Dr.Mantis_Toboggan Posted April 5 Posted April 5 Like others have said, I think they are out of the business of paying high dollars for a vet WR. I expect two WRs in the draft, and maybe a signing that I will hate like MVS or OBJ after the draft. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 5 Posted April 5 Just now, JoshAllin said: Mike Thomas anyone? a guy who can’t pass a physical and whose tweets at reporters make Diggs look like an angel by comparison…. Quote
MJS Posted April 5 Posted April 5 I don't want to trade for a guy. I want the Bills to draft a guy high. The Bills need to continue to get younger and cheaper. Go have a good draft and get the pieces you need. 1 1 Quote
Billl Posted April 5 Posted April 5 18 minutes ago, BBFL said: Yeah, you’re right somewhat. But is he having the continued success after Alex Smith; a la Pat Mahomes? He’ll be productive. No doubt. Don’t think he’s coming away with the average of 100 Rec’ / 1238 Yds / 8.6 TDs… That’s a huge average for a WR, let alone a TE. QB and system over 6 years versus the following over 4: 76.8 Rec’ / 975 Yds / 5.5 TDs with Alex Smith. Still elite numbers but not otherworldly like the ones with Mahomes/Reid. QB matters. Every game thread, it’s “why does nobody cover Kelce, he’s always wide open”. Mahomes helps, but elite receivers get their numbers regardless. Metcalf is very good, but he’s nowhere near the hype just as Davis isn’t great, but he’s better than he gets credit for around here. 1 Quote
Einstein's Dog Posted April 5 Posted April 5 DK Metcalf has too many question marks. His salary is already too high IMO. He's in the J Jefferson range and J Jeff would be the much better player to get. I'm talking myself back into Dhop. He is great value at that $13M range - and I think he has much better hands than Metcalf. Dhop would be a great bridge as we develop someone like A Mitchell/Legette/Franklin/McConkey or Coleman. All those rookies are risky though (even BTJ) whereas DHop is a known commodity. Tenn has a high pick, number 7, I believe. Trading to get up there would take too much IMO. But Tenn may want to grab one of the big 3 and then unload DHop. The question would be what would it take draft capital wise. Quote
msw2112 Posted April 5 Posted April 5 (edited) I could live with Hopkins if the Bills could get him for a late round pick and he's only on a 1 year deal. Otherwise, it's not worth it. He's older than Diggs, he's had his share of injuries, and he's more of a possession receiver than a downfield threat. That said, he's got a lot of NFL experience, he's a great route runner that gets open, he has great hands, and his contract is reasonable given his talent level and experience. The Bills should not get stuck in any kind of longer-term deal on an aging WR, particularly after taking the pain this season to move on from one. Regardless of whether they sign a veteran like Hopkins, they still need to draft 1 to 2 WRs this season, ideally one taller guy and one speed guy. Unless they make a major trade up, I don't think they're going to get a guy that's both and even if they get a guy that can do both, it still makes sense to draft 2. Edited April 5 by msw2112 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted April 5 Posted April 5 3 hours ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: I'll refrain from being the guy who said he told everyone so Best we just rectify the multiple errors of 2019 by bringing the man here. I'll refrain from being that guy that points out that I also was banging the table for Metcalf. However, I am humble enough to admit I was wrong about Cody Ford considering everyone seemed to think he was going to go in the first round. 1 Quote
Special K Posted April 5 Author Posted April 5 4 hours ago, CA OC Bills Fan said: Not sure what you mean by "if Seattle eats some of that contract in the way the Bills did with Diggs". Buffalo didn't "eat" Diggs' contract, it's just the way the salary cap works where a signing bonus is paid up front but is amortized over the course of the contract. When a player is traded, what's left of the amortization immediately goes against the cap. This is the first time I've looked at overthecap, but I think I understand it. Metcalf would have a base salary of around $13 million this year and $18 million next year. Seattle would have a dead cap hit of $15 million / $7.5 million this year / next year. Unless they really want to get rid of him, I doubt they'd want to do that. But, I didn't think the Bills would have wanted to take the big hit they did for Diggs, so, what do I know. Well, they could convert 50-66% of this years base salary to a signing bonus before trading him to the Bills with the incentive of a higher draft pick from the Bills in return. That's what I meant by Seattle "eating" some of his contract......not at all sure if that is allowed or if Seattle would be willing to do it. 1 Quote
Gugny Posted April 5 Posted April 5 3 hours ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: I'll refrain from being the guy who said he told everyone so Best we just rectify the multiple errors of 2019 by bringing the man here. You were the most vocal about wanting to draft him. We’d have at least one Lombardi by now. 1 Quote
