Donuts and Doritos Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Sounds like Beane's going with a position of need that has less depth than receiver UNLESS he has the receiver graded higher. That doesn't sound good for pick 28. It sounds rational. But does have me wondering what round he'll take a WR? Unless it's smoke. Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted March 26 Posted March 26 We all knew the team of McBeane was going defense. 1 1 Quote
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Rule of thumb, don’t trust a single word from any GM this time of year… 11 12 4 Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 18 minutes ago, Donuts and Doritos said: Sounds like Beane's going with a position of need that has less depth than receiver UNLESS he has the receiver graded higher. That doesn't sound good for pick 28. It sounds rational. But does have me wondering what round he'll take a WR? Unless it's smoke. Beane has always said this. I have been trying to remind a lot of people of this around here who have this expectation its a WR or nothing else at 28 no matter who is on the board, and that is just something they are going to be potentially disappointed in. The only way he takes a WR at 28 is if that player is absolutely BPA on his board. If not, then he is trading up to get one if one he covets gets within range, taking another position and then looking at WR in round 2 (maybe even trading up for one in round 2), or even trading back at 28 and picking up more draft ammo and taking a WR then. He absolutely will not REACH for a WR at 28...anyone thinking otherwise is going to be disappointed. 8 10 5 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 26 Posted March 26 20 minutes ago, Donuts and Doritos said: Sounds like Beane's going with a position of need that has less depth than receiver UNLESS he has the receiver graded higher. That doesn't sound good for pick 28. It sounds rational. But does have me wondering what round he'll take a WR? Unless it's smoke. It really shouldn't be much of a shock. That's been the way Brandon has run the draft almost every year since he's been here. 3 3 Quote
wjag Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Hopefully Center is on their need list... Repurposing guys who played guard to be center is liking putting putty in dam holes. 3 1 1 5 Quote
Logic Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) I expect one of three outcomes. Which one happens will depend on who is on the board when the Bills pick. 1. A receiver they really like begins to fall, and they make a small move up to get him. Think Brian Thomas Jr. 2. They draft a non-WR player at 28 (edge or safety likely), then use day 3 pick(s) to move up higher in the 2nd round and draft a WR. 3. They trade down from 28 into the 2nd round and add a 3rd round pick (Beane was expecting one, and I bet he wants to have one). They then use their two 2nd round picks on a WR and a defensive player. One thing is for sure: Even WITH the player exodus and lean free agency period, they won't be using all 11 picks. There's just no way. Expect movement up and down the board. Edited March 26 by Logic 4 6 1 Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted March 26 Posted March 26 What we think McBeane will do: 1st: WR 2nd: S 4th: C 4th: WR What McBeane will do: 1st: DT 2nd: DE 4th: S 4th: CB 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 Quote
frostbitmic Posted March 26 Posted March 26 If he says anything other than BPA don't believe him. Quote
Blackbeard Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Beane is one of THE BEST GMs in the league. I have full faith in him. 9 2 2 1 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted March 26 Posted March 26 7 minutes ago, Blackbeard said: Beane is one of THE BEST GMs in the league. I have full faith in him. Because he has hit on so many defensive picks esp. The DL and ignored giving our Franchise QB a 1st round talent at WR right? But hey he is here to stay, so it is what it is. 3 3 6 1 2 Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted March 26 Posted March 26 1 hour ago, SoonerBillsFan said: We all knew the team of McBeane was going defense. Every year....you can set your watch to it.... 2 Quote
