Motorin' Posted March 21 Posted March 21 2 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said: I like the way Brady started using him later in the year. Early in the year, those OTB check-downs, literally anyone can do that stuff. You play to Kincaid's strengths by using him down the seam and on the Y cross stuff, which is what Brady started doing. So I have super high hopes. Kincaid is a dude. The way he was used in the second half of the season showed me that he can put up #2 receiver numbers in the coming years. The question is, how high is the ceiling? 2 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 21 Posted March 21 10 minutes ago, Nephilim17 said: According to @Beck Water, a poster who rarely lies, Kincaid had 46% of his yards after catch. I would guess that's the best on the team. 311/673, #mathforall Of guys with >20 receptions, James Cook was unsurprisingly the best YAC man, which of course, is what you expect from an RB. 89% YAC. Of the receivers, Shakir also had 46% of his YAC, 7.2 Y/R. Knox was similar to Kincaid in Y/R and had a slightly higher percentage (but only 22 receptions to Kincaid's 73) 1 Quote
Don Otreply Posted March 21 Posted March 21 31 minutes ago, ganesh said: He needs to catch the balls more in stride. His YAC after was very limited It is better stated that his QB needs to be better at hitting him in stride so he can get more YAC…, that and according to a poster (Beck Water) up thread 46% of his yards were YAC so there is that, 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 21 Posted March 21 8 minutes ago, Don Otreply said: It is better stated that his QB needs to be better at hitting him in stride so he can get more YAC…, that and according to a poster (Beck Water) up thread 46% of his yards were YAC so there is that, I do appreciate the kind words, but I also posted data, so it's more correctly "according to the data". Quote
Don Otreply Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Just now, Beck Water said: I do appreciate the kind words, but I also posted data, so it's more correctly "according to the data". True enough, 👍 Quote
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 21 Posted March 21 3 hours ago, NewEra said: Agreed….but he must add some mass. @Chandler#81 discusses Kincaid not breaking tackles and I think strength is the main culprit behind his lack of BTK. He looked to take pounding when he did lower his shoulder in the regular season. I was worried about injuring and was actively rooting for him to avoid hard contact. Hopefully an offseason in the weight room will give the kid the strength he needs to break more tackles. I don't know about breaking tackles, but so many of the catches I've seen are dump off routes where contact his made at the moment of the catch and he still pushes forward for a few more yards. He especially carved out a niche for blitz beaters, as that became a big part of the gameplan near the end of Dorsey. As a reminder, Gabe Davis was on the blitz beater in the Eagles game. You know the one. Kincaid has things to work on for his game for sure. He can put on some muscle this offseason and work on his blocking technique, but if you look at Zach Ertz's first two years in the league Kincaid's production is right there. 2 Quote
folz Posted March 21 Posted March 21 4 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: Now for the discussion part. It’s not an overly optimistic highlight reel. He was clearly great in college and Beane wanted this dimension for the team. However, for a pass catching TE, he had numerous drops and very rarely broke tackles. His TD production was -in a word, disappointing. But the pure talent was on display for most of the season. With Knox taking a pay cut recently, Dalton is now clearly TE1. But he can and needs to improve. He is a willing blocker though his relatively slight frame doesn’t scare anyone and is more of a ‘get in the way’ type blocker than physical blocker. While he made numerous eye-popping catches, he underwhelmed in contested catches where his size should have been a benefit. He displays deft footing but he doesn’t use this to break tackles when defenders dive at his lower legs. It was obvious by seasons’ end that if a defender was closing in on him, he was going to be tackled -even though there were opportunities to challenge the tackler with changing speed or direction, stiff arming or lowering his shoulder -something Knox is proficient at. I’m hoping these were discussed with him in his end of season meeting with coaches as aspects he needs to improve on. Bulking up a bit is essential, but also hand fighting, better body control to fend off would-be tacklers near him and more gumption/desire to finish the play in the Endzone. Yes, he set team records for catches by a TE and quickly became a starter. But to know the full history of the team, is to know TE has always been an afterthought. I can count on 1 hand our very best TE’s, from Warlick to -well, Knox.. The potential is certainly there, but the necessary