Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 7:40 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

I think his roster bonus should have triggered at the start of the league year in which case he will cost the Eagles about $900k this year.

Expand  

I just read his base is $1.9M. 

As others have pointed out a "quality" backup QB probably is the same cost.

 

As another posted pointed out, if Beane had done this and wasted 22 draft spots the board would rightly explode. Eagles got fleeced. 

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 9:07 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said:

I just read his base is $1.9M. 

As others have pointed out a "quality" backup QB probably is the same cost.

 

As another posted pointed out, if Beane had done this and wasted 22 draft spots the board would rightly explode. Eagles got fleeced. 

Expand  

 

That depends if the roster bonus travels. I am not sure it does but I am not certain. Even so, I see the sense. Not saying I agree with it. But I do think there is a certain logic there. Teams who are in a window don't want a backup who has never played in the league.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 7:20 PM, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

Maybe they just think he is worth that much as a backup QB…. Which he is not. 

Expand  


I disagree. I think he is. 

In fact I think he instantly becomes a top 5 backup in the NFL, which is very valuable.  

Howie Roseman is one of the greatest GM's in the history of the NFL and I think this is another very solid move by him.


I think Howie is also counting on drafting very low, which makes this closer to a 4th round pick.

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 7:16 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Don't understand this move from Eagles perspective? 

Only way it pays off is if Hurts misses seom time and Pickett looks good and then you trade him.

All they did was lose draft position and gain nothing. 

What am I missing?

Expand  

 

Pittsburgh is afraid of bruising Wilson's ego.

  • Agree 2
Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 9:22 PM, Einstein said:


I disagree. I think he is. 

In fact I think he instantly becomes a top 5 backup in the NFL, which is very valuable.  

Howie Roseman is one of the greatest GM's in the history of the NFL and I think this is another very solid move by him.


I think Howie is also counting on drafting very low, which makes this closer to a 4th round pick.

Expand  


it is a lot to invest in a guy who isn’t going to play. The drop off between having a top-5 backup and a top-20 one isn’t that much either. For example, the rams just signed Jimmy G to a 1-year deal.  Seems like that is the better move. 

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 9:56 PM, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


it is a lot to invest in a guy who isn’t going to play. The drop off between having a top-5 backup and a top-20 one isn’t that much either. For example, the rams just signed Jimmy G to a 1-year deal.  Seems like that is the better move. 

Expand  


I can understand your viewpoint, but I disagree that there is not a big drop-off from a top 5 backup to a top 20 backup.

For example:

- The Steelers were 7-3 when Pickett started and finished the game last season. He had wins over playoff teams such as Baltimore, Cleveland and the Rams. He threw for over 200 yards in 60% of his games.


- They were 0-3 with Trubisky starting. All of those losses came against non-playoff teams. He threw for over 200 yards in 0% of his games.

One is our backup QB. The other is Philly's. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I’m not here to toot my horn because I have been wrong plenty of times, but I felt as convicted as I did about tim Tebow that he wasn’t a franchise qb when he came out.

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 7:16 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Don't understand this move from Eagles perspective? 

Only way it pays off is if Hurts misses seom time and Pickett looks good and then you trade him.

All they did was lose draft position and gain nothing. 

What am I missing?

Expand  

 

It's Roseman, so he must know something.

Posted
  On 3/15/2024 at 7:23 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said:

They dropped 22 spots and now have a backup on a 1st round pick salary. 

Waste 

Expand  


It a 2 year deal that’s $1m cheaper than trubisky 

 

I won’t say it’s huge value but they get a guy they are comfortable with for a decent contract with modest draft capital

  On 3/15/2024 at 9:56 PM, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


it is a lot to invest in a guy who isn’t going to play. The drop off between having a top-5 backup and a top-20 one isn’t that much either. For example, the rams just signed Jimmy G to a 1-year deal.  Seems like that is the better move. 

Expand  


would think the cash value would effect that determination 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...