Tiberius Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 This all would be laughable if it weren’t so serious for American women. Arizonans will now have to travel miles to receive medical care, and many will be unable to overcome the barriers put in their way. This will mean they will be forced to endure unwanted pregnancies. This kind of reactionary view of women’s freedom doesn’t belong in a country that calls itself the leader of the free world. If women aren’t free to make their own decisions, none of us are. It’s time to start calling this barbarism what it really is. https://www.yahoo.com/news/conservatives-no-longer-care-freedom-141416520.html 1
K D Posted April 11 Posted April 11 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: And stadiums? And malls? Concerts, too? Yes, they already do lock down the stadiums and concerts. And who goes to a mall anymore? Lol 1
Doc Posted April 11 Posted April 11 (edited) 2 hours ago, ChiGoose said: They are the dog that caught the car. Abortion was a good issue for the Right while Roe was in place. Now it’s a weight around their necks. You think the JWHO regrets their decision? Or does the political fallout make it worth it? Edited April 11 by Doc 2
K D Posted April 11 Posted April 11 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: This all would be laughable if it weren’t so serious for American women. Arizonans will now have to travel miles to receive medical care, and many will be unable to overcome the barriers put in their way. This will mean they will be forced to endure unwanted pregnancies. This kind of reactionary view of women’s freedom doesn’t belong in a country that calls itself the leader of the free world. If women aren’t free to make their own decisions, none of us are. It’s time to start calling this barbarism what it really is. https://www.yahoo.com/news/conservatives-no-longer-care-freedom-141416520.html Do the babies get a say in this? 3
Tiberius Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 5 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Yes, they already do lock down the stadiums and concerts. And who goes to a mall anymore? Lol But are stadiums fortified? No Malls are still alive--yes on life support--but still breathing Just now, KDIGGZ said: Do the babies get a say in this? They can't even talk, or breathe, on their own, so no 1
Tommy Callahan Posted April 11 Posted April 11 1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said: Do the babies get a say in this? ITs so funny/hypocritical when they use that narrative. After the last few years of them screaming about vaccination status. where was body privacy then? And by the same exact voices. 1
K D Posted April 11 Posted April 11 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: They can't even talk, or breathe, on their own, so no If astronauts found an organism on the moon with living cells and a beating heart it would be the greatest discovery in human history. Meanwhile back on earth, if a woman finds one she can kill it whenever she wants. 2
Tommy Callahan Posted April 11 Posted April 11 1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said: if a woman finds one Stop the assault. its a birthing person. 1
ChiGoose Posted April 11 Posted April 11 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Doc said: You think the JWHO regrets their decision? Or does the political fallout make it worth it? Can’t blame them here. They challenged a law that directly contradicted the Constitution as held by SCOTUS. SCOTUS then decided to change the rules on them. Blaming people for challenging problematic laws instead of blaming the people who pass those laws is an interesting way to burden shift. Edited April 11 by ChiGoose
Tiberius Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 11 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: If astronauts found an organism on the moon with living cells and a beating heart it would be the greatest discovery in human history. Meanwhile back on earth, if a woman finds one she can kill it whenever she wants. Why would something have a beating heart on the moon? There is no oxygen on the moon, and no reason to pump oxygen rich blood, which it could not get 1
Doc Posted April 11 Posted April 11 6 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Can’t blame them here. They challenged a law that directly contradicted the Constitution as held by SCOTUS. SCOTUS then decided to change the rules on them. Blaming people for challenging problematic laws instead of blaming the people who pass those laws is an interesting way to burden shift. The fact remains that they were responsible for RvW being overturned. You know, those 2nd and 3rd order effects were you talking about earlier. 2
ChiGoose Posted April 11 Posted April 11 27 minutes ago, Doc said: The fact remains that they were responsible for RvW being overturned. You know, those 2nd and 3rd order effects were you talking about earlier. No they weren’t. SCOTUS was. I don’t think overturning Roe was even part of the certified question that SCOTUS was asked to address. It’s such a weird and illogical way to look at this. Just trying every trick to excuse the people actually responsible because it makes your side look bad. State passes unconstitutional law Petitioner: hey! That’s unconstitutional SCOTUS: we are changing the constitution to allow things way beyond the law we were asked to look at Internet geniuses: this is the petitioner’s fault. 2
daz28 Posted April 11 Posted April 11 GQP: Step 1: Do something stupid and unpopular. Step 2: Wait to see how the people who aren't stupid, and can think beyond step 1, react to it.
The Frankish Reich Posted April 11 Posted April 11 Ahh, the Ironclad Law. Bad News for Trumpistas = Posting of Stupid Trump as Hero Memes in Every Thread.
TH3 Posted April 11 Posted April 11 4 hours ago, KDIGGZ said: Yes, they already do lock down the stadiums and concerts. And who goes to a mall anymore? Lol Exactly…locking down public places and churches is a price we should all be willing pay for unfettered gun proliferation.
K D Posted April 11 Posted April 11 1 minute ago, TH3 said: Exactly…locking down public places and churches is a price we should all be willing pay for unfettered gun proliferation. Guns have been around this whole time. They didn't lock those things down when I was a kid. So what's different?
TH3 Posted April 11 Posted April 11 41 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Guns have been around this whole time. They didn't lock those things down when I was a kid. So what's different? I have been around the world….you know where they “lockdown” churches, schools, restaurants, sporting events, shopping areas as a matter of routine? The Middle East and Africa….Something to aspire to for for sure. 1
K D Posted April 11 Posted April 11 5 minutes ago, TH3 said: I have been around the world….you know where they “lockdown” churches, schools, restaurants, sporting events, shopping areas as a matter of routine? The Middle East and Africa….Something to aspire to for for sure. Again, we have had guns this whole time. If things are getting worse it has nothing to do with the guns
B-Man Posted April 11 Posted April 11 On 9/1/2022 at 2:04 PM, Tiberius said: Well...I'm pretty sure you guys just handed Democrats a winning issue On 9/1/2022 at 2:26 PM, B-Man said: and saved the lives of thousands of infants, a good trade. .
ChiGoose Posted April 12 Posted April 12 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: Until those kids are born. Then, let them starve and suffer. That’s the GOP way!
Recommended Posts