BillsFanNC Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 Dem politicians (yes even Presidential candidates), talking heads and celebrities NEVER talk about inciting violence against their political opponents. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Unless you have "examined" it from a pure textual perspective. ...no, still dead. 31 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Nothing new. I hope Trump supporters try another Jan 6 when he loses and I hope the Capitol Police takes the gloves off this time. These people are cockroaches in need of a big old boot. It will be another Summer of 2020. And hopefully the LE gloves come off. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 it is PRECISELY crap like this that makes me Hate politics. I think he meant the auto industry would experience bloodbath. BUT The choice of word was an inflammatory choice. Does he talk out both sides of his mouth though? CONSTANTLY In view of all that is going on in his life do you think he ever filters or thinks of what he says before he blurts out his mouth. I bet his lawyers wish he would STFU at times. He can be his own worst enemy. AS IF more fire needed be put on political rhetoric in view of his legal troubles and the 1/6 issues. the optics are HORRIBLE. Lord have mercy. Now flame away I do GAF but it's PPP It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, muppy said: it is PRECISELY crap like this that makes me Hate politics. I think he meant the auto industry would experience bloodbath. BUT The choice of word was an inflammatory choice. Does he talk out both sides of his mouth though? CONSTANTLY In view of all that is going on in his life do you think he ever filters or thinks of what he says before he blurts out his mouth. I bet his lawyers wish he would STFU at times. He can be his own worst enemy. AS IF more fire needed be put on political rhetoric in view of his legal troubles and the 1/6 issues. the optics are HORRIBLE. Lord have mercy. Now flame away I do GAF but it's PPP It is what it is. The optics for the Dems, trying to take Trump's words out of context, were HORRIBLE. And that's the reason why non-Trump fans like Steven A. Smith called them out for it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 Can't have it both ways. The optics must then be horrible here too. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 lol again I will repeat myself it is PRECISELY crap like this that make me abhor politics. I expected nothing less here of all places. it is so much war fare. I hate politics and I hate fighting. Im OUT 🖤 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Plausible deniability: it’s your MO as well. Try transparency sometime. It would be uncomfortable at first but ultimately redeeming Transparency: I used to feel that exchanging thoughts with you was a worthwhile endeavor. As with all posters, I assume they are who they say they are with respect to occupation, education, background or whatever they choose to share. It just makes things easier. Over the past couple months, I've noticed that you seem to have trouble keeping track of things you've posted a just day(s) or weeks earlier. I've withheld commentary on that because it seems unsporting, and beyond that, what's the harm? However, this, coupled with your prolific penchant for puffery has caused me to reconsider the value of what you offer. Thank you again. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, muppy said: I bet his lawyers wish he would STFU at times. He can be his own worst enemy. Right. Think about this one: "I will be a dictator on day one." Wonderful. We can talk about what he means (is he literally going to circumvent the constitution, or was this just another example of Trump trolling the libs?) But let's say he gets elected and on Day One he issues an Executive Order similar to (but more expansive than) he ill-fated "Muslim Ban." The lawsuits come the next day. And what do the lawsuits cite? TRUMP's OWN WORDS in which he admitted he'd be a "dictator" (read: a violator of constitutional separation of powers) on Day One. Is he doing this because he expects - maybe even wants? - courts to stop his own stupidity? Is he doing it because all he cares about is getting elected and he thinks this sounds appealing to his base? Because the conclusion is now obvious: any EO he issues on Day One is presumptively unconstitutional. Because he said as much. Hell, I'll work on that lawsuit; it'll be like shooting fish in a barrel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 7 minutes ago, muppy said: it is PRECISELY crap like this that makes me Hate politics. I think he meant the auto industry would experience bloodbath. BUT The choice of word was an inflammatory choice. Does he talk out both sides of his mouth though? CONSTANTLY In view of all that is going on in his life do you think he ever filters or thinks of what he says before he blurts out his mouth. I bet his lawyers wish he would STFU at times. He can be his own worst enemy. AS IF more fire needed be put on political rhetoric in view of his legal troubles and the 1/6 issues. the optics are HORRIBLE. Lord have mercy. Now flame away I do GAF but it's PPP It is what it is. Hello Muppy, This isn't about posters on PPP threads taking shots at each other. It's feigned outrage over specific moments in time designed to rile up listeners/readers/voters to manipulate them accordingly. It works. 15 seconds and a google search will reveal all sports of people, from all walks of life, using words that can get someone, somewhere, worked up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Hello Muppy, This isn't about posters on PPP threads taking shots at each other. It's feigned outrage over specific moments in time designed to rile up listeners/readers/voters to manipulate them accordingly. It works. 15 seconds and a google search will reveal all sports of people, from all walks of life, using words that can get someone, somewhere, worked up. And with Trump they parse every word to get the maximum outrage they can for their followers. And because of TDS, it works like a charm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 24 minutes ago, Doc said: ...no, still dead. It will be another Summer of 2020. And hopefully the LE gloves come off. That mask is a-slipping, Doc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Hello Muppy, This isn't about posters on PPP threads taking shots at each other. It's feigned outrage over specific moments in time designed to rile up listeners/readers/voters to manipulate them accordingly. It works. 15 seconds and a google search will reveal all sports of people, from all walks of life, using words that can get someone, somewhere, worked up. So let's go to a different one: what does "I will be a dictator on Day One" mean? Because it's pretty obvious to me that it means "I won't be constrained by the constitution when I issue Executive Orders." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 17 minutes ago, muppy said: lol again I will repeat myself it is PRECISELY crap like this that make me abhor politics. I expected nothing less here of all places. it is so much war fare. I hate politics and I hate fighting. Im OUT 🖤 I see what you're saying. But you have all those examples of democrats using "bloodbath" and then this recent example of Trump using it, and I'm sure he's used it many, many times in the past in both business and political contexts. But there was never an uproar in the media about anyone using this term, until a few days ago when they purposely and in unison took the words out of context. All politicians talk out of both sides of their mouth. It's a job requirement. Show me a politician who doesn't mislead and I'll show you one who isn't getting re-elected. It's hard enough nailing them down on the truth. So it would be nice not to have a media that lies consistently about what politicians actually say (certain ones more than others). Most people are smart enough to read and understand what they said when given the whole story. What should piss everyone off here is the media in unison purposely trying to mislead the public. Again. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: So let's go to a different one: what does "I will be a dictator on Day One" mean? Because it's pretty obvious to me that it means "I won't be constrained by the constitution when I issue Executive Orders." Sure. Send over links or video that you're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Roundybout said: That mask is a-slipping, Doc. Why? There were plenty of white guilt libs participating in the Summer of 2020. But regardless of who participated, the destruction was 100X worse than J6 and should not be tolerated again. Edited March 19 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 6 minutes ago, Doc said: the destruction was 100X worse than J6 Yes, it was. Since when do we equate the amount of destruction with the target of the destruction? 17 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Sure. Send over links or video that you're talking about. Oh, because you've never seen that interview. Never mind. Here you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Yes, it was. Since when do we equate the amount of destruction with the target of the destruction? "We" don't and didn't. Again regardless of who participated in it, it shouldn't be allowed to happen again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Doc said: "We" don't and didn't. Again regardless of who participated in it, it shouldn't be allowed to happen again. No argument there. You can search every post of mine on PPP and never find one that could be construed as soft on crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: No argument there. You can search every post of mine on PPP and never find one that could be construed as soft on crime. What about soft in the head? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, wnyguy said: What about soft in the head? Well that's a whole different story, isn't it ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts