Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's a good write up and I don't wanna be glib, but to an extent I think he arrived last season! To bills fans at least. He'll be known to league wide fans shortly.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, NickelCity said:

It's a good write up and I don't wanna be glib, but to an extent I think he arrived last season! To bills fans at least. He'll be known to league wide fans shortly.

 

I don't disagree, I even referenced his season as a mini breakout last year and some are seeing what I have been saying since 2022, but most are still over looking him and what his potential now is with Diggs gone.  Most still think of him as more of a role player.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I think he’s a lock for our slot WR. And fully expect him to be as good or better than Beasley at his best on the Bills. At a minimum, assuming he’s healthy all season, I fully expect 80+ receptions, 800+ yards, and 7+ TDs. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I don't disagree, I even referenced his season as a mini breakout last year and some are seeing what I have been saying since 2022, but most are still over looking him and what his potential now is with Diggs gone.  Most still think of him as more of a role player.

 

It's not an unreasonable take. I really only frequent TBD, so I'm used to more plugged in bills fans (lol). 

 

Id like to see Shakir add a few Beasley moves to find a soft spots in zones. He has done it, and I can't wait to see more 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, mrags said:

I think he’s a lock for our slot WR. And fully expect him to be as good or better than Beasley at his best on the Bills. At a minimum, assuming he’s healthy all season, I fully expect 80+ receptions, 800+ yards, and 7+ TDs. 

 

If he gets 80 receptions, he will definitely be over 1000 yards.  He is too good after the catch not to be.  Cole was amazing at getting to a spot and making the play to move the chains.  He wasn't the YAC guy that Shakir is, Cole was easy to take down and tackle.  

  • Agree 1
Posted

I'll definitely agree with you on this one, Alphadawg... 

 

Shakir was my favorite Bills breakout last season and he didn't take off quite like I thought he would, but there were glimpses.. especially once Brady took over.

 

Great analysis.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Alphadawg7 said:

 

If he gets 80 receptions, he will definitely be over 1000 yards.  He is too good after the catch not to be.  Cole was amazing at getting to a spot and making the play to move the chains.  He wasn't the YAC guy that Shakir is, Cole was easy to take down and tackle.  

Agree on the comparison or lack of. I am just not sold on him reaching 1k yet. Diggs is the only one to do it since John Browns first year on the team when he was the #1 and barely surpassed 1k with 1,060 yards. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, NoSaint said:

I’ll say again- lance moore, not kupp.

 

who is still a great contributor but not an elite player

 

No disrespect, but I can confidently say he will be a much better player than Lance Moore.  

 

I am not saying he is as good as Kupp, but no one thought Kupp was a WR1 until he had a monster season with Stafford one year and got an insane 191 targets.  For Kupp, it was a change at QB and almost 200 targets to break out into legit WR1 discussions...for Shakir, it might just be the removal of a 160 target hog of Diggs.  But he does pattern his game off of Kupp and studies him, and I felt his college tape reminded me a lot of Kupp even before he said that just in style of play. 

 

Big difference though between Shakir and Kupp is Shakir is quite a bit faster than Kupp down field (4.43 compared to a 4.64 forty time) but Kupp has excellent sudden movement so he plays a lot faster than his 40 time suggests in the short and mid areas of the field where he eats the most.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I think Shakir is a good player. He is versatile. I just don't think he has a super high ceiling. He could develop into a decent #2 receiver or slot receiver, but I don't see him as more than that.

 

But I could be wrong. You never know.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SCBills said:

I still legitimately have no idea what Shakir is tbh. 

 

And thats fair...that just means it will be even more fun for you when you find out this year HA 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I mean, even if he just gets up to 100 targets, that is still a 1,350 yard season

 

It's not a 1:1 comparison but this was the pro-Gabe Davis narrative after 2020. As we found out, yards per target doesn't automatically scale like that. Some players' skill sets shine better when they are low target players.

 

I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong but I think Shakir is one of those players. I see people compare him to Beasley but I think they're almost total opposites. Shakir isn't nearly as sudden as Beasley was on his route breaks which means his success against man will always be limited. If you can't regularly beat man you can't be a high volume target, simple as that.

 

I still love Shakir in his current role though. Strong hands + great YAC is an extremely valuable complementary skillset.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 4
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, MJS said:

I think Shakir is a good player. He is versatile. I just don't think he has a super high ceiling. He could develop into a decent #2 receiver or slot receiver, but I don't see him as more than that.

 

But I could be wrong. You never know.

