Apocalypse Nuts Posted April 9 Posted April 9 5 hours ago, Richard Noggin said: Whether Glab's hot mic take was accurate or not was never really the issue for me, as much as "Team reporter gets caught absolutely blasting #1 WR's character and does NOT get fired for it." Interesting…I never thought about it like that. Says a lot in hindsight Quote
papazoid Posted April 9 Posted April 9 8 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: 😡 josh delivered a dime to diggs and only got back his two cents On 4/6/2024 at 9:15 AM, BillsFan2313 said: 3 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted April 9 Posted April 9 17 hours ago, Augie said: I always thought the “next year’s pick” was overly discounted by some and applies mostly when you have a regime who is less secure in their standing so they need to win now. I like future picks if you get them discounted. I mean, you end up using them! Agreed. Teams get what they can (obviously). They discount early picks differently. I’ve heard that divide first round picks into 3 tiers and second round picks into 2. IOW a late first this season is worth a top half of the second next, etc. Projecting where a team is likely to pick next season is a big factor. Quote
nucci Posted April 9 Posted April 9 10 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: 😡 professional football players playing catch....incredible to watch 1 Quote
yall Posted April 9 Posted April 9 3 hours ago, Apocalypse Nuts said: Interesting…I never thought about it like that. Says a lot in hindsight Honestly what she said wasn't all that bad and provided you didn't take it in the most absolute literal way possible it didn't even portray Diggs that badly either. 1 3 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 9 Posted April 9 (edited) 14 minutes ago, nucci said: professional football players playing catch....incredible to watch Building a bond. Bills haven’t done this since 2020. Mahomes literally runs his own passing camp at his house every year. Edited April 9 by Buffalo_Stampede 1 Quote
Chugga Posted April 9 Posted April 9 Maybe I just watch the wrong sports media but I’m blown away by how this has played out. Every single offseason the national media basically said that Diggs was a malcontent that was causing friction on his team and with his QB. He’d throw out those famous cryptic tweets and every media outlet would take 30 minutes deciphering how unhappy he was. His brother flat out trashed his QB and Josh did nothing. Now Diggs is traded and Josh Allen fed up after 1 loss makes an offhand remark (mind you no one seems to know what Diggs said before that remark) and that’s the whole story now. The Bills got robbed, Diggs is going to be part of one of the best offenses in the league, he’s suddenly a top 5 WR again. But man Josh Allen yelled at him ONCE. Just crazy how it all flipped. 1 1 Quote
Dr. K Posted April 9 Posted April 9 14 hours ago, FLFan said: I had a different take on his on field demonstration after the KC game. I viewed it at the time as trying to draw attention to himself. Gabe was the potential hero of that game let’s not forget, not Diggs. That’s why he was demonstrating on the field. Me, me me. You are talking about two different games. The one where Diggs stood out on the field afterward watching the Chiefs celebrate was the AFC championship game the Chiefs won 38-24. The 13 seconds game where Gabe scored four touchdowns was a year later in the divisional round, and I don't remember Diggs doing any on-field demonstration after that game. 1 1 Quote
4merper4mer Posted April 9 Posted April 9 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Dr. K said: You are talking about two different games. The one where Diggs stood out on the field afterward watching the Chiefs celebrate was the AFC championship game the Chiefs won 38-24. The 13 seconds game where Gabe scored four touchdowns was a year later in the divisional round, and I don't remember Diggs doing any on-field demonstration after that game. There are so many false narratives about Diggs, why pick nits on this one? Edited April 9 by 4merper4mer Quote
Buffalo716 Posted April 9 Posted April 9 49 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Building a bond. Bills haven’t done this since 2020. Mahomes literally runs his own passing camp at his house every year. You have no proof that Josh Allen does not work out with his receivers in the off season You're talking about a kid who had a world class work ethic now all of a sudden since he got good he's a bum with getting chemistry with teammates 2 4 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted April 9 Posted April 9 I see no reason for Josh Allen and the Bills WRs needing to get together to practice before the draft. There is plenty of time after the draft. Let the guys have a couple of months off. 5 Quote
90sBills Posted April 9 Posted April 9 1 hour ago, nucci said: professional football players playing catch....incredible to watch Professional football players making time in the offseason to get together without any obligations truly is incredible. Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 9 Posted April 9 I wonder why the Texans didn’t hold any type of press conference after trading for Diggs. Quote
TheFunPolice Posted April 9 Posted April 9 I mostly worry about what this means for the direction of the team. I could see McDermott looking like the Jack Nicholson meme nodding yes maniacally at posts suggesting KC "won with defense" so we need to invest all our resources there and Allen will figure something out on offense. Quote
