Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/18/2024 at 4:35 PM, Warriorspikes51 said:


Ideally we manage to pull Thomas Jr / Legette / AD Mitchell in the 1st.  Then if we still have pick 60, move up for him 

Expand  

 

Lol...I can pretty much guarantee that we are not taking a WR in the first and then trading up from 60 to get another.  You do realize we just signed Samuel for 3 years right?  

 

Unless this all about your crusade to trade Diggs before the draft...also something not happening.  

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/18/2024 at 6:03 PM, section122 said:

Normally I am all about trading down and accruing more capital.  This year I thought when they got a 4th instead of a 3rd that I would certainly again love the idea.

 

The reality though is it gets a little dangerous.  The first real trade partner that could give a 3rd back would be Wash at 36 and the pick would be #100.  That puts Baltimore, KC, Carolina, and NE/Arizona (depending on who picks MHJ) that could potentially all draft a wr.  Missing out on guys just for pick 100 doesn't seem worth it.  Moving back to 40 with Wash means also getting 78 but giving up a 5th rounder (no big deal) but also adding the Chargers and Tenn who could also grab a wr.  

 

Basically the cupboard could go from full to bare real quick.

 

I think the best option is to hang tight and grab their favorite WR at 28.  Although I think they are eyeing Coleman as he is a Kelvin Benjamin comp and I just have that feeling.  I prefer others but am bracing for it lol.

Expand  

 

I don't think Beane would do a significant trade back and can see him including another one of our Day 3 picks to try and get the 3rd rounder without moving back too far.

 

There are days I feel like Beane is gonna be aggressive and go get someone like Thomas (or Odunze if he falls far enough between a QB run and something insane like Worthy going ahead of him) in the late teens to early 20's...then moments I see him staying put at 28...and then other moments where a small trade back comes into play.  

 

This far out its hard to get a good read on the situation, but all 3 are equally viable options as we sit here today.  

  • Agree 1
Posted

He was sick (as in unhealthy) at the combine which led to his bad performance. At his pro day he was back up 8 pounds, to 186. He has height and speed and if the bills think he’s worth #28 I’m in.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

I've been saying right along that I like Cooper DeJean and if he somehow fell to the Bills I'm ok with taking him at 28.

 

Then Joel Klatt posted his updated mock and has DeJean falling to us and the Bills selecting him at 28... and then closes the round with the Chiefs taking Troy Franklin at 32.

 

I had such an instinctual reaction of disgust from actually hearing it that I think it's changed my mind. Gimme Franklin at 28.

 

I'm also concerned the Chiefs jump us once again and nab the WR we want, so I hope Beane is ready to move.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 3/18/2024 at 3:06 PM, Coach Tuesday said:


I see Justin Jefferson-like skills in those clips.

 


Pickens dropped because of character concerns not separation ability.

Expand  

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/george-pickens/32005049-4357-6156-653f-e3c2b6d1b9bc
 

https://steelersdepot.com/2023/05/scouting-report-the-pros-and-cons-of-wr-george-pickens/

 

There were character concerns too 

Edited by Solomon Grundy
Posted
  On 3/19/2024 at 12:45 AM, DrDawkinstein said:

I've been saying right along that I like Cooper DeJean and if he somehow fell to the Bills I'm ok with taking him at 28.

 

Then Joel Klatt posted his updated mock and has DeJean falling to us and the Bills selecting him at 28... and then closes the round with the Chiefs taking Troy Franklin at 32.

 

I had such an instinctual reaction of disgust from actually hearing it that I think it's changed my mind. Gimme Franklin at 28.

 

I'm also concerned the Chiefs jump us once again and nab the WR we want, so I hope Beane is ready to move.

Expand  

 

There really is no excuse not to take a WR with our 1st pick. I'll be viscerally angry if Beane flubs it. I don't even mind if KC jumps us. There will be multiple 1st round WR talents available at #28.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/18/2024 at 8:59 PM, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Lol...I can pretty much guarantee that we are not taking a WR in the first and then trading up from 60 to get another.  You do realize we just signed Samuel for 3 years right?  

 

Unless this all about your crusade to trade Diggs before the draft...also something not happening.  

 

Expand  

I wish we would. Lock up our #1 and #2 WR’s for the future near entire prime of Josh’s career. Especially when a mid second round WR this draft would likely go much higher in future years.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/19/2024 at 2:25 AM, HappyDays said:

 

There really is no excuse not to take a WR with our 1st pick. I'll be viscerally angry if Beane flubs it. I don't even mind if KC jumps us. There will be multiple 1st round WR talents available at #28.

Expand  

There is one great excuse/reason.  If a player they have rated much higher than the highest rated WR falls to them, it’s a valid excuse, especially if that player is a pass rusher.  There’s a chance that 5,6,7 WRs are off the board when we pick.  If Thomas goes in the teens and Mitchell shortly after, teams could be more apt to trade up ahead of us because everyone knows we’re targeting WR.  
 

If we select Keon Coleman over Latu, I’d have to question whether or not Beane has a clue.  If we took Legette or Franklin over Latu, I wouldn’t be furious but I’d think that they bypassed the better player at another position of need.  
 

The excuse/reason is really only valid if players we had rated very high, fall further than expected.  Lots can depend on how the draft falls. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...