Diggs traded to Texans for picks

[LABILLBACKER]

43 minutes ago, Aimee75 said:

There has been a ton of talk about Diggs wanting out, and a lot of "I told you so!!" from sports pundits who knew this. Shady McCoy flat out said Diggs would be going to Houston, and Joe Mixon pretty much outed this whole situation with his tweet about how Diggs asked for the trade to Houston, and got his wish. I personally didn't even need to know about this stuff to figure it out. He has made it pretty clear he was unhappy, his brother was always vouching for him to get out of Buffalo. The writing was on the wall. I don't know how much say or not Josh had in it, but I don't think he was going to try and stop it, and on some level he may be relieved.

I'm sure Josh to some degree is relieved.  He's probably tired of the drama outbursts, diva attitude and having to feed Stef at the expense of not throwing to other players. Yes Diggs will go down as a great Bills receiver.  But ripping off the bandaid and freeing up cap for next year makes perfect sense.  Now let's really do something bold and draft wrs in the first 2 picks.

[Coffeesforclosers]

One day, Oh Happy Day, there will be a 100+ page thread on this forum that doesn't wallow in past losses.

 

But hey, let's keep rehashing and reliving stuff. That's healthy. 

[Sweats]

I was watching the NFL network last night and the whole show was dedicated to the Diggs trade.

Now, a lot of good points were brought up...

 

* Everyone suspecting a rift between Diggs and JA......management telling JA that they were planning to let Diggs go and no argument from JA

* Bills FO would rather cut their losses now when they could actually get something for Diggs rather than waiting a year and his stock plummeting

* Swapping draft picks (the Bills get next years 2nd and Houston gets this years 5th and 6th from us) is basically a "push" and in fact, works out better for us for next year

* Houston will not tolerate Diggs' outbursts and make sure he's on a short leash.....and basically, Houston has nothing to lose with Diggs cause if he fails, he was worth a bag of peanuts, but if he succeeds, he can be yet another threat for Stroud

* It seems both parties are happy with the outcome of the trade

* The Bills can finally focus on getting younger and creating a team properly and not have to worry about an aging cancerous boat anchor who criticizes the team/FO/HC at every turn.......that's the fans job

[SectionC3]

2 minutes ago, papazoid said:

the bills will absolutely replace diggs. we will have another WR1 to get excited about.

 

vegas says the bills are a Top 5 team.....and likely to remain that way as long as Josh is healthy.

 

COACHING is what's holding this team back.

 

McClappity isnt even smart enough to run 13 seconds off the clock to close out a game.

 

Squibb the kickoff (run 3 seconds off clock)

1st down - instead of laying 15 yards off kelce and tyreek....you do the exact opposite. get up on the line and deliberately mug them. commit a 5 yard penalty (run another 2-3 seconds off clock)

1st down (2nd play) - repeat penalty (run more time off)

1st Down (3rd play) - do it again

1st Down (likely final play - defend a hail mary

This.  All day long.  That’s my beef with 13 seconds. 

[Sweats]

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

This.  All day long.  That’s my beef with 13 seconds. 

 

 

 

I'm fairly certain you can only do it once......if you try it a 2nd time, the time stays on the clock and the play is played-over on the same down.

[LABILLBACKER]

7 minutes ago, papazoid said:

the bills will absolutely replace diggs. we will have another WR1 to get excited about.

 

vegas says the bills are a Top 5 team.....and likely to remain that way as long as Josh is healthy.

 

COACHING is what's holding this team back.

 

McClappity isnt even smart enough to run 13 seconds off the clock to close out a game.

 

Squibb the kickoff (run 3 seconds off clock)

1st down - instead of laying 15 yards off kelce and tyreek....you do the exact opposite. get up on the line and deliberately mug them. commit a 5 yard penalty (run another 2-3 seconds off clock)

1st down (2nd play) - repeat penalty (run more time off)

1st Down (3rd play) - do it again

1st Down (likely final play - defend a hail mary

Game day coaching will always hold this team back.

[Low Positive]

38 minutes ago, Logic said:

Right. There's also the factor of getting the $10 million from Tre White's release after June 1st. So I think the Bills will still be able to sign all of their picks, have the practice squad and "emergency fill-ins" funds that Beane likes, and still sign another player or two.

