Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Big Turk said:

 

There are no such thing as "unnecessary regulations". Regulations don't just happen just because. They come from companies doing shady things and then trying to sweep it under the rug and not get caught, usually to boost their bottom line profit and CEO bonuses.  Then regulations are created to prevent them from doing that anymore. Then as always, they find a new gray area or loophole to exploit until they are forced to pass another regulation to deal with it. And so on, and so forth.

 

I worked for multiple large global banks. Why do you think there are so many banking regulations? Because as a "cost of doing business" these banks would willfully do shady things and happily pay the fines since they are far less than the profits they made. They literally have people whose sole job is to come up with new ways around regulations and laws to make money.  It's essentially legalized white-collar mafia like activities without any criminal penalties. You think these companies care about some fines? It only hurts when regulations are put in place that can cost them their charters or licenses to do business among many other stiffer penalties.

 

So if you want regulations to be lowered, simply have companies stop willfully and brazenly doing shady, illegal things and getting caught red handed. Good luck with that. The reward is too great and the risk of doing it is far too low to act as a deterrence. Until a regulation is passed. Regulations are REACTIVE, not proactive.

There's always a tug and poll from each party when it  comes to regulations.  There are absolutely unnecessary and/or redundant regulations.  You're correct that to paraphrase we need regulations basically because of human nature.  Banking especially (see subprime mortgage crisis).  Obviously there's been many necessary federal regulations passed (especially during the first half of the 20th century) but you can't study every government regulation and not with a straight face come to the conclusion that regulators have run amok.  There are plenty of regulations that have no usefulness that only make running a business more costly.  Costs that are passed onto the taxpayer and study after study shows they hurt the lowest income people the most.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Big Turk said:

There are no such thing as "unnecessary regulations".

On a message board overflowing with absurdities, this is right at the top of the list.

 

Imagine how wonderful everything would be if we only had more government regulations! 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

On a message board overflowing with absurdities, this is right at the top of the list.

 

Imagine how wonderful everything would be if we only had more government regulations! 


I know! I love that they’re cutting food inspections! Can’t wait to roll the dice on if my milk will give me explosive diarrhea or not 

Posted
3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

On a message board overflowing with absurdities, this is right at the top of the list.

 

Imagine how wonderful everything would be if we only had more government regulations! 

 

Read the whole post.  You may actually learn something.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Read the whole post.  You may actually learn something.


He won’t. He hides from posts like yours until he feels he can get some stupid quip in that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


I know! I love that they’re cutting food inspections! Can’t wait to roll the dice on if my milk will give me explosive diarrhea or not 

Just imagine you get your way and everyone gets herded to one of your stacked  storage container cities.  The milk issue comes up, every resident Viva L’Revolution Square Village above you, below you, to either side gets the explosive d because everyone buys at the same govt co-op you’re all forced to use because you have no cars.  
 

It’ll be raining hot fudge! 
 

Reason # 418 to be cautious of communes and liberal future city planners. 
 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Just imagine you get your way and everyone gets herded to one of your stacked  storage container cities.  The milk issue comes up, every resident Viva L’Revolution Square Village above you, below you, to either side gets the explosive d because everyone buys at the same govt co-op you’re all forced to use because you have no cars.  
 

It’ll be raining hot fudge! 
 

Reason # 418 to be cautious of communes and liberal future city planners. 
 

 


Can you show me exactly where I’ve advocated for “communes” and “stacked storage container cities?” Don’t remember Jane Jacobs writing about that. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


He won’t. He hides from posts like yours until he feels he can get some stupid quip in that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. 

I responded to “there is no such thing as unnecessary regulations”. Ridiculous in the extreme. 

×
×
  • Create New...