upgrades to his skills are on him to develop. To me, he’s kinda like a ‘golly gee! This is great playing in the NFL!’ kid. I’d like to see more of a determined approach to his craft to realize his capabilities at this level. He isn’t there yet. What say you? I usually agree with you on a lot of things Chandler, but I think you're being a bit too pessimistic when it comes to Kincaid. First of all, he was just a rookie. I think that we all hope and expect him to progress and get better from his rookie year. Most players take a big leap between year one and year two if they have enough talent to make it in the league...and I think Dalton proved he is a guy that will make it in the NFL. He also had Dorsey as an OC for half the year (where the offense struggled quite a bit) and then had to switch to a new coordinator mid-season. That could have hindered some of his growth/progress. As others have noted, I don't think drops seem to be an issue with him. No one is going to catch every ball. But according to stats, he had 4 drops (on 91 targets/73 receptions) on the year and an 80.2% catch rate. That's actually very good for a rookie and no where near the struggles that say Gabe and Knox have had.. I only noted maybe 3-4 contested balls in that video that maybe he could have caught. Don't really see this as a major issue either. Something he can work on, sure, but not a problem by any means at that rate. The TD total was definitely disappointing, but we'd really have to look at the whole season to see how he was used in the red zone, how many red zone targets did he get, etc. to determine if it is a Dalton-thing or a scheme-thing. Maybe Knox got more red zone plays when healthy due to size and previous high TD totals, etc. I do expect to see that TD total climb in the future, but I almost think that that is more on Joe Brady (scheme) and Josh Allen (trust) than it is on Dalton. BUT, the points I really wanted to make were these: 29 of Dalton's 73 receptions went for a first down. That is 40%. Forty percent of his catches went for first downs. That is huge for the team...keeping the chains moving, something we have missed since Beasley left. 311 of his 673 yards came AFTER contact. Yes, almost half of his yards were YAC. And that is with the fact, as others have pointed out, that many of his catches were either short over the middle, screens, or outlet passes---all of which are plays where the defenders (especially over the middle) are very close and ready to make an immediate tackle. They didn't design a lot of plays for Dalton to be streaking down the seam or sideline, where it is easier to run away from a defender and pick up a lot of RAC. And let's compare his rookie year to the rookie year's of some recent great Tight Ends: TE ROOKIE SEASON STATS Dalton 73 recs. 673 yards. 2 TDs. 80.2% catch rate. 9.2 yards/rec. 29 first downs. 1 fumble. Gronk 42 recs. 546 yards. 10 TDs. 71.2% catch rate. 13 yards/rec. 30 first downs. 1 fumble. Kelce 67 recs. 862 yards. 5 TDs. 77% catch rate. 12.9 yards/rec. 46 first downs. 4 fumbles. (Note this was year 2 for Kelce, he sat his entire rookie year. Kittle 43 recs. 515 yards. 2 TDs. 68.3% catch rate. 12 yards/rec. 24 first downs. 0 fumbles. Dalton had the most receptions. Only Kelce had more yards (in year two, of course). Dalton had the best catch percentage. Only Gronk, really, had more first downs. So, the only place where Dalton fell behind is yards/rec. and TDs (well, basically only to Gronk)---and I think both of those things are more dependent on scheme and opportunity than Dalton lacking anything. I think the only reason people may think that Dalton didn't live up to the billing enough (other than his TD totals) is because of the year that Sam LaPorta had. But LaPorta is the exception to the rule, having had one of the best rookie TE seasons in the history of the NFL. And again, that isn't just skill, but also circumstances, situation, and opportunity. LaPorta had 120 targets compared to Dalton's 91...and Sam played 83% of his team's snaps, while Dalton played 63% of his team's snaps. If you pro-rate Dalton's stats to 120 targets, it would look like this in compariosn. Dalton 96 recs. 887 yards. 3 TDs. LaPorta 86 recs. 889 yards. 10 TDs. So, again, it is only the TD totals that would separate them. Dalton had an excellent rookie season for a TE and I think we all know there is still a lot of room for growth and development (such as in the blocking department, etc.), but I see no reason why Kincaid can't or won't continue to improve and be a big part of the success of this team. Nothing from his rookie season makes me worry about his not reaching his potential and being an important player for this team for years to come. 1 1 Quote
GETTOTHE50 Posted March 21 Posted March 21 comparing laporta to kincaid isnt exactly fair. dan campbell was a tight end and ben johnson is a top offensive coordinator. laporta was getting featured no matter what. kincaid had freakin ken dorsey as his oc in the start of his career. 1 Quote