Logic Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Just now, SoonerBillsFan said: Because he has hit on so many defensive picks esp. The DL and ignored giving our Franchise QB a 1st round talent at WR right? But hey he is here to stay, so it is what it is. Bills Scoring Offense rankings the past four seasons: 2nd 3rd 2nd 6th Bills Scoring Defense rankings the past four seasons: 16th 1st 2nd 4th The Bills have won the second most games in the league since 2020. The Bills have been top 6 in preseason Super Bowl odds the past four seasons. Winning more games than everyone but the Chiefs, being consistently above average on both offense and defense, and being considered one of the five or six best teams in the league year in and year out seems like an indication that the team's GM is fairly good at his job. Looking at each move in a vacuum -- "Beane failed to draft impact player X", "Beane failed to burnish positional group X with the draft capital I would've liked" -- ignores the reality of looking at the team as a whole: The Buffalo Bills have been very good for several years now. It also fails to mention the moves he's made that have been SUCCESSES. Ultimately, to suggest that the man in charge of building the roster for a team this consistently good is, himself, bad at his job, well...I strongly disagree. 4 2 7 13 Quote
Shaw66 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 There are no mysteries. Beane has always been very clear about how he will handle the draft. The problem is that the fans have their own views about needs and who's available in the draft, so they concoct all sorts of theories about what Beane is going to do. Here's what Beane is going to do: 1. Evaluate the players available and rank them. 2. Look for players the Bills covet at any position who may be falling to where the Bills pick. 3. Maybe trade up to get one they like. 4. Do all of this with an understanding, THEIR understanding, of what the Bills need. Their understanding and ours may be very different. This season, in particular, their understanding of whether the Bills need a receiver and what kind of receiver may be very different from ours. Their understanding of where to get what they need may also be very different from ours. 3 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 I think Beane is taking a WR with his first pick. I don't think that will be at #28. (1) A move up to the late teens for Thomas (2) A drop back to the low 40s for Franklin, McConkey, Legette, Worthy, etc - whomever drops to there and a couple will. It depends on who they are targeting, if they are targeting Thomas and if Thomas drops to the high teens. My gut is it's either Thomas at 17-19 or Franklin at 35-42 4 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted March 26 Posted March 26 1 hour ago, Alphadawg7 said: Beane has always said this. I have been trying to remind a lot of people of this around here who have this expectation its a WR or nothing else at 28 no matter who is on the board, and that is just something they are going to be potentially disappointed in. The only way he takes a WR at 28 is if that player is absolutely BPA on his board. If not, then he is trading up to get one if one he covets gets within range, taking another position and then looking at WR in round 2 (maybe even trading up for one in round 2), or even trading back at 28 and picking up more draft ammo and taking a WR then. He absolutely will not REACH for a WR at 28...anyone thinking otherwise is going to be disappointed. Part of being a good GM is understanding your own weaknesses. I hope Beane understands that his board is not infallible. Which is no slight against him - nobody's draft board ends up being even close to right when all is said and done. If you're right even 50% of the time you're one of the best to have ever done it. All the talk about BPA assumes there is some kind of objective BPA. But of course there isn't one. So Beane should make the pick that is most likely to have a high impact ceiling on the team. Any WR he takes that turns out even just a decent 1st round pick will end up being a 1,000+ yard WR. Just like Kincaid ended up breaking franchise records. So drafting what he thinks is the best WR available is hitting the easy button on maximizing the 1st round pick. Drafting, say, Chop Robinson is hitting the hard button. That pick isn't likely to have the impact of a 1,000 yard WR. Do the easy thing. Get the franchise a likely win out of our 1st round pick. 6 2 Quote
H2o Posted March 26 Posted March 26 32 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said: What McBeane will do: 1st: DT 2nd: DE 4th: S 4th: CB 6 Quote
Mr. WEO Posted March 26 Posted March 26 “Ya see, gotta get me one-uh-them CORNERBACKS!…maybe an undersized D lineman. Ahm still rattlin it round in ma BRAIN” Quote
Gambit Posted March 26 Posted March 26 23 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: Because he has hit on so many defensive picks esp. The DL and ignored giving our Franchise QB a 1st round talent at WR right? But hey he is here to stay, so it is what it is. While I'm on team WR for RD 1, did people forget we drafted Kincaid in RD1 last year? Sure, he's not a WR but it's not like he isn't a awesome weapon for Allen. 2 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.