GunnerBill Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Trade a 2nd and a 6th plus a 2025 2nd for Houston's 1st and 7th. That is to give them ammunition to get up again for a QB surely? 2 6 1 Quote
Don Otreply Posted March 15 Posted March 15 I suspect you are correct, it is entertaining to watch teams jockey for position throughout free agency and the draft, 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 15 Posted March 15 A few weeks back I thought we could trade Diggs to HOU for 23. Clearly, their pick was available. I’d have gladly given up 60, a 4th and 2nd next year for that pick. Great move Vikings 1 1 1 Quote
WotAGuy Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Ammo to pick up Peterman from the Saints. It’ll be costly. 12 Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Pretty much the same ammunition the Bills had when they went up to 7 to get JA. I'm sure Vikes are doing the same 3 Quote
papazoid Posted March 15 Posted March 15 two early second round picks are better than one late first when you factor in talent vs salary cap 1 Quote
Process Posted March 15 Posted March 15 That seems like bad value for Houston, no? What do the charts say? Go from 23 to 42 for basically just a second round pick next year 1 10 Quote
JoeF Posted March 15 Posted March 15 12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Trade a 2nd and a 6th plus a 2025 2nd for Houston's 1st and 7th. That is to give them ammunition to get up again for a QB surely? 2 2 Quote
Gregg Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Ian Rapoport on X: "A Draft Trade!! The #Vikings and #Texans have agreed to terms on a major deal in advance of the draft, per me and @TomPelissero, landing Minnesota another 1. — Minnesota gets No. 23 and No. 232. — Houston gets No. 42, 188 and a 2025 2nd rounder. MIN moves up, HOU collects. https://t.co/ehRFqOKbFz" / X (twitter.com) Quote
MAJBobby Posted March 15 Posted March 15 They start their move to a QB. In Context March 12th 2018 Buffalo Bills Trade 21 and Cordy Glen to Cincy for No 12. That 12 combined with a couple 2ns turned into 7, which well turned into the Alien. 3 1 Quote
No_Matter_What Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Just now, MAJBobby said: They start their move to a QB. In Context March 12th 2018 Buffalo Bills Trade 21 and Cordy Glen to Cincy for No 12. That 12 combined with a couple 2ns turned into 7, which well turned into the Alien. I wanted to post this as soon as I saw the title. Brandon Beane QB drafting school. Quote
gonzo1105 Posted March 15 Posted March 15 (edited) Is NE really gonna go with Bailey Zappe? Or Brissett?would have thought they would take a guy but they are the most likely out of the top 3. Getting ahead of the Giants at 6 maybe. You wouldn’t make this move unless you already had a trade partner or an idea of one and this can’t possibly be for JJ McCarthy but crazier ***** had happened in the draft when it comes to selecting QBs Edited March 15 by gonzo1105 1 Quote
Allen2Moulds Posted March 15 Posted March 15 16 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Trade a 2nd and a 6th plus a 2025 2nd for Houston's 1st and 7th. That is to give them ammunition to get up again for a QB surely? Definitely screams QB, but seems like at least one more move is needed, to assure they have a shot at one of the top guys. The question to me is, are any of the teams at the top, willing to pass on a QB and move down? 1 Quote
Seventeen Posted March 15 Posted March 15 3 minutes ago, Allen2Moulds said: Definitely screams QB, but seems like at least one more move is needed, to assure they have a shot at one of the top guys. The question to me is, are any of the teams at the top, willing to pass on a QB and move down? I'm shocked - Sam Darnold is not going to reincarnate himself as Baker Mayfield and lead the Vikings to glory ? 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Guessing the Vikings are looking to extend a particular WR who might be concerned about QB play there. This might be creating some urgency for Kwesi and the Vikes. Quote
BBFL Posted March 15 Posted March 15 I mean what do they do? It’s likely QB’s first 3 picks, right? Williams, Maye, Daniels…? Washington isn’t trading out