Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, BillStime said:

1,237 days

 

a.thumb.jpg.dff996b7eb75995e3cebb173b7f8ce20.jpg

An election is only deemed most secure ever by the side that appears to have the most votes…👍

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 ⬆️ 

 

Supports efforts to sexualize kids in school.


👆Hoax but you do support the slaughter of Americans.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.ccb24589fa637ac087f6facda1404442.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.9e4e11aadc8aa0ab2c39235a1dea5c76.jpeg

Posted

 ⬆️ 

 

Doesn't care that a Russian spy, Igor Danchenko, was the primary sub source of the Steele dossier.

 

Russian spies bad!!!

 

Unless they can Get Trump.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 ⬆️ 

 

Doesn't care that a Russian spy, Igor Danchenko, was the primary sub source of the Steele dossier.

 

Russian spies bad!!!

 

Unless they can Get Trump.

 

👆🤣 - Karen doesn’t care that the Steele dossier has nothing to do with the FACT that:

  • The Trump campaign met with the Russians 140+ times.
  • The Trump campaign manager shared polling data with Russians.
  • The Russians hacked the DNC and RNC.
  • The Trump campaign coordinated Wikileaks dumps.

Karen keeps embarrassing herself.  

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Any argument that 2020 was a more secure election than any of the previous ones for at least 100 years is stupid and intentionally ignorant. Everytime you add an additional  layer  between the voter and machine you add a chance of malfeasance/incompetence. Every time you don't verify the voter you greatly increase the chance of malfeasance. And if the vote is not done quickly and efficiently you add in the ability to mess with it. All three of these items were present in 2020, and GA and PA had them in huge amounts. These points are inarguable to an intelligent person, the only question is what conclusions we teach from these facts.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Not to mention President Jimmy Carter and James Baker did a report together, in the early 2000s, arguing why mail in voting was not good for our elections due to overwhelming potential for fraud…

 

I’m sure we’ve seen plenty of suspicious videos of people making multiple trips, to drop of multiple ballots, to drop boxes…

 

Heck, vote counting was even halted on the night of the 2020 election so that more mail in votes could be added…

 

1 day of voting (make it a national holiday), where photo IDs are required…It’s just too important not to take every precaution necessary to ensure ACTUAL secure elections…👍

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Any argument that 2020 was a more secure election than any of the previous ones for at least 100 years is stupid and intentionally ignorant. Everytime you add an additional  layer  between the voter and machine you add a chance of malfeasance/incompetence. Every time you don't verify the voter you greatly increase the chance of malfeasance. And if the vote is not done quickly and efficiently you add in the ability to mess with it. All three of these items were present in 2020, and GA and PA had them in huge amounts. These points are inarguable to an intelligent person, the only question is what conclusions we teach from these facts.

 

It's a BIG LIE to say any of the above.

 

<_<

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 9/27/2024 at 8:45 AM, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:

 

 

Now we know why she pulled her resources from NC. She can't win there without cheating. On to the next. PA will be where they cheat. They need more people on the ground to stop the steal

 

 

  • Angry 1
Posted
On 3/24/2024 at 4:51 PM, BillStime said:

1,237 days

 

a.thumb.jpg.dff996b7eb75995e3cebb173b7f8ce20.jpg

 

All you needed was another Election to show what an absolute BS election mail in voting scheme the 2020 Election was.

 

What is the difference in Democratic nominee votes in 2020 vs 2024?  What is the difference in the swing states like PA, Arizona, and Georgia?

×
×
  • Create New...