 

All good, its why I started this thread.  A lot of people feel the same as you, nothing wrong with that.  Honest question...did you watch the highlight video?  I think people forget the kind of plays he was making when he got opportunities.  These were not just a bunch of simple plays.  The route running, concentration, hands, body control, physicality, YAC ability were all on display.  I think people still have a limited view of him based on his draft slot of the 5th round because what he has shown glimpses of on the field is pretty strong.   

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, NickelCity said:

It's a good write up and I don't wanna be glib, but to an extent I think he arrived last season! To bills fans at least. He'll be known to league wide fans shortly.

 

As you can see by the responses here...most still see him as more of a role player as I was saying.  Nothing wrong with that, but this is what I mean when I say I believe everyone is about to see the arrival of Shakir as more than just a role player many think he is.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I am not saying he is as good as Kupp, but no one thought Kupp was a WR1 until he had a monster season with Stafford one year and got an insane 191 targets.  For Kupp, it was a change at QB and almost 200 targets to break out into legit WR1 discussions...for Shakir, it might just be the removal of a 160 target hog of Diggs.  But he does pattern his game off of Kupp and studies him, and I felt his college tape reminded me a lot of Kupp even before he said that just in style of play. 

 

Kupp's route running was special. Shakir's route running is pretty good. He creates space after the catch, not before the catch.

 

If anything Puka Nacua is the stylistic comp you're looking for, although Nacua is 2 inches taller and his arms are 2.5 inches longer. If Shakir can be the poor man's version of what Nacua was last year that's more than satisfactory.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

No disrespect, but I can confidently say he will be a much better player than Lance Moore.  

 

I am not saying he is as good as Kupp, but no one thought Kupp was a WR1 until he had a monster season with Stafford one year and got an insane 191 targets.  For Kupp, it was a change at QB and almost 200 targets to break out into legit WR1 discussions...for Shakir, it might just be the removal of a 160 target hog of Diggs.  But he does pattern his game off of Kupp and studies him, and I felt his college tape reminded me a lot of Kupp even before he said that just in style of play. 

 

Big difference though between Shakir and Kupp is Shakir is quite a bit faster than Kupp down field (4.43 compared to a 4.64 forty time) but Kupp has excellent sudden movement so he plays a lot faster than his 40 time suggests in the short and mid areas of the field where he eats the most.  


kupp had 92 and 94 catches the two years prior tied for 11th and outright 9th in the league with Goff at qb. Stafford is very wr friendly but lets not pretend about kupp

 

being a west coast nfc team he wasn’t a household name especially here but I think he was a wr1 unless you mean wasn’t wr1 for the entire nfl 

 

as for Moore- top 3 seasons would be: 

 

65-1041-6

79-928-10

66-763-8

 

Solid yac guy who did some punt/kick returns. Not a ton but I call it out as a testament to him being able to move with the ball. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted

I’m excited to see what he can do with a full year under Brady, he has great hands, some of his catches in the playoffs were really good! I think he’s earned a spot in the lineup when we have a slot WR on the field. 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

It's not a 1:1 comparison but this was the pro-Gabe Davis narrative after 2020. As we found out, yards per target doesn't automatically scale like that. Some players' skill sets shine better when they are low target players.

 

I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong but I think Shakir is one of those players. I see people compare him to Beasley but I think they're almost total opposites. Shakir isn't nearly as sudden as Beasley was on his route breaks which means his success against man will always be limited. If you can't regularly beat man you can't be a high volume target, simple as that.

 

I still love Shakir in his current role though. Strong hands + great YAC is an extremely valuable complementary skillset.

 

All good, this isn't one of those things where I am going to tell everyone they are wrong.  More just putting it out there now where my level of confidence is, and has always been, with Shakir in this league.  I have done a few of these Calling it now posts and all have been spot on or very close to spot on because I only do it when I really feel it.  And I can't tell you why, but I have just always felt it about Shakir going back to college.  

 

And agree, the Beasley comparison makes no sense at all.  Honestly, those people comparing him to Beasley are just making a lazy comparison because they see them both as slot WRs even though they are not remotely similar as players.  Cole was quick, not fast.  He was smart, not tough.  He was a move the chains slot guy, not a make a big play slot guy.  Don't get me wrong, Cole was a very good slot WR, he was just solely a slot WR and a short area specialist.  Shakir can move inside and outside, he is fast and can beat you downfield.  He isnt as fast as Cole with that sudden movement, but few are, and Shakir is still quick himself with good route running to go with it.  

 

All good, I am glad you at least see him as a valuable player.  But I do think you find out he is more than you are giving him credit for this upcoming season.  And if I am wrong, so be it, he will still be a valuable role player and fun to watch, that much he has already proved. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...