SoonerBillsFan Posted April 15 Posted April 15 5 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: It won’t be enough Well then we are screwed. I can't see beane dumping a huge contract just to add another one this year. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 15 Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: Well then we are screwed. I can't see beane dumping a huge contract just to add another one this year. They dumped Diggs because he was a cancer … what he got paid is irrelevant 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted April 16 Posted April 16 9 hours ago, dave mcbride said: and with the quarterback being up in a year Man I'm shocked by how many people see the 49ers extending Purdy as a foregone conclusion. I thought he was by far their biggest weakness in the Super Bowl. He couldn't win one with an elite LT and like 4 elite weapons. What else can they possibly give him to get them over the hump? It would be a monumental mistake to give him a big extension IMO. 3 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 6 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Man I'm shocked by how many people see the 49ers extending Purdy as a foregone conclusion. I thought he was by far their biggest weakness in the Super Bowl. He couldn't win one with an elite LT and like 4 elite weapons. What else can they possibly give him to get them over the hump? It would be a monumental mistake to give him a big extension IMO. Well.. when they tried to pick one giving up multiple firsts it was one of the biggest disasters we have seen in 20 years .. Maybe they should be sticking with what they have based on that effort Edited April 16 by Aussie Joe 1 Quote
WickedGame Posted April 16 Posted April 16 9 hours ago, KDIGGZ said: I don't think the Bills dumped a big contract to sign up for another. Probably looking to get cheaper at the position. I hate when people say this. It’s reductive. There’s a massive difference between paying big money to a 30-year-old Stefon Diggs who underperformed and paying big money to a 26-year-old Aiyuk who has improved every year and is easily in his prime. I’m not saying the $25m-$30m/year would be easy to swallow, but let’s not pretend Diggs’ salary and value is an apples-to-apples comparison with Aiyuk at a similar salary. Nobody wants a car payment after you’ve just finished paying off your car, but I’d rather have a new Maserati than a used Mercedes. 1 Quote
stuvian Posted April 16 Posted April 16 I think DK Metcalf is an all out world beater but I just don't see us doing something splashy. It's not like we're one player away. We need a center, some back 7 defenders and another pass rusher. Expecting Josh to win every game for us is fool's gold. 59 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Man I'm shocked by how many people see the 49ers extending Purdy as a foregone conclusion. I thought he was by far their biggest weakness in the Super Bowl. He couldn't win one with an elite LT and like 4 elite weapons. What else can they possibly give him to get them over the hump? It would be a monumental mistake to give him a big extension IMO. what do you see SF doing at QB instead? Quote
HappyDays Posted April 16 Posted April 16 11 minutes ago, stuvian said: what do you see SF doing at QB instead? That isn't the question. The question is, has San Fran hit their ceiling with Purdy? Given how ridiculously talented that supporting cast was they should have had an all time dominant playoff offense. Instead they fell short in critical moments and probably shouldn't have even made it past Detroit to be honest. So now you're going to give Purdy all of his supporting cast's money and hope you somehow exceed last year's performance? I don't know what the answer is but he definitely isn't it IMO. Quote
That's No Moon Posted April 16 Posted April 16 17 minutes ago, stuvian said: I think DK Metcalf is an all out world beater but I just don't see us doing something splashy. It's not like we're one player away. We need a center, some back 7 defenders and another pass rusher. Expecting Josh to win every game for us is fool's gold. Yeahhhhh, but Josh with a guy who can and will just go get the football has to be intriguing. Quote
GASabresIUFan Posted April 16 Posted April 16 Bold prediction; WR is the next position to see contract deflation. As we Bills fans now see, WRs have a limited shelf life. To much talent at that position coming out of college and to many good guys floating around free agency. Teams can likely afford one star pass catcher either at TE or WR, but the rest will likely rotate over time. Quote
dave mcbride Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 9 minutes ago, HappyDays said: That isn't the question. The question is, has San Fran hit their ceiling with Purdy? Given how ridiculously talented that supporting cast was they should have had an all time dominant playoff offense. Instead they fell short in critical moments and probably shouldn't have even made it past Detroit to be honest. So now you're going to give Purdy all of his supporting cast's money and hope you somehow exceed last year's performance? I don't know what the answer is but he definitely isn't it IMO. But he played lights out in the second half vs Detroit and won the game for them. Honestly, if SF stops a fourth and 2-3 on their own side of the field in OT, he’s the SB hero. He’s better than you give him credit for. Quote