In theory, paying $31 million for a player not on your roster hurts. In practice, it's only $3 million more than they were already going to be paying Diggs anyway. For whatever reason, they concluded they'd rather pay an extra $3 million to have Diggs NOT be on the roster and to get a draft pick. Clearly, things had gone sour enough that it was worth the added cost to them.

And lastly...while many are stating their disappointment with the compensation the Bills received, I actually think it's quite impressive. It's not much less than what the Panthers just got for Brian Burns, a 26 year old edge rusher in his prime. It's slightly more than the Chiefs just got for L'Jarius Sneed, a young player at a premium position. It's more than fellow receivers Diontae Johnson, Amari Cooper, and Jerry Jeudy fetched, and those guys are all younger than Diggs. Count me among the minority of fans who actually think the Bills did quite WELL getting a 2nd, ESPECIALLY since that pick belongs to the Vikings, who --if they start Sam Darnold at QB this year -- could wind up picking in the top 10 of the draft next year. We could be looking at, say, the 39th pick. Not bad for a WR who basically wasn't a factor in our offense over the past 9+ weeks of the season.

I agree with what you say here, but I think that it's important to note that the Bills are not paying Diggs 31 million to not play for them. They are taking a 31 million dead cap hit. That 31 million is money that has been already paid to Stef that we now have to add to the cap due to the trade. Saying that the salary cap is accounting is not saying that it doesn't exist. It's saying that the real money distributed to players in any given year is vastly different from the cap allocations. 

 

Also, for the record, I was absolutely certain that Diggs would play 2024 in Buffalo because that cap hit would be too much. I was wrong. @Warriorspikes51 was right. I am owning this because I believe that part of being a functioning adult is the capacity to admit when you were wrong about something. 

[SoonerBillsFan]

8 minutes ago, Sweats said:

I was watching the NFL network last night and the whole show was dedicated to the Diggs trade.

Now, a lot of good points were brought up...

 

* Everyone suspecting a rift between Diggs and JA......management telling JA that they were planning to let Diggs go and no argument from JA

* Bills FO would rather cut their losses now when they could actually get something for Diggs rather than waiting a year and his stock plummeting

* Swapping draft picks (the Bills get next years 2nd and Houston gets this years 5th and 6th from us) is basically a "push" and in fact, works out better for us for next year

* Houston will not tolerate Diggs' outbursts and make sure he's on a short leash.....and basically, Houston has nothing to lose with Diggs cause if he fails, he was worth a bag of peanuts, but if he succeeds, he can be yet another threat for Stroud

* It seems both parties are happy with the outcome of the trade

* The Bills can finally focus on getting younger and creating a team properly and not have to worry about an aging cancerous boat anchor who criticizes the team/FO/HC at every turn.......that's the fans job

I am betting Allen has his best season yet in 24'

[Low Positive]

8 minutes ago, Sweats said:

 

 

 

I'm fairly certain you can only do it once......if you try it a 2nd time, the time stays on the clock and the play is played-over on the same down.

You can't even do it once. Here is a quote from page 51 of the NFL rulebook:

Quote

ARTICLE 3.  INTENTIONAL FOULS TO MANIPULATE GAME CLOCK. A team may not commit multiple fouls during the same down in an attempt to manipulate the game clock.

 

 Penalty: For multiple fouls to run off time from the game clock: Loss of 15 yards, and the game clock will be reset to where it was at the snap. After the penalty is enforced, the game clock will start on the next snap. 

It's a 15-yard penalty and they reset the clock.

 

Read it for yourselves: https://operations.nfl.com/media/tvglh0mx/2023-rulebook_final.pdf 

Edited April 4 by Low Positive

[f0neguy]

Hey mods!   Got a suggestion for you. Would it be possible to have 13 seconds automatically inserted into every topic on the board?  Think about all of the time and keystrokes it would save!

 

Concerning Diggs,  I’m kinda glad he’s moving on.  First couple of years here he was great.  Last couple of years from a fan’s perspective he seemed to be a distraction.  As long as we’ve got 17, we’re in every game.  I’m looking forward to the season.   Go Bills!

[SectionC3]

9 minutes ago, Sweats said:

 

 

 

I'm fairly certain you can only do it once......if you try it a 2nd time, the time stays on the clock and the play is played-over on the same down.

Yes.  Exactly right.  

