Rich Stadium Original Posted April 4 Posted April 4 Forgive me in advance if this subject came up somewhere in the 116 pages of the Diggs is traded thread, but... Let's assume the Diggs trade had to happen now...why the Texans?...Yes his production is way down, but even at 31 he's still got a lot left in the tank...and you may have handed the team that, at least on paper, seems to now be the most talent laden in the AFC. People certainly would be up in arms if we dealt him to the Chiefs or Bengals, but the Texans may be a tougher "out" this season. My biggest complaint in this whole matter is that Beane couldn't find a trade partner in the NFC, or a team in the AFC searching for a QB and not a threat. Maybe other GMs around the league are wary now that Diggs has whined his way off of two teams, and weren't willing to give up a second round pick. 2 1 1 Quote
Mr. WEO Posted April 4 Posted April 4 who cares? Texans put up numbers on The Cleveland Flaccos, then got roasted by the about to be fully exposed Baltimore MVP's. every time any player moved from one team to an winning AFC rival, posters loose their stool. worry about not falling apart to the Chiefs in the playoffs... 8 1 2 1 1 Quote
BBFL Posted April 4 Posted April 4 For most, Diggs trade was coming at least next year. That’s where I’m at. Why the Texans? It helps them out tremendously. If you’re trading him within the AFC, one of the other South teams would have been good a la KC trading Hill to compete within a rival’s division. Chargers need a guy @ WR given the trades and QJ’s underwhelming performances when in the limelight last season. Maybe you could have thrown him in the mix with some other picks to get up to #5, if trading up that high is a scenario they see themselves looking into. Quote
boater Posted April 4 Posted April 4 6 minutes ago, Rich Stadium Original said: Forgive me in advance if this subject came up somewhere in the 116 pages of the Diggs is traded thread, but... Let's assume the Diggs trade had to happen now...why the Texans?...Yes his production is way down, but even at 31 he's still got a lot left in the tank...and you may have handed the team that, at least on paper, seems to now be the most talent laden in the AFC. People certainly would be up in arms if we dealt him to the Chiefs or Bengals, but the Texans may be a tougher "out" this season. My biggest complaint in this whole matter is that Beane couldn't find a trade partner in the NFC, or a team in the AFC searching for a QB and not a threat. Maybe other GMs around the league are wary now that Diggs has whined his way off of two teams, and weren't willing to give up a second round pick. You answered your own question. Due to Diggs malcontent behavior, it was a market where the buyers had control. Maybe the Texans were the only takers. 4 2 Quote
Success Posted April 4 Posted April 4 The Texans are being overrated. I said it yesterday - people should check their schedule last season. They didn't beat many good teams. They'll have a 1st place schedule this year, and won't catch teams by surprise like they did in '23. Not that they won't be in contention, but they haven't proven much to me yet. 3 1 1 1 1 Quote
SCBills Posted April 4 Posted April 4 Don't think there was much of a market for Diggs tbh. Beane's only real leverage was basically "ok, we'll just keep him then". Once the Texans came up with a 2nd Rounder, yes next year, but also attached to the Vikings, it makes sense. That's potentially a Top 40 pick next year. And while the Texans should win that division.. I am interested to see Stroud in Year 2 against this schedule: Jaguars x2 Colts x2 Titans x2 Home Ravens Bills Dolphins Bears Lions Away Cowboys Packers Vikings Chiefs Jets Patriots 2 Quote
FitzShowUsYourTitz Posted April 4 Posted April 4 17 minutes ago, MJS said: Because they actually offered something for him. Exactly. Doesn’t take much of a brain to realize there were not 30 teams offering the same compensation jeez 😳 2 Quote
Scott7975 Posted April 4 Posted April 4 Because that’s who made us an offer. It’s not like teams were breaking down our door for an over 30 declining receiver that might be a cancer. It is what it is. Doesn’t matter who we traded too. Was KC worried about trading Hill to Miami? 7 Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted April 4 Posted April 4 20 minutes ago, FitzShowUsYourTitz said: Exactly. Doesn’t take much of a brain to realize there were not 30 teams offering the same compensation jeez 😳 This was Diggs preferred destination and Beane did right by him, I’m not convinced this was the best offer on the table. 1 4 Quote