Ya Digg? Posted April 5 Posted April 5 1 hour ago, Einstein's Dog said: DK Metcalf has too many question marks. His salary is already too high IMO. He's in the J Jefferson range and J Jeff would be the much better player to get. I'm talking myself back into Dhop. He is great value at that $13M range - and I think he has much better hands than Metcalf. Dhop would be a great bridge as we develop someone like A Mitchell/Legette/Franklin/McConkey or Coleman. All those rookies are risky though (even BTJ) whereas DHop is a known commodity. Tenn has a high pick, number 7, I believe. Trading to get up there would take too much IMO. But Tenn may want to grab one of the big 3 and then unload DHop. The question would be what would it take draft capital wise. If Keenan Allen was traded for a 4th, DHop isn’t going for anything more than a 5th and it would think even that’s pushing it Quote
Dick_Cheney Posted April 5 Posted April 5 This would be a dream come true and there is no ***** way it happens lol. Quote
ghostwriter Posted April 5 Posted April 5 I’m hoping we just double down on WR in the draft and take two guys in the 1st/2nd round. Quote
ganesh Posted April 6 Posted April 6 6 hours ago, Special K said: We already paid a FA contract for a WR in Curtis Samuel. The Bills need to get younger and cheaper to keep their cap space in good shape. They need to go to the draft and get some good players who will be here for the next four years. Quote
NoSaint Posted April 6 Posted April 6 6 hours ago, Special K said: I believe he has 2 years and 35 million left on his current contract......if Seattle eats some of that contract in the way the Bills did with Diggs, could a trade for Metcalf be possible? How about a 2nd and 4th this year plus a conditional 2nd that could become a 1st next year for Metcalf and Seattle's 3rd rounder this year. This would still leave the Bills with the ability to draft a WR at 28.....they could go with a smaller speed-type receiver like Xavier Worthy to compliment Metcalf at WR2. An offense of Metcalf, Worthy, Samuel, Shakir, Kincaid, Knox, and Cook would surpass anything any other AFC offense could put on the field!! Lets go, Beane!! remind me - what did the bills eat with diggs? Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 6 Posted April 6 5 hours ago, Beast said: I think there were many, many posters that wanted Metcalf. Not my memory of it 2 hours ago, Gugny said: You were the most vocal about wanting to draft him. We’d have at least one Lombardi by now. Yep Quote
The Jokeman Posted April 6 Posted April 6 2 hours ago, Ya Digg? said: If Keenan Allen was traded for a 4th, DHop isn’t going for anything more than a 5th and it would think even that’s pushing it We'd still have to clear $10 million to add him. I get were getting that close to that on June 1 yet the draft is in April. 2 hours ago, Victory Formation said: I’m hoping we just double down on WR in the draft and take two guys in the 1st/2nd round. We might do a Round 1/6 double down like did with Elam/Benford but suspect the 2nd guy would be more of a return type guy aka 4th/5th roster guy. Quote
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted April 6 Posted April 6 6 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: DK >>>> Gabe Far superior QB play here.....give him the targets Diggs gets.... 115 receptions for 1700 yards and 14 TDs Question is, can he handle Diggs target load? Not likely. Diggs is a do it all type WR in terms of the route tree. I don't see DK as that guy. And does he have the endurance? He's a massive dude. That said, I would be all for bringing in DK, even if it cost us a similar package that brought Diggs here. It's a bit of a gamble because he does only have that one great season but one could argue that was the last season Wilson was good and so the last season DK had an elite QB. Some of the tangibles are certainly still there with him. If we brought him in and he ended up being basically Davis but on a higher level, I think I would be fine with that. I think the team is wanting to go in a direction of spreading the ball around more and not having that one guy that needs to get over 140 targets every year. Quote
ghostwriter Posted April 6 Posted April 6 20 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: 3 hours ago, Victory Formation said: We might do a Round 1/6 double down like did with Elam/Benford but suspect the 2nd guy would be more of a return type guy aka 4th/5th roster guy. We could do that, I’m hoping we follow the Rousseau/Basham approach. This draft is lucratively deep at wideout. I’m hoping for a Brian Thomas Jr/Xavier Legette type of approach with a few OL/bodyguards for Josh in the 4th/5th RD. Quote
QLBillsFan Posted April 6 Posted April 6 7 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said: Seattle is up against the cap but would actually gain $1m in cap space by trading Metcalf. It’s a new coach, so wouldn’t surprise me if they’d move Metcalf for some premium draft picks. Plus Metcalf probably wants new contract as he’s outplayed his current one. Next years 1st plus swap of 2024 2nd for their 2024 3rd plus one of our 4th’s. # 28 is all due to his contract. It’s a historic WR draft. Keep your picks and select 2 WR’s.. still have 9 more to fill in needs. Anything more than that is not a good idea. Quote
uticaclub Posted April 6 Posted April 6 8 hours ago, Billl said: 81 targets for 45 catches, 746 yards, 7 TDS, 56% catch rate and 9.2 yards per target 119 targets for 66 catches, 1114 yards, 8 TDS, 56% catch rate and 9.4 yards per target That’s Gabe and DK. Stats are for losers. Watch how differently they catch the ball Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.