FLFan Posted April 9 Posted April 9 1 hour ago, Chugga said: Maybe I just watch the wrong sports media but I’m blown away by how this has played out. Every single offseason the national media basically said that Diggs was a malcontent that was causing friction on his team and with his QB. He’d throw out those famous cryptic tweets and every media outlet would take 30 minutes deciphering how unhappy he was. His brother flat out trashed his QB and Josh did nothing. Now Diggs is traded and Josh Allen fed up after 1 loss makes an offhand remark (mind you no one seems to know what Diggs said before that remark) and that’s the whole story now. The Bills got robbed, Diggs is going to be part of one of the best offenses in the league, he’s suddenly a top 5 WR again. But man Josh Allen yelled at him ONCE. Just crazy how it all flipped. Trashing Buffalo and the Bills is a national pastime. This is nothing new. 1 Quote
GASabresIUFan Posted April 9 Posted April 9 (edited) The more I read about Josh and DIggs this seems like addition by subtraction. The Bills have a new OC, the Bills went 7-2 with that OC and a diminished role for Diggs. Josh was much better at spreading the ball around to Shakir, Kincaid and Cook who rewarded him by catching 80% of his throws as opposed to Davis and Diggs who caught 61% or less. The Bills also clear an expensive Prima Donna out of the locker-room. We may look back at the Diggs trade and call it Josh Freedom Day. Now Josh can literally scan the field and throw to who is open instead of force feeding Diggs to keep him happy. I wonder if the dropped ball against KC was the last straw for Diggs in Buffalo. People are justifiably worried about how we make up the 241 targets, 152 catches, 1926 yards and 15 TDs that walked out the door with Diggs and Davis. Add in Harty, Murray, Sherfield and Harris and you have another 67 Targets to re-allocate. I'd argue that this is a classic Moneyball situation where we'll make up for the loss in the aggregate. Josh targets a Receiver (TE, RB or WR) about 550 times per season. Next season Knox (36 targets), Kincaid (91), Shakir (45) and Ty Johnson (7) all should have expanded roles with Kincaid likely going form 90 to 120 targets and Shakir going as high as 85 or 90. Beane signs UFAs Samuel (92 tgts) and Hollins (30) and I can easily see them repeating those numbers in Buffalo. Now add a high draft pick at WR to the mix. Davis, as a rookie, was targeted about 65 times, and that seems like a reasonable place to start for a new player. Kincaid 91 --> 120 Shakir 45 --> 90 Samuel 92 --> 90 Rookie WR 0 --> 65 Cook 54 --> 60 Knox 36 --> 50 Hollins 30 --> 30 Johnson 7 --> 30 Others 6 --> 10 This allocation would actually decrease the throws to the receivers (from 330 to 280), but increase the usage of the TEs (from 130 to 170). This would be a much more balanced passing attack and make it much much harder to defenses to defend. Edited April 9 by GASabresIUFan 5 1 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted April 9 Posted April 9 24 minutes ago, GASabresIUFan said: The more I read about Josh and DIggs this seems like addition by subtraction. The Bills have a new OC, the Bills went 7-2 with that OC and a diminished role for Diggs. Josh was much better at spreading the ball around to Shakir, Kincaid and Cook who rewarded him by catching 80% of his throws as opposed to Davis and Diggs who caught 61% or less. The Bills also clear an expensive Prima Donna out of the locker-room. We may look back at the Diggs trade and call it Josh Freedom Day. Now Josh can literally scan the field and throw to who is open instead of force feeding Diggs to keep him happy. I wonder if the dropped ball against KC was the last straw for Diggs in Buffalo. People are justifiably worried about how we make up the 241 targets, 152 catches, 1926 yards and 15 TDs that walked out the door with Diggs and Davis. Add in Harty, Murray, Sherfield and Harris and you have another 67 Targets to re-allocate. I'd argue that this is a classic Moneyball situation where we'll make up for the loss in the aggregate. Josh targets a Receiver (TE, RB or WR) about 550 times per season. Next season Knox (36 targets), Kincaid (91), Shakir (45) and Ty Johnson (7) all should have expanded roles with Kincaid likely going form 90 to 120 targets and Shakir going as high as 85 or 90. UFAs signees Samuel (92) and Hollins (30) and I can easily see them repeating those numbers in Buffalo. Now add a high draft pick at WR to the mix. Davis, as a rookie, was targeted about 65 times, and that seems like a reasonable place to start for a new player. Kincaid 91 --> 120 Shakir 45 --> 90 Samuel 92 --> 90 Rookie WR 0 --> 65 Cook 54 --> 60 Knox 36 --> 50 Hollins 30 --> 30 Johnson 7 --> 30 Others 6 --> 10 This allocation would actually decrease the throws to the receivers (from 330 to 280), but increase the usage of the TEs (from 130 to 170). This would be a much more balanced passing attack and make it much much harder to defenses to defend. This is what I keep saying. Make the D defend the entire field, not one guy. Quote
Augie Posted April 9 Posted April 9 2 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said: This is what I keep saying. Make the D defend the entire field, not one guy. Brady used to piss me off when he’d start a game with 11 straight completions to 8 different guys. 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.