Don Otreply Posted April 4 Posted April 4 50 minutes ago, Rich Stadium Original said: Forgive me in advance if this subject came up somewhere in the 116 pages of the Diggs is traded thread, but... Let's assume the Diggs trade had to happen now...why the Texans?...Yes his production is way down, but even at 31 he's still got a lot left in the tank...and you may have handed the team that, at least on paper, seems to now be the most talent laden in the AFC. People certainly would be up in arms if we dealt him to the Chiefs or Bengals, but the Texans may be a tougher "out" this season. My biggest complaint in this whole matter is that Beane couldn't find a trade partner in the NFC, or a team in the AFC searching for a QB and not a threat. Maybe other GMs around the league are wary now that Diggs has whined his way off of two teams, and weren't willing to give up a second round pick. Why the Texans? Because they made the highest offer out of every team that may have been interested in obtaining him, it’s really that simple. 2 2 Quote
DrBob806 Posted April 4 Posted April 4 45 minutes ago, Success said: The Texans are being overrated. I said it yesterday - people should check their schedule last season. They didn't beat many good teams. They'll have a 1st place schedule this year, and won't catch teams by surprise like they did in '23. Not that they won't be in contention, but they haven't proven much to me yet. Kinda sounds like our team, ouch. 1 Quote
Green Lightning Posted April 4 Posted April 4 Some look at the Texans and say why? Beane looks at the Texans and says why not? 1 1 Quote
Mat68 Posted April 4 Posted April 4 2nd rder was too high to pass up. Similar trades are mid round picks at best. 1 Quote
nucci Posted April 4 Posted April 4 (edited) 57 minutes ago, Rich Stadium Original said: Forgive me in advance if this subject came up somewhere in the 116 pages of the Diggs is traded thread, but... Let's assume the Diggs trade had to happen now...why the Texans?...Yes his production is way down, but even at 31 he's still got a lot left in the tank...and you may have handed the team that, at least on paper, seems to now be the most talent laden in the AFC. People certainly would be up in arms if we dealt him to the Chiefs or Bengals, but the Texans may be a tougher "out" this season. My biggest complaint in this whole matter is that Beane couldn't find a trade partner in the NFC, or a team in the AFC searching for a QB and not a threat. Maybe other GMs around the league are wary now that Diggs has whined his way off of two teams, and weren't willing to give up a second round pick. because they called Edited April 4 by nucci 1 Quote
Success Posted April 4 Posted April 4 3 minutes ago, DrBob806 said: Kinda sounds like our team, ouch. Well, except for the whole "beating the eventual SB champs at their house" thing.... 1 1 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted April 4 Posted April 4 59 minutes ago, Rich Stadium Original said: Forgive me in advance if this subject came up somewhere in the 116 pages of the Diggs is traded thread, but... Let's assume the Diggs trade had to happen now...why the Texans?...Yes his production is way down, but even at 31 he's still got a lot left in the tank...and you may have handed the team that, at least on paper, seems to now be the most talent laden in the AFC. People certainly would be up in arms if we dealt him to the Chiefs or Bengals, but the Texans may be a tougher "out" this season. My biggest complaint in this whole matter is that Beane couldn't find a trade partner in the NFC, or a team in the AFC searching for a QB and not a threat. Maybe other GMs around the league are wary now that Diggs has whined his way off of two teams, and weren't willing to give up a second round pick. After how he ended the season...we sure about that? The league will pretty much dictate where you trade someone. A few seasons back the Ravens trades Orlando Brown to the Chiefs. Why? Because they likely offered the best trade package. Same likely happened here. When making moves you make them based on what helps your club the most. Secondary reasoning would be what may or may not be a tougher "out" after 17 games and into the playoffs. Quote
MJS Posted April 4 Posted April 4 (edited) Look at what other teams got trading their wide receivers this offseason. Keenan Allen was traded for a 4th rounder. Jerry Jeudy was traded for a 5th and 6th. Getting a 2nd for Diggs is actually pretty good, and only the Texans were willing to give that. Edited April 4 by MJS 2 1 6 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.