Jump to content

TSW 2.0 Poll - Who should the Bills draft at 41?  

93 members have voted

  1. 1. TSW 2.0 Poll - Who should the Bills draft at 41?

    • Jonathon Brooks, RB, Texas
      0
    • Trey Benson, RB, Florida St
      2
    • Blake Corum, RB, Michigan
      0
    • Keon Coleman, WR, Florida St
      9
    • Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon
      69
    • Ennis Rakestraw Jr, DB, Missouri
      1
    • Tyler Nubin, S, Minnesota
      3
    • T'Vondre Sweat, DT, Missouri
      5
    • Chris Braswell, Edge, Alabama
      2

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/13/2024 at 06:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, DJB said:


And worst yet Coleman is likely best suited for the slot position at the next level 

 

Yeah,  which means that the Bills would be drafting him to fill a similar role as Kincaid.  

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

It’s Franklin.  Run to the podium Virgil!  
 

Lock it up.  


I’m going to give it another hour or so, but it does appear to be that way 

Posted

I went Franklin because if there is a chance to double-dip at WR, there's not another player left with his skillset. Also, I think Coleman falls further than Franklin would, so there's still a slight chance to trade up for Coleman. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Virgil said:

Poll will close at 2p.  Still one of our fastest polls 


Have any of the boards picks ever been picked by the Bills?

Posted

Voted Franklin and it’s not even close. But I will add what some others have said, we should attempt to trade up to about 50 if Sweat is still there. Since this poll is ending and the draft will continue, maybe while people are still making their picks, put a new poll out there asking this very thing. I don’t know what the trade chart value is to move from 58 to 50. But whatever that value is, should be polled if we should do it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrags said:

Voted Franklin and it’s not even close. But I will add what some others have said, we should attempt to trade up to about 50 if Sweat is still there. Since this poll is ending and the draft will continue, maybe while people are still making their picks, put a new poll out there asking this very thing. I don’t know what the trade chart value is to move from 58 to 50. But whatever that value is, should be polled if we should do it. 


It’s roughly 80 points on the chart. A 4 and a 5. 

Posted
Just now, MrEpsYtown said:


It’s roughly 80 points on the chart. A 4 and a 5. 

I’d offer a little less and see if it can get done. But I’d do it regardless. We did get those 2 extra picks out of our trade back from 28, so that helps a little. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Dang, I sure hope if we trade down in real life that we can still get Xavier Legette. If we will miss out on him I'd rather just stay and pick him at 28.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I took Legette for the Commanders because I think the guy is gonna be a beast. I also think the style of offense Kingsbury wants to run warrants the selection. Lastly, I took Legette to let those who were hoping to say "I told you so" about the trade back bask in their utter disappointment. So they would cuss at the monitor or the screen in their hands because the team in front of the Bills took who many of them were hoping to get. 

 

Now people have to reason within themselves and come up with an explanation as to why they believe in Franklin. It's kind of comical actually. This isn't knocking those who truly believe in Franklin, that he could be a difference maker. This is a dig at those now trying to act like he would be perfect for this team due to nothing other than a number on a selection card. 

 

P.S. ~ I voted to take Franklin here as well, and don't think the perceived sub-par Combine outweighs what you see from him on the game tape. But all of you know, because I have said it time and time again, Legette is my guy. :thumbsup:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, H2o said:

I took Legette for the Commanders because I think the guy is gonna be a beast. I also think the style of offense Kingsbury wants to run warrants the selection. Lastly, I took Legette to let those who were hoping to say "I told you so" about the trade back bask in their utter disappointment. So they would cuss at the monitor or the screen in their hands because the team in front of the Bills took who many of them were hoping to get. 

 

Now people have to reason within themselves and come up with an explanation as to why they believe in Franklin. It's kind of comical actually. This isn't knocking those who truly believe in Franklin, that he could be a difference maker. This is a dig at those now trying to act like he would be perfect for this team due to nothing other than a number on a selection card. 

 

P.S. ~ I voted to take Franklin here as well, and don't think the perceived sub-par Combine outweighs what you see from him on the game tape. But all of you know, because I have said it time and time again, Legette is my guy. :thumbsup:

You!

 

Actually, I think it is completely reasonable that he will be gone if we trade down that far. I'd rather trade down with Arizona. Legette is more likely to be there if we trade down. Trading down into the 40's is way too risky.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, LEBills said:


Have any of the boards picks ever been picked by the Bills?


Ed Oliver for certain.  
 

I can’t remember anyone besides that, but doesn’t mean we haven’t 

Posted
1 hour ago, H2o said:

I took Legette for the Commanders because I think the guy is gonna be a beast. I also think the style of offense Kingsbury wants to run warrants the selection. Lastly, I took Legette to let those who were hoping to say "I told you so" about the trade back bask in their utter disappointment. So they would cuss at the monitor or the screen in their hands because the team in front of the Bills took who many of them were hoping to get. 

 

Now people have to reason within themselves and come up with an explanation as to why they believe in Franklin. It's kind of comical actually. This isn't knocking those who truly believe in Franklin, that he could be a difference maker. This is a dig at those now trying to act like he would be perfect for this team due to nothing other than a number on a selection card. 

 

P.S. ~ I voted to take Franklin here as well, and don't think the perceived sub-par Combine outweighs what you see from him on the game tape. But all of you know, because I have said it time and time again, Legette is my guy. :thumbsup:

Even though one might guess your name to be Richard, everything was true....or a very possible reality.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

Franklin and Coleman are so different to me. I picked Franklin because I can visualize him making a lot of plays in our offense. With Coleman I visualize like a better Gabe Davis, which to me is probably not enough. But I like them both. 

 

I got here too late to vote but would have voted for Franklin. I want nothing to do with Coleman and will be disappointed if the Bills take him with their first pick whether that's the first round or the second. He can't separate and is just a high-point specialist with average speed. He's not the WR that this offense needs.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Who’s the funny guy that picked Benson? You trying to start a riot?

Running back is a real need for the Bills IMO

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...