The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Author Posted March 19 Just now, Tommy Callahan said: Kidding. They are probably getting stimulus money and doing it to get around the current 25% tariffs on china vehicles OF COURSE they'd be doing it to get around the current tariffs. They aren't stupid. The rebates on EVs are now ridiculously complicated under the IRA rules, so we'd have to see how any Chinese company Mexican production facility would fit within them. But the point is they'd be manufactured not in China, but in MEXICO. And to qualify under post-NAFTA USCANMEX rules, they'd have to comply with minimum requirements (as they relate to work conditions) set forth in that treaty. TRUMP negotiated that treaty. If it was a bad treaty, if it allowed for foreign direct investment by China in Mexico to benefit under its terms, then that's on him. People really have a problem with comprehension.
Tommy Callahan Posted March 19 Posted March 19 3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: OF COURSE they'd be doing it to get around the current tariffs. They aren't stupid. The rebates on EVs are now ridiculously complicated under the IRA rules, so we'd have to see how any Chinese company Mexican production facility would fit within them. But the point is they'd be manufactured not in China, but in MEXICO. And to qualify under post-NAFTA USCANMEX rules, they'd have to comply with minimum requirements (as they relate to work conditions) set forth in that treaty. TRUMP negotiated that treaty. If it was a bad treaty, if it allowed for foreign direct investment by China in Mexico to benefit under its terms, then that's on him. People really have a problem with comprehension. And when the current rate is raised to 100 to keep it competitive. Or could help with the insane deficit. Who knows.
sherpa Posted March 19 Posted March 19 18 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are an idiot. Clown boy I do OK, but thanks. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Author Posted March 19 1 hour ago, sherpa said: I do OK, but thanks. Sherpa, Tiberius: I think both of you make some good contributions to this board. Let's maybe try to keep the insults limited to our pre-existing insult comics? 1
daz28 Posted March 19 Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: The current thing is working so well in so many ways. The graph literally is comparing one stock to another, and claiming it's an indicator of doom. Then at the end it says, "The top 10% of stocks in the US now reflect ~75% of the entire market.", which would mean that there's actually very little speculation happening. Seems contradictory to me, and definitely not the same thing as the dot-com bubble. 1
sherpa Posted March 19 Posted March 19 20 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Sherpa, Tiberius: I think both of you make some good contributions to this board. Let's maybe try to keep the insults limited to our pre-existing insult comics? I insulted no one. I am simply not going to respond to him, absent some compelling reason. It is that simple, and I'd be pleased to be banned if that is untenable. 1
LeviF Posted May 14 Posted May 14 Good when either side does it. His first point obliterates any credibility he might have to push the others. Any clue as to why China can produce low priced EVs? 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 14 Posted May 14 (edited) On 3/19/2024 at 4:32 PM, sherpa said: I insulted no one. I am simply not going to respond to him, absent some compelling reason. It is that simple, and I'd be pleased to be banned if that is untenable. @sherpa after he is banned: Edited May 14 by leh-nerd skin-erd
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 14 Posted May 14 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Bad when either side does it. The challenge with drawing a line in the sand over what one side does that the other does not, is that if you wait a hot sec, the other side will do what you complained about originally. That assumes, of course, that they weren't doing it to begin with, while complaining about it. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/democrats-in-debate-criticize-trump-over-china-tariffs-and-trade-war.html
The Frankish Reich Posted May 14 Author Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: The challenge with drawing a line in the sand over what one side does that the other does not, is that if you wait a hot sec, the other side will do what you complained about originally. That assumes, of course, that they weren't doing it to begin with, while complaining about it. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/democrats-in-debate-criticize-trump-over-china-tariffs-and-trade-war.html Elections. You know, the time when all principles and any understanding of economics go out the window in search of some extra votes in Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania.
B-Man Posted September 25 Posted September 25 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Tweet removed Hahahahahahahahaha. . Edited September 25 by B-Man
B-Man Posted September 25 Posted September 25 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: OMG. They just keep getting more and more hysterical. I am worried that they won't make it another 6 weeks.
Roundybout Posted September 26 Posted September 26 15 hours ago, B-Man said: OMG. They just keep getting more and more hysterical. I am worried that they won't make it another 6 weeks. Why do you support policies that actively hurt consumers?
Recommended Posts