[Beck Water]

54 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

At the end of the day, this team is missing nearly 2,000 yards and 15 passing TDs of production from Diggs & Davis on last year's team.  That's about half of Allen's passing production.

 

If it were that easy to replace that with a pair of 5th round WRs and a seven year vet that's averaged 500 yards & 3 TDs, then we wouldn't be talking about drafting a WR in rounds 1 & 2 or if possible, getting a high-priced veteran WR.  

 

We're looking more like the Ravens than ever.  

 

1929 yds, but what's 71 yds between friends?  

 

But let's look at it a bit differently.  Dorsey was fired after the Bills fell to 5-5 vs the Broncos.  They then went on a 7-1 streak with 1 overtime loss to the Eagles.

 

During that stretch of the season, which featured gameplans and play calling from the same OC we will have next year, Diggs and Davis together contributed a total of 627 yds, plus 73 yds in 2 playoff games.  Diggs contributed 1 TD, Davis contributed 2 - including playoffs.

 

Elsewhere, you have been beating the drum loud and repetitively about how Diggs fell off in the 2nd half of the season, comparing him to all sorts of lower tier WR we could have signed for much less.

Given that, it's really something to turn coat and gloom-and-doom because the Bills have moved on from two guys who contributed 3 TDs (including in 2 playoff games) and 627 yds over a 7-1 streak.

 

My position all along has been that the whole season counts when assessing a guy's contributions, but C'Mon Man, don't act like Diggs is Chopped Liver in one thread and then tear your hair and smear ashes about after he's traded.

 

It's a valid point that Beane, McDermott, and Joe Brady may have looked at that 7-1 win streak under Brady as OC and said "we can do without 627 yds and 3 TDs contribution".

[eball]

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

It's a valid point that Beane, McDermott, and Joe Brady may have looked at that 7-1 win streak under Brady as OC and said "we can do without 627 yds and 3 TDs contribution".

 

Boom goes the dynamite.

 

[Augie]

28 minutes ago, CirclnWagons said:

Riddle me this, in an obvious rebuild year, why not let Trubisky take several more snaps to save Josh’s body and build trade value for himself in the future? With Josh’s physical style of play, taking serious body blows in a season not setup to see more than 4-6 wins just doesn’t make sense to me. Crazy take but what else can you say 

 

Have you quit already? How about we wait for like…..IDK….the draft, and games and stuff. 

 

You seriously think this is a 4-6 win team? I’ll take the over for as much as you want, and I don’t gamble. The over doesn't seem like much of a gamble, however. 

 

 

.

Edited April 4 by Augie

[Reed83HOF]

12 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

 

I won't mind a big move, bit draft wise I’m not sold that anyone other than Harrison is worth more of a move up than it takes for Thomas. I may need to watch some more Malki Nabers and Rome Odenzu highlights.  

If the vikings win about 6 games again next season and we end up in the same spot, the 2 seconds could get you to around 21 or 23...

 

Trading for a wr and having to pay them, just loads the cap right back and aside from JJ, I'm not sure we go that route. A cost controlled 5 year contract and now relying on Allen to elevate the WR should be the expectation.

 

It's not like needing to get a young allen a reliable vet type wr when we traded for Stef. 

 

We all know beane is aggressive, he values traits and is always willing to swing a trade up. I just feel that with missing out on Mcduffie and even WRS last year, he is not going to sit and be overly patient. He is going to go get his guy. Best way to shut the media and everyone up is to fill this huge whole in a big way. That cap money next offseason will go towards the D is my guess as of now....

 

 

 

Edited April 4 by Reed83HOF

[Low Positive]

I'm sure that Beane, Brady, and McDermott are also looking at Shakir's stats beyond the total yards which is more a matter of targets. Shakir led all NFL WRs in 2023 in 

• Catch%
• Success%
• Yards per target

Shakir caught the ball when it was thrown to him and made big plays. The major thing holding him back was a limited number of targets (45). That should probably change. 

[Beck Water]

15 minutes ago, Sweats said:

I was watching the NFL network last night and the whole show was dedicated to the Diggs trade.

Now, a lot of good points were brought up...