HappyDays Posted April 16 Posted April 16 12 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: But he played lights out in the second half vs Detroit and won the game for them. Honestly, if SF stops a fourth and 2-3 on their own side of the field in OT, he’s the SB hero. He’s better than you give him credit for. He threw a duck that bounced off a DB's facemask and miraculously bounced into Aiyuk's hands for a 50 yard completion. If that play gets intercepted as it should have been, the game would have been over right there. Purdy's biggest strength is that he seemingly shares one brain with Kyle Shanahan. It's why a QB with his limitations can be as successful as he has been in that situation. But the physical limitations are just too much to overcome IMO. Constantly in the Super Bowl I saw a QB that was always off the mark whenever he had to deal with a bit of pressure. Guys were wide open all over the place and he just couldn't drive the ball to them. It's just too difficult to win a Super Bowl with that kind of fatal flaw. Eventually you're going to have to deal with a pass rush and win from a messy pocket. There's two questions here - Can he win a Super Bowl? Sure, under perfect circumstances it's possible as he proved last year. Can he win a Super Bowl while taking up a sizeable percentage of the salary cap? To that I say no. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted April 16 Posted April 16 4 minutes ago, HappyDays said: He threw a duck that bounced off a DB's facemask and miraculously bounced into Aiyuk's hands for a 50 yard completion. If that play gets intercepted as it should have been, the game would have been over right there. Purdy's biggest strength is that he seemingly shares one brain with Kyle Shanahan. It's why a QB with his limitations can be as successful as he has been in that situation. But the physical limitations are just too much to overcome IMO. Constantly in the Super Bowl I saw a QB that was always off the mark whenever he had to deal with a bit of pressure. Guys were wide open all over the place and he just couldn't drive the ball to them. It's just too difficult to win a Super Bowl with that kind of fatal flaw. Eventually you're going to have to deal with a pass rush and win from a messy pocket. There's two questions here - Can he win a Super Bowl? Sure, under perfect circumstances it's possible as he proved last year. Can he win a Super Bowl while taking up a sizeable percentage of the salary cap? To that I say no. Brock Purdy should thank his lucky stars Tua exists running a derivative scheme from his HC’s tree. He seems like a good kid so I don’t like to rag on him, but he’s closer to Mac Jones than an elite QB. Quote
Nihilarian Posted April 16 Posted April 16 7 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: They dumped Diggs because he was a cancer … what he got paid is irrelevant Not only that, they ate 30 mill in cap space to dump him and another 3 mill to boot. When we look back I think it had to be done no matter how well he does during the regular season for the Texans. Quote
pennstate10 Posted April 16 Posted April 16 9 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: To be going into this season paying their most expensive receiver $8m is crazy … if this is the plan… they better hit on two big names in the draft … Picking a guy at 28 and the fourth round isn’t good enough in my view Hmmm… Did the chiefs pay any WR >$8 million last year? 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 16 Posted April 16 1 hour ago, pennstate10 said: Hmmm… Did the chiefs pay any WR >$8 million last year? We aren’t the Chiefs … we are tying to beat them… unsuccessfully so far in the Playoffs 1 Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted April 16 Posted April 16 18 hours ago, Logic said: I tend to think that with as expensive as WR contracts are getting, and as many good ones as are coming out in the draft each year, and as quickly as many of them seem to be able to hit the ground running... WR may become the next position where it's smart to "turn and burn". Draft a guy, pay him on a rookie wage scale for four years (or five if he's a first rounder), then trade him or let him walk and get a compensatory pick. Wash, rinse, repeat. Only the elite guys will merit those mega-extensions. If the supply of good, draftable WRs continues to go up, and the cost to re-sign them continues to climb, the wave will crest, and they'll eventually start going the way of RBs. Maybe. Just maybe. Supply and demand. don’t think it will go the way or rbs any time soon but I think like rbs are maybe undervalued right now wrs are overvalued. And that is part of what the gms are saying. Quote
djp14150 Posted April 16 Posted April 16 19 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said: Interesting article especially about teams not wanting to give WR’s long term deals. That would suggest Metcalf would be more desirable than Aiyuk and it might be cheaper draft capital wise to get them than people think. WRs turning into RBs with many replaceable unless there is something very special about them…then you keep them. from financial cap structure you can’t pay high on two WRs unlesss you are riding rookie contracts elsewhere. Top WR wants thr high money, but are thry worth it. Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 16 Posted April 16 20 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Eagles just gave DeVonta Smith 3 for 75 mil & if the Bills got DK Metcalf, I'd do laps around my house. One of my favorite players. Believe he'd be a complete monster with Allen It would definitely move a little bit if this happened Quote
Green Lightning Posted April 16 Posted April 16 19 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: Yeah AJ Brown has separated from Metcalf but DK is still really good. If they could get him for a second round pick...........that would be a great get, IMO. If the draft were to go the way the mock community expects then the part of the WR group that drops way off by 60 is definitely the boundary WR. DK is a legit boundary option and he's been a better player in the playoffs than the regular season. Likely because of his physicality. Good fit for late season games in Highmark stadium, IMO. I doubt they do anything until after the draft. Likely most teams are in that mode. If DK is available afterwards, that may be a great get depending on who we draft. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.