They can't be basing it off anything else other than educated guesses by the medics. At most they have seen 1 week of stretching where no football moves are allowed. They can't be basing decisions on that. We’ll see then won’t we ? Because if he is the same player he was last year … and they do nothing else about it other than Toohill and another scrub in FA .. they are rooted Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: We’ll see then won’t we ? Because if he is the same player he was last year … and they do nothing else about it other than Toohill and another scrub in FA .. they are rooted I think Groot will start left end and Von and AJE will end us time sharing RE. That is less than ideal. I agree. But there is no obvious route to improve unless they strike lucky on a dust settles guy in June or July willing to take a 1 year prove it deal. Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: I think Groot will start left end and Von and AJE will end us time sharing RE. That is less than ideal. I agree. But there is no obvious route to improve unless they strike lucky on a dust settles guy in June or July willing to take a 1 year prove it deal. Less than ideal is an understatement … Beane is not going to “hope for best “ … he just doesn’t do that Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: Less than ideal is an understatement … Beane is not going to “hope for best “ … he just doesn’t do that So what do you think he will do? Beyond your "he has seen Von in practice and is happy" which as I say cannot be true because they are one week into phase 1 of the offseason, what is your theory? Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: So what do you think he will do? Beyond your "he has seen Von in practice and is happy" which as I say cannot be true because they are one week into phase 1 of the offseason, what is your theory? Not last week .: They would have needed to make the decision 6 weeks ago when they could have done something in FA about it … Im assuming that they are ok with him…and must think he is a better player than what he showed last year.. What’s your theory … ? that he is “ Washed” but they are still going to persevere with him ? Washed to me means that the guy is finished and not at an NFL level anymore … kind of like what he showed last year … Why would they continue to persevere with him if that’s the case ? Quote
The Jokeman Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 hour ago, Einstein's Dog said: Yes, I am all for trading a lower draft pick for one of the vets. I think Beane would stay away from the divas that require both draft capital and money, so J Jeff/Aiyuk/Higgins would be out. But other options remain: For instance I use the Tenn + DHop as an example, if they take Rome at #7 then DHop would be prime candidate to deal for a 4th. Similarly C Godwin at Tampa could possibly be moved since they just poured big bucks into M Evans. D Metcalf might be a possibility with new management wanting to craft a team. I think after Beane does one of those type of moves to replace Diggs the draft becomes more in line with what we expected before. Maybe trade down and get that 3rd back. DL and WR would top the list but we can't count out the love for a S or CB. If anything new management would move an aging Tyler Lockett over Metcalf. Quote
Einstein's Dog Posted April 23 Posted April 23 36 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: If anything new management would move an aging Tyler Lockett over Metcalf. T Lockett, to me, is not the same level as what I expected from Diggs in 2024. And Lockett was just signed to a deal with a signing bonus, so if the Bills wanted him they would probably need to give a little boost in draft capital to offset the low salary. I hope the Bills go in a different direction than him. Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 23 Posted April 23 4 hours ago, GunnerBill said: It is a long developed history going back to Carolina though that they like long arms. Again Beane's drafting preferences are very Carolina. 34 inch plus arms are definitely a preferred trait for their edge guys. Not saying they just pick guys on arm length but it IS a singificant factor in the edge guys they like IMO. I really hope they don't draft Kneeland. I didn't like the Basham pick and I'd like this even less. But I do think they likely think he is an option at #60. I don’t disagree he is in play at 60, he’s a round 2 or 3 guy this year. But there is absolutely no way Beane takes him at 28. I guess nothing is impossible, but I’d be stunned and may break my TV if that happened. He is a 4th round prospect IMHO who’s gonna go earlier because there are not a lot of options at EDGE this year. Quote
Chaos Posted April 23 Posted April 23 3 hours ago, GunnerBill said: So what do you think he will do? Beyond your "he has seen Von in practice and is happy" which as I say cannot be true because they are one week into phase 1 of the offseason, what is your theory? My theory is that the Bills are looking towards 2025. And the 2024 strategy is to go as far as Josh Allen can carry them. Relatively inexpericenced OC's and DC's are set up to be the fall guys for 2024, if Allen can't carry them to the playoffs. I don't think Beane is worried one way or the other about 2024 pass rush. Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 23 Posted April 23 (edited) 1 hour ago, Chaos said: My theory is that the Bills are looking towards 2025. And the 2024 strategy is to go as far as Josh Allen can carry them. Relatively inexpericenced OC's and DC's are set up to be the fall guys for 2024, if Allen can't carry them to the playoffs. I don't think Beane is worried one way or the other about 2024 pass rush. Not sure I buy that … he has got 8 Day 3 picks … but he still gets replacements for WR5 and LB4 in free agency … he seems more than thorough But if that is indeed the case .,, He needs to be a little careful about how treating Josh like a pack horse carrying all the load ..Josh might not want to hang around forever either spinning his wheels during his prime years …… Edited April 23 by Aussie Joe Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 23 Posted April 23 7 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: Not last week .: They would have needed to make the decision 6 weeks ago when they could have done something in FA about it … Im assuming that they are ok with him…and must think he is a better player than what he showed last year.. What’s your theory … ? that he is “ Washed” but they are still going to persevere with him ? Washed to me means that the guy is finished and not at an NFL level anymore … kind of like what he showed last year … Why would they continue to persevere with him if that’s the case ? They are not allowed by league rule to observe their players working out 6 weeks ago. I think they and their doctors have spoken to Von and believe there is a chance he can get back. But it isn't based on any full physical assessment they have carried out. Because between locker clean out day and the start of phase 1 they are not allowed to do that. My theory is he is washed. I don't think Beane agrees but I think that is based on a hope and an optimism rather than anything more substantial than that. Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 23 Posted April 23 4 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: I don’t disagree he is in play at 60, he’s a round 2 or 3 guy this year. But there is absolutely no way Beane takes him at 28. I guess nothing is impossible, but I’d be stunned and may break my TV if that happened. He is a 4th round prospect IMHO who’s gonna go earlier because there are not a lot of options at EDGE this year. I think he is a 5th round prospect. I would break my tv if the Bills draft him anywhere. But as much as I don't want it to happen I fear it is very much in play. He is their type, they have had him in the building.... but it would be a wasted pick. 4 hours ago, Chaos said: My theory is that the Bills are looking towards 2025. And the 2024 strategy is to go as far as Josh Allen can carry them. Relatively inexpericenced OC's and DC's are set up to be the fall guys for 2024, if Allen can't carry them to the playoffs. I don't think Beane is worried one way or the other about 2024 pass rush. I think he is "worried" but I think he knows he doesn't have many options for addressing it. They are going to have to reach on a guy in this class, hit gold in late FA (a bit like last year I suppose) or ride with what they have. Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 23 Posted April 23 (edited) 52 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I think he is a 5th round prospect. I would break my tv if the Bills draft him anywhere. But as much as I don't want it to happen I fear it is very much in play. He is their type, they have had him in the building.... but it would be a wasted pick. Yours is the second TV going … If you don’t have Kneeland going in the Top 2 rounds in your final mock … you have given up 58 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: They are not allowed by league rule to observe their players working out 6 weeks ago. I think they and their doctors have spoken to Von and believe there is a chance he can get back. But it isn't based on any full physical assessment they have carried out. Because between locker clean out day and the start of phase 1 they are not allowed to do that. My theory is he is washed. I don't think Beane agrees but I think that is based on a hope and an optimism rather than anything more substantial than that. Their actions in the draft will tell me what I need to know… If Beane had concerns … he probably makes a move like retaining Floyd … the fact the 49ers still value Floyd speaks volumes to me … if Beane has concerns about Miller, than forgo Samuel and keep Floyd … Edited April 23 by Aussie Joe Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 23 Posted April 23 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said: I think he is a 5th round prospect. I would break my tv if the Bills draft him anywhere. But as much as I don't want it to happen I fear it is very much in play. He is their type, they have had him in the building.... but it would be a wasted pick. Im with you. Like I said in another post, I think he’s a round 4 guy who’s gonna go round 2 or 3 because the class is weak, so I am with you on that. I would break my TV if he was taken at 28! But at 60 I could live with it even though there will be people there I would take over him I’m sure. Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 23 Posted April 23 48 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Yours is the second TV going … If you don’t have Kneeland going in the Top 2 rounds in your final mock … you have given up My final mock is only a 1 rounder. If I did into round 2 Kneeland would be a fringe 2nd round guy..... he could go late two or he will go early 3. Mocking and grading are different. As @Alphadawg7 says he is going to get pushed up by a weak edge class - especially for guys to play as a 4-3 end. 1 1 Quote
No_Matter_What Posted April 23 Posted April 23 You guys know that your TV's have nothing to do with the Bills picks, right? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.