Chandler#81 Posted March 21 Author Posted March 21 (edited) 7 hours ago, Shaw66 said: I say you've taken an overly pessimistic view, in several respects. He had 670 yards in receptions, which was right around where I expected him to be. That's a nice total for a rookie, especially for a tight end. A rookie wideout who starts has an opportunity for some chunk plays that a tight end doesn't get. So, I'd say his production was pretty good, and I expect it will improve. Next, I'd say that "he rarely broke tackles" is unfair. A large number of his catches were essentially dumpoffs over the middle where he was surrounded by defenders. He's not a big guy who's going to drag those tacklers. Still, he always goes down going forward, and he gets just about all the yards he can. He had several plays where he made a move to avoid a tackler and get extra yards, and in particularly he made several to get the first down. He's not a great open field runner, but he gets ahead in space before he goes down. Drops. I agree about that. He's excellent when he's open, but he isn't so good on contested catches. In a crowd, he doesn't seem to come down with it as often as he should. One thing that was apparent was how often Allen's throws were off target. Some of his drops really were throws where Allen missed the market, and some of his best catches also were on inaccurate throws. I agree about bulking up. He looks like he could carry another ten pounds, and then would make him tougher to bring down. I wouldn't call him a disappointment at all. However, if he's never better than he was as a rookie, I will be disappointed. My hope for 2024 is that Brady will have a creative passing attack with Diggs, Samuel, and Shakir attacking all over the field, short and long, and with Kincaid finding plenty of holes as the defenders chase the speed guys. You’re certainly entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to disagree. He needs to beef up and work on his moves. I took a completely blind look at his rookie performance. Uneven -even though at times he shined. But Thanks, Dad.. 4 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: I don't know about breaking tackles, but so many of the catches I've seen are dump off routes where contact his made at the moment of the catch and he still pushes forward for a few more yards. He especially carved out a niche for blitz beaters, as that became a big part of the gameplan near the end of Dorsey. As a reminder, Gabe Davis was on the blitz beater in the Eagles game. You know the one. Kincaid has things to work on for his game for sure. He can put on some muscle this offseason and work on his blocking technique, but if you look at Zach Ertz's first two years in the league Kincaid's production is right there. This is all I’m saying 🤷♂️ Edited March 21 by Chandler#81 Quote
Chandler#81 Posted March 21 Author Posted March 21 5 hours ago, Rigotz said: I really, really hate it when people say stupid things like this. SO, tell us again how they could have waited and still gotten the same production. I recommend the Ignore function. This poster has a permanent residence there Quote
Fan in Chicago Posted March 21 Posted March 21 5 hours ago, Nephilim17 said: According to @Beck Water, a poster who rarely lies, Kincaid had 46% of his yards after catch. I would guess that's the best on the team. Waitaminnutt You are saying @Beck Water sometimes does lie? 🤔 2 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 21 Posted March 21 25 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said: Waitaminnutt You are saying @Beck Water sometimes does lie? 🤔 Beautifully, and with a frank, direct expression. Can't think of a time I've lied here, but I have been mistaken at times. 1 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted March 21 Posted March 21 He's going to be so good And while he leave he wasn't trucking people like Gronk I felt like he continually fell forward and will use his elusiveness better with time Quote
Beck Water Posted March 22 Posted March 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, Buffalo716 said: He's going to be so good And while he leave he wasn't trucking people like Gronk I felt like he continually fell forward and will use his elusiveness better with time I noticed he had a number of first downs where he lowered his shoulder and/or used his legs as he fell, to get the first. There was also that heads-up play on the Diggs fumble where he swatted the ball OOB - we took a penalty, but we didn't risk a turnover, smart IMO Edited March 22 by Beck Water 1 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted March 22 Posted March 22 6 minutes ago, Beck Water said: I noticed he had a number of first downs where he lowered his shoulder and/or used his legs as he fell, to get the first. There was also that heads-up play on the Diggs fumble where he swatted the ball OOB - we took a penalty, but we didn't risk a turnover, smart IMO I definitely have been enamored with him since Utah Since I've been to a lot of quarterback camps around the country I tend to follow certain quarterbacks that I've seen I've always liked cam rising and his toughness and smarts.. so when he transferred to Utah I started watching more And Dalton instantly pops I think I started jumping around my house when we drafted him lol 1 Quote
