ChiGoose Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 Tommy Eyerolls continues to be confused by the concept of linear time and the idea of news. "Wow, people really seem to be talking about the closing arguments of the first ever trial of the former US president that is happening today. That seems odd to me, a real human with a working and thinking brain." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 51 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Tommy Eyerolls continues to be confused by the concept of linear time and the idea of news. "Wow, people really seem to be talking about the closing arguments of the first ever trial of the former US president that is happening today. That seems odd to me, a real human with a working and thinking brain." Tommy Eyerolls is gonna stick. But don’t distract them with things like “news,” as in “something that is happening or has recently happened.” He and his ilk are too busy trying to get in their Uncle Rico time machines to change history by firing the Frankfurt School professors c. 1939. Not Hitler. No. Adorno and Horkheimer. 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: You go to Politico for your reliable news And he goes to Twitter. And then immediately stops. Which is how he knew about that Stallone-Denzel alt Union before everybody else did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: LOL. The judge hasn’t even instructed the jury yet. Not surprised that Sean Davis has no idea what’s going on though, to be honest. LOL. Absolutely NO ONE on the board is surprised that ChiGoose has no idea of the (well publicized) instructions the judge gave to the jury at the beginning of the trial. To be honest. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 28 Author Share Posted May 28 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 Don't tell the King. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Tommy Eyerolls is gonna stick. But don’t distract them with things like “news,” as in “something that is happening or has recently happened.” He and his ilk are too busy trying to get in their Uncle Rico time machines to change history by firing the Frankfurt School professors c. 1939. Not Hitler. No. Adorno and Horkheimer. And he goes to Twitter. And then immediately stops. Which is how he knew about that Stallone-Denzel alt Union before everybody else did. Nice strawman fallacy ad hominem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 Shocked I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 Funny, these idiots didn’t mind LAWFARE when Cohen went to jail lying on Trump’s behalf. They also didn’t mind when Barr re-imprisoned Cohen when Cohen announced he was going to release a tell all book before the 2020 election. Election interference, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 Found the crime. Trump had a flux capacitor. Stole plutonium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 🎯 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 Hey Judge , nice instructions. There are other ways a New York street could be wet besides rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 Guilt by "theories" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 Life imitates the Bee again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 MY LEGAL ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ATTORNEYS: NEXT STEP U.S. SUPREME COURT In Bush v. Gore, the United States Supreme Court interceded in the Florida Supreme Court's deliberations because that Court was changing the Florida voting system on the fly, thereby violating the EQUAL PROTECTION rights of the Florida voters; that is, the state court was establishing new standards for resolving a presidential election. The Manhattan trial court has done worse. It has taken up a case in which there is exclusive FEDERAL JURISDICTION (involving the Federal Election Campaign Act) despite the fact that the federal agencies with authority over enforcing federal campaign laws, the Federal Election Commission and the Southern District of New York/U.S. attorney's office, declined to bring charges; where the judge is conflicted (his daughter is raising tens of millions of dollars on behalf of her Democrat Party clients); where collateral evidence has been abundant (and has no probative value); where the elements of the supposed federal offense were never articulated by the state or the Court; the imposition of a gag order on the defendant who is the future Republican nominee for president in the midst of the federal campaign for president; and so forth. Moreover, this state court could have easily avoided influencing and interfering with the federal presidential election merely by setting a later time for the case, if the court actually believed it somehow had merit. After all, the state waited years to bring its case. Therefore, there is not only a federal constitutional equal protection violation, in that this state trial court has purposefully interposed itself into the federal presidential election without authority or jurisdiction but has also violated the federal constitutionally protected due process rights of the future Republican nominee for president. Furthermore, the voters are to determine the federal election outcome without the interference of a state court attempting to influence the result. If President Trump is found guilty of any of the thirty-four charges, I would strongly encourage his attorneys to seek an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court based, at least in significant part, on Bush v. Gore. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 103 (2000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: MY LEGAL ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ATTORNEYS: NEXT STEP U.S. SUPREME COURT In Bush v. Gore, the United States Supreme Court interceded in the Florida Supreme Court's deliberations because that Court was changing the Florida voting system on the fly, thereby violating the EQUAL PROTECTION rights of the Florida voters; that is, the state court was establishing new standards for resolving a presidential election. The Manhattan trial court has done worse. It has taken up a case in which there is exclusive FEDERAL JURISDICTION (involving the Federal Election Campaign Act) despite the fact that the federal agencies with authority over enforcing federal campaign laws, the Federal Election Commission and the Southern District of New York/U.S. attorney's office, declined to bring charges; where the judge is conflicted (his daughter is raising tens of millions of dollars on behalf of her Democrat Party clients); where collateral evidence has been abundant (and has no probative value); where the elements of the supposed federal offense were never articulated by the state or the Court; the imposition of a gag order on the defendant who is the future Republican nominee for president in the midst of the federal campaign for president; and so forth. Moreover, this state court could have easily avoided influencing and interfering with the federal presidential election merely by setting a later time for the case, if the court actually believed it somehow had merit. After all, the state waited years to bring its case. Therefore, there is not only a federal constitutional equal protection violation, in that this state trial court has purposefully interposed itself into the federal presidential election without authority or jurisdiction but has also violated the federal constitutionally protected due process rights of the future Republican nominee for president. Furthermore, the voters are to determine the federal election outcome without the interference of a state court attempting to influence the result. If President Trump is found guilty of any of the thirty-four charges, I would strongly encourage his attorneys to seek an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court based, at least in significant part, on Bush v. Gore. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 103 (2000 tl;dr Expects Trump to be convicted. Urges Trump to seek extraordinary means to bypass the regular NY State appeals process to go directly to the Supreme Court, where 3 justices were appointed by him and 2 other justices will ratify whatever he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 29 Author Share Posted May 29 ⬆️ Finding Saul the commie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 ⬆️ Cuts and pastes from parody accounts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 The thing the limousine liberals don't grasp. Is most people outside their little class, but the same party, have a distrust of the police and judicial system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts