Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Diggs is better than any rookie until proven otherwise, which is a complete unknown.  With 30 mil dead cap next season.  It was a bad decision. 


I do not believe this is true. Right now Spotrac is showing that we take Diggs $27M cap number off the books for 2025. That could change as this whole thing gets finalized, but it won't be $30M regardless. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bkep32 said:

lets call cole beasly, maybe he still wants to play

I think Sammy Watkins is available

 

2 hours ago, Nineforty said:

reset almost complete. I'm good with this. 

Can we reset the head coach? Ill be ecstatic! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

why is everyone acting like we're taking an additional 31 million?  It's an additional 3-4 million hit.  That's it. 

 

57 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

Because most people don't know how the cap works.

Or, it's because you still have to pay for the player you don't have anymore while going out and getting another one. It's money you flushed down the drain with no return. In other words, you could have had Diggs for free had you just kept him and it would have saved you $3m.

Posted
Just now, Mango said:


I do not believe this is true. Right now Spotrac is showing that we take Diggs $27M cap number off the books for 2025. That could change as this whole thing gets finalized, but it won't be $30M regardless. 

There is no dead cap on a traded player the season after. All dead cap gets moved to the year they were traded. It's one of the reasons people thought he couldn't be traded, the Bills have taken on a massive dead cap hit but have cleared the books (saving 25ish mil) next season. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, AZSanta said:

I think Sammy Watkins is available

 

 

At this point bring in Jerry Butler and Frank Lewis :)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

I think it’s a good trade. Diggs gave us some good years. We’re taking a step back this year. The second round pick is a good return for a player around 30. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Honestly, i could see Diggs getting all pissy when finding out were drafting a WR in the first round, knowing that he will have to split the limelight with someone else.

 

Diva and drama queen?.....absolutely

Aging and self-centered?........yep

Missed?.........we won't miss a beat

 

Bravo Beane.........bravo.

 

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)

I don’t think this was originally the plan. That tweet from Diggs had to have been the last straw. No way you just let your top two WR’s walk out the door. The fact that they didn’t get more for Diggs and traded him within the conference says they just wanted to be done with him. 
 

 

Edited by BillMafia716ix
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Were we winning with McDermott with the last four playoff performancesby his defense? 

I mean really it is past time especially with Belichick available. 

If you have read any of my posts concerning the defense…, 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Sweats said:

 

 

 

 

 

Boo hoo......like Beane is going to leave the team with no legit WR?!?

 

....need a tissue?

No, I’m a mature adult, 45 year fan, who uses metrics.  I’m not a sycophant like you who relies on a generalized statement not even on point.

 

I use information and past performance to render my opinion.  You clearly just drink some Beane WR Kool Aid (Jim Jones did too).  I’m just a realist.  Beane isn’t the second coming and look at his WR picks.  Aside from the Diggs trade (which could have beenJefferson) and Shakir I remember the great Kelvin Bryant trade, Harry, Sherfield and those draft picks Zay Flowers gone ASAP, Ray-Ray McCloud (who is PR but not good WR), Hodgins (gone) and Proehl.

 

Yeah, I’m the one who’s wrong.  And, grow up and act like a mature adult who can discuss matters.  

Posted
31 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

i agree, the plan was not to trade Diggs. But if Josh said" that's enough, cant take the ***** anymore from this dude"..then he gots to go. Josh way more important than 14

IMO, this played a large part in it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Bruffalo said:

There is no dead cap on a traded player the season after. All dead cap gets moved to the year they were traded. It's one of the reasons people thought he couldn't be traded, the Bills have taken on a massive dead cap hit but have cleared the books (saving 25ish mil) next season. 

 

That is what I thought, but was waiting for spotrac to finalize it. 

It isn't all that massive. It is $3M more than his cap hit on the roster. 

Basically the Bills spent $3M in 2024 cap dollars today in order to free up $25M in 2025 cap dollars. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Magox said:

 

No offense CT, but you and over half the board went nuts when Beane traded away Watkins and it ended up being a tremendous move.

 

Diggs did play at an underwhelming level through the last half of the season and has not played at a high level through the playoffs throughout his career.   

 

No doubt that replacing Diggs regular season production will be tough, but the Bills did play their best football when Diggs went virtually absent.  He is turning 31, he is not on the upswing, he is on the decline.

 

Will he play at a pro bowl caliber level this next year?  I wouldn't bank against that possibility, he will be highly motivated and Stroud will want to get him the ball, but I think it's evident that he didn't want to be a Bill any longer.

 

The Bills have a very good TE in Kincaid who from my perspective will be a pro bowl level TE who could very well see 100 receptions this year.  Shakir has shown lots of great signs of being a quality receiver, Curtis Samuel is a nice player plus Cook is a weapon from the backfield.   So there is a solid young nucleus of weapons who are all on the upswing.

 

I have no doubt that the Bills will obtain another high quality prospect and possibly two more to round out the receiving room.

 

This Diggs move will free up $27 Million in cap space in 2025, which means that Beane will have money to go after another high end FA next year.

 

 

Look at the weapons Brady had in some of his super bowl years, Gronk and Welker and a bunch of system JAGS and Brady was able to distribute the ball around for years.   Look at Mahomes the past two years, Kelce and JuJu were his best weapons the year before and last year it was Kelce and a rookie in Rasheed.

 

The point is that Elite QB's make receivers look good and the nucleus of weapons that are already on the team and the draft ahead of the Bills should be able to put up more offensive weapons than Mahomes has had the past two years.

 

 


I am sure I didn’t go “nuts” about the trade itself but I am sure I was angry about the lack of investment in the position.  Same as now.  They’ve known who this guy is for several years and they should’ve been loading up on young talent to replace him instead of chasing to fill the gap when we’re weeks away from rookies reporting.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mango said:


I do not believe this is true. Right now Spotrac is showing that we take Diggs $27M cap number off the books for 2025. That could change as this whole thing gets finalized, but it won't be $30M regardless. 

 

Spotrac already has the $31M.  Also, 2025 cap (after Beane lets Von go will be about $40M in cap space.

 

This move was smart and it all depends on what kind of WR room Beane gives Allen and how he and Brady

can make it work.  NO ONE is going to know this till the fall.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, BullBuchanan said:

 

Or, it's because you still have to pay for the player you don't have anymore while going out and getting another one. It's money you flushed down the drain with no return. In other words, you could have had Diggs for free had you just kept him and it would have saved you $3m.


Every single team in the NFL does this at some point with a big contract guy. Every single one.

 

It was either this off-season or next off-season when the Bills were unloading Diggs.

 

End of story.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

 

Or, it's because you still have to pay for the player you don't have anymore while going out and getting another one. It's money you flushed down the drain with no return. In other words, you could have had Diggs for free had you just kept him and it would have saved you $3m.

They are going to go out and add players in the draft either way and were going to have to pay for them.  It's 3m extra on this years cap.  Not that big of a deal to be honest and it's not like they were going to go out and find someone better than anyone currently on the team for that amount of money.

Posted
1 minute ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Ehh, only if you count 2025 because the team loses 3 million this year. Which, if you want to make a case for 2024 being a hard rebuild I could have swallowed it, but if that was the case Beane should not have bothered bringing in street free agents. Why gobble up more cap room if the point is to purge the old guard and draft fresh?

 

The only thing I can imagine is Diggs did something Antonio Brown crazy that somehow was out of the news, and Beane had to ship him out for pennies on the dollar.

 

Yes, I count 2025.  The cap is a multidimensional game where one dimension is time, and Beane has shown in the past he's willing to take a near-term hit for long term cap gains.

I don't think Diggs did anything close to "Antonio Brown Crazy" to the extent we know now, but I think it's worth revisiting the start of the AB drama in Pittsburgh

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2019/01/nfl-steelers-antonio-brown-ben-roethlisberger-trade-beef-history

 

Quote

Roethlisberger did not see Brown running wide open, and the receiver was visibly upset on the sideline. Those things happen in the heat of the game. No big deal, right?

 

Big Ben then called AB out on causing a distraction:
 

Quote

“He got upset because he was open, which I can understand, sometimes that happens. I was disappointed because it’s not like I intentionally missed him, it’s not like I intentionally didn’t throw it to him. I was doing what my reads tell me to do, I don’t even want to say I made a mistake, because I was reading the side I was supposed to read. It’s just unfortunate that it happened, and it’s unfortunate that he acted and reacted that way … [Brown] is causing a distraction that none of us really need.”

 

AB later opined he made Big Ben as a QB and said something eerily similar to Diggs recent tweet:
image.thumb.png.9709bb15d32e64bf179e48c0133035c0.png

Now in this case, Diggs is going to a team with a legitimate, very very promising young passer.  So his future looks bright.

And Allen doesn't call out teammates publicly.  

 

But there are more similarities here than I initially thought.

 

 

Posted

I think this is going to end up somewhere between an "A" grade and Ditka trading an entire draft for Ricky Williams, Minnesota trading an entire draft for Herschel Walker, and the Browns trading away all of their draft capital for Deshaun Watson.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...