Fan in Chicago Posted March 22 Posted March 22 3 hours ago, Beck Water said: Beautifully, and with a frank, direct expression. Can't think of a time I've lied here, but I have been mistaken at times. Is this one of those times? Quote
billybrew1 Posted March 22 Posted March 22 15 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: Now for the discussion part. It’s not an overly optimistic highlight reel. He was clearly great in college and Beane wanted this dimension for the team. However, for a pass catching TE, he had numerous drops and very rarely broke tackles. His TD production was -in a word, disappointing. But the pure talent was on display for most of the season. With Knox taking a pay cut recently, Dalton is now clearly TE1. But he can and needs to improve. He is a willing blocker though his relatively slight frame doesn’t scare anyone and is more of a ‘get in the way’ type blocker than physical blocker. While he made numerous eye-popping catches, he underwhelmed in contested catches where his size should have been a benefit. He displays deft footing but he doesn’t use this to break tackles when defenders dive at his lower legs. It was obvious by seasons’ end that if a defender was closing in on him, he was going to be tackled -even though there were opportunities to challenge the tackler with changing speed or direction, stiff arming or lowering his shoulder -something Knox is proficient at. I’m hoping these were discussed with him in his end of season meeting with coaches as aspects he needs to improve on. Bulking up a bit is essential, but also hand fighting, better body control to fend off would-be tacklers near him and more gumption/desire to finish the play in the Endzone. Yes, he set team records for catches by a TE and quickly became a starter. But to know the full history of the team, is to know TE has always been an afterthought. I can count on 1 hand our very best TE’s, from Warlick to -well, Knox.. The potential is certainly there, but the necessary upgrades to his skills are on him to develop. To me, he’s kinda like a ‘golly gee! This is great playing in the NFL!’ kid. I’d like to see more of a determined approach to his craft to realize his capabilities at this level. He isn’t there yet. What say you? I loved his hands and I think you are being too hard on his drops…. He has very good size and I think he is a tough individual that will improve at all aspects of toughness, blocking, becoming harder to tackle, using size and strength to get open…. what I don’t like about about him is his speed, quickness, and overall athleticism (aside from his hands). I think he has NFL quality in all those phases but he is not elite in any of them. The Bills definitely need a few blue chippers to win a Super Bowl and I fear we missed out again. Looks like another red chipper to go with Groot, Ed and all of the best of Beane’s draft picks. We need home runs and all we ever get are singles, doubles and triples…. I think TJ and Gabe were triples given their draft position. Dawkins was a triple too (maybe an hiomer he is maybe on the line) and perhaps White was a Homer but that was 2017…. The Bills have to have a draft more like the 2017 draft this year…. We need a true blue and two red chippers at least, imho… i really hope I’m wrong about Kincaid. Quote
Chaos Posted March 22 Posted March 22 17 hours ago, folz said: That is huge for the team...keeping the chains moving, something we have missed since Beasley left KIncaid had a fine rookie season, and projects to be a top tier tight end in the future. However, the "moving the chains problem since Beasely" is a myth, based on statistics, In 2021 the Bills had the fifth fewest punts in the NFL (chiefs had least). In 2022 the Bills had the fewest punts in the NFL. In 2023 the Bills had the second fewest punts in the NFL. The Bills did not have problem moving the chains. Quote
Fan in Chicago Posted March 22 Posted March 22 7 hours ago, billybrew1 said: The Bills have to have a draft more like the 2017 draft this year…. We need a true blue and two red chippers at least, imho… i really hope I’m wrong about Kincaid. I am pretty sure you are wrong but this season will show us more. I think he did very well in his rookie season and appears to be a good kid. So I expect him to work on his craft and improve. Let us temper expectations about his stats though. Presuming we add a blue chip WR in the first round, there will be a lot of good hands for Allen to throw to. On the Chiefs, Kelce is their #1 receiving threat. Kincaid doesn't and should not need to be that for the Bills. WR should be primary and TE for blocking, making lot of first downs and scoring TDs. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.