Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Idk what happened or when but Josh and Diggs seamed off.  Allen’s play the last few years has been better throwing to the open guy instead of force feeding Diggs.   Wish him the best he was a great player for us. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

What a joke. The best receiver we’ve had in 20 years and away he goes. Pathetic. Looks like more of a step back this season than I thought. 

Or you could expand your thought process and think long term.  

 

 

Posted

Feel like we gotta trade up into the top 10 now. I don't know. This feels like an absolute disaster despite Diggs' age and potential decline we saw last season.

  • Disagree 2
Posted

Wow the compensation seems brutal.

 

Anyway, like I said, he was always tradeable this year. I just thought it would be for 1st this year so we can draft his replacement. This seems crazy.

  • Agree 2
Posted

I think this means they are totally ready to give up their first round pick next year to move up this year and get the receiver they want. Having Minnesota’s second rounder, would make them more willing to do this.
 

Young wide receivers are stepping right in and becoming superstars pretty quickly these days.

 

They gave up a first to get him, had several years of great production, and get a second rounder in return after all of that. On paper, it’s not awful, but they sure as hell better fill that spot, proper, or they’re wasting a year of Josh. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

Why would we not wait until after June 1st to lessen the blow if there was no picks we were getting in this draft?  That makes no sense to me

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

A 2025 2nd round pick! 

Beane got had.

This is all to placate McD's fragile ego. 

This is really stupid move for this year.

Only way Beane recovers from this is to mortgage multiple picks to move up and get one of the top 3 WR. 

Sad sad day when you chose the loser HC over the guy that was the heart and soul of the team for years. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 8
  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Dislike 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mango said:

Guys, can't be real. His contract is not tradable. 

we need DATA and what has actually occurred here.  I thought the same as you regarding his contract. We were basically "stuck with him" I thought due to his contract  and potential cap hit

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Einstein said:

@GunnerBill - I told you that where there is smoke, there is fire.

 

 

 

I wasn't saying there was no general smoke. I was saying I didn't think there was smoke based on what that reporter was saying given he had just got 2 major shouts wrong in free agency that same week. But maybe he did know something on this one. Although I suspect he was somewhat just spitballing.

Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Some people owe me an apology.

 

Despite an entire year of saying "Diggs costs $3M more off the roster than he does on" it is hard to believe that there were still people going "tHirTy OnE MiLliOn DoLlArS". 

He was always tradable, the restructure put the cap risk on Buffalo. If Diggs is "meh" and not worth $18M AAV after this year (or any year) they can move on with basically zero cap implication. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...