 

* Everyone suspecting a rift between Diggs and JA......management telling JA that they were planning to let Diggs go and no argument from JA

* Bills FO would rather cut their losses now when they could actually get something for Diggs rather than waiting a year and his stock plummeting

* Swapping draft picks (the Bills get next years 2nd and Houston gets this years 5th and 6th from us) is basically a "push" and in fact, works out better for us for next year

* Houston will not tolerate Diggs' outbursts and make sure he's on a short leash.....and basically, Houston has nothing to lose with Diggs cause if he fails, he was worth a bag of peanuts, but if he succeeds, he can be yet another threat for Stroud

* It seems both parties are happy with the outcome of the trade

* The Bills can finally focus on getting younger and creating a team properly and not have to worry about an aging cancerous boat anchor who criticizes the team/FO/HC at every turn.......that's the fans job

 

Thanks for all this.

 

Just a little nit, the pick swap is next year's 2nd that Houston received indirectly from the Vikings, but the trade-back is this year's 6th and NEXT YEAR'S 5th (which is considered equivalent to a 6th round pick this year).

I kind of wonder if uncertainty about Tank Dell's recovery from his broken leg plays into this - if he's not 100% early in the season, they can put him on a snap count or even IR him and expect more from Diggs, but if Diggs does the mid-season vanishing he's done for the last 2 seasons, Dell should be up to speed and they can cut Diggs snaps, then move on the following year if he beefs.

 

I frankly thought in his presser, Beane seemed a bit nervous and defensive, with good reason.  He acknowledged that the team isn't as good right now after the trade: "This is by no means the Bills giving up or trying to take a step back or anything like that. Everything we do, we're trying to win, and we're going to continue to do that. It's April the 3rd, and we'll continue to work on this roster and make sure we're ready to play come September" "I mean, are we better today? Probably not," Beane admitted. "It's a work in progress, and we're going to continue to work on that. I just hope people know I'm competitive as hell, and I ain't giving in, we're going to work through this and continue to look and I'm confident in guys on the roster, and confident in the staff we have upstairs that helps me, that we'll continue to find pieces to add, and we'll be ready to roll when it comes time in September."

Did someone on NFL network really express something like "not have to worry about an aging cancerous boat anchor"?  Wow if so, Just Wow - do you remember who might have said that?  

[Nephilim17]

10 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

1929 yds, but what's 71 yds between friends?  

 

But let's look at it a bit differently.  Dorsey was fired after the Bills fell to 5-5 vs the Broncos.  They then went on a 7-1 streak with 1 overtime loss to the Eagles.

 

During that stretch of the season, which featured gameplans and play calling from the same OC we will have next year, Diggs and Davis together contributed a total of 627 yds, plus 73 yds in 2 playoff games.  Diggs contributed 1 TD, Davis contributed 2 - including playoffs.

 

Elsewhere, you have been beating the drum loud and repetitively about how Diggs fell off in the 2nd half of the season, comparing him to all sorts of lower tier WR we could have signed for much less.

Given that, it's really something to turn coat and gloom-and-doom because the Bills have moved on from two guys who contributed 3 TDs (including in 2 playoff games) and 627 yds over a 7-1 streak.

 

My position all along has been that the whole season counts when assessing a guy's contributions, but C'Mon Man, don't act like Diggs is Chopped Liver in one thread and then tear your hair and smear ashes about after he's traded.

 

It's a valid point that Beane, McDermott, and Joe Brady may have looked at that 7-1 win streak under Brady as OC and said "we can do without 627 yds and 3 TDs contribution".

If people are going to count what's "missing" it's disingenous for them to not count the 864 yards what's been added with Samuels and Hollins.

I think with Josh throwing to Samuels and us getting a first-round receiver we close the gap on many of the remaining yards. Plus Shakir and Kincaid and Cook should be even better with experience and Brady having time to implement his offense.

[nucci]

35 minutes ago, CirclnWagons said:

Riddle me this, in an obvious rebuild year, why not let Trubisky take several more snaps to save Josh’s body and build trade value for himself in the future? With Josh’s physical style of play, taking serious body blows in a season not setup to see more than 4-6 wins just doesn’t make sense to me. Crazy take but what else can you say 

Surely you can't be serious?

[billykay]

25 minutes ago, Sweats said:

 

 

 

I'm fairly certain you can only do it once......if you try it a 2nd time, the time stays on the clock and the play is played-over on the same down.

Or the refs call Unsportsman like Conduct.