All_Pro_Bills Posted April 22 Posted April 22 19 hours ago, BillStime said: Election interference The inmates are truly in charge of the asylum. How can a candidate interfere with an election where they're a candidate of a major political party running an active campaign?
L Ron Burgundy Posted April 22 Posted April 22 6 hours ago, TH3 said: So Trump farting in the courtroom...😷 Ugh stale, old man, big Mac farts. Makes you wonder if the diaper stories are actually true. 29 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The inmates are truly in charge of the asylum. How can a candidate interfere with an election where they're a candidate of a major political party running an active campaign? I guess if a person is running for president they are above the law in your world. Not sure why anyone would ever take that position. **cue for Bill to insert a cult meme
ChiGoose Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Trump violates his gag orders so frequently and routinely that if it were literally anyone else, they’d almost certainly have been locked up for contempt. If this really was some vast organized conspiracy to stop Trump, he’d already be behind bars.
BillStime Posted April 22 Author Posted April 22 46 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The inmates are truly in charge of the asylum. How can a candidate interfere with an election where they're a candidate of a major political party running an active campaign? 2016 called and want their village idiot back.
ChiGoose Posted April 22 Posted April 22 53 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The inmates are truly in charge of the asylum. How can a candidate interfere with an election where they're a candidate of a major political party running an active campaign? By breaking the law in an attempt to influence the outcome. He should have just paid out of the campaign fund and gotten a slap on the wrist by the FEC (if even that).
Doc Posted April 22 Posted April 22 54 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The inmates are truly in charge of the asylum. How can a candidate interfere with an election where they're a candidate of a major political party running an active campaign? Because people would have been aghast to learn that a guy who cheated on his first 2 wives...cheated on his 3rd wife!
All_Pro_Bills Posted April 23 Posted April 23 14 hours ago, ChiGoose said: By breaking the law in an attempt to influence the outcome. He should have just paid out of the campaign fund and gotten a slap on the wrist by the FEC (if even that). You've got to know any conviction based on this flimsy interpretation and application of an SEC reporting law morphed into an election law violation is going to get overruled on an appeal. The court will rule the law as applied to the circumstances is inappropriate. The prosecutors know this too but the conviction is not the goal. And they're the real culprits here interfering with the 2020 election. By maliciously and intentionally keeping a candidate in court and off the campaign trail in order to support a failing and ineffective President in winning a second term.
ChiGoose Posted April 23 Posted April 23 14 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: You've got to know any conviction based on this flimsy interpretation and application of an SEC reporting law morphed into an election law violation is going to get overruled on an appeal. The court will rule the law as applied to the circumstances is inappropriate. The prosecutors know this too but the conviction is not the goal. And they're the real culprits here interfering with the 2020 election. By maliciously and intentionally keeping a candidate in court and off the campaign trail in order to support a failing and ineffective President in winning a second term. This is just incorrect based on the law and previous cases. Multiple politicians have been found guilty for similar acts under this law. Those convictions were not overturned on appeal. Once again, if the goal was a grand conspiracy by everyone to stop Trump, he’d already be behind bars for violating terms of his bail. 2
BillsFanNC Posted April 23 Posted April 23 ⬆️ The friggin King What did it say? No idea, but I am sure that it's informed by commies 1
Wacka Posted April 23 Posted April 23 (edited) On 4/19/2024 at 11:13 AM, Pokebball said: Ha, your wife would rather you be on this board! I get that It's "wife" has plenty of time to be on this board as it takes only 5 seconds to get the deed done. Who knows if it is male, female, hermaphrodite, or even human (could be a bot). Edited April 23 by Wacka 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted April 23 Posted April 23 36 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: This is just incorrect based on the law and previous cases. Multiple politicians have been found guilty for similar acts under this law. Those convictions were not overturned on appeal. Once again, if the goal was a grand conspiracy by everyone to stop Trump, he’d already be behind bars for violating terms of his bail. Well, if anyone has been convicted of violations of Sarbanes-Oxley applied to election law violations pertaining to NDA's and disclosure requirements including the timing of those disclosures where no campaign funds, either private donations or public funds, were involved I have no problem admitting I'm wrong but would appreciate an example. 1
ChiGoose Posted April 23 Posted April 23 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Well, if anyone has been convicted of violations of Sarbanes-Oxley applied to election law violations pertaining to NDA's and disclosure requirements including the timing of those disclosures where no campaign funds, either private donations or public funds, were involved I have no problem admitting I'm wrong but would appreciate an example. Specific to the Manhattan case (the SOX issue is a different case) multiple people have been charged with felony falsification of business records in connection with an election campaign (what Trump is facing): Clarence Norman was convicted of felony falsification of business records in connection with campaign finance violations. Richard Brega was charged with, and plead guilty to, felony falsification of business records to conceal election law violations Richard Luthmann was charged with, and plead guilty to, felony falsification of business records in furtherance of election law violations. John Dote was charged with, and plead guilty to, felony falsification of business records in connection to election law violations. 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted April 23 Posted April 23 Another huge dud. Another case of using law to try to sway an election..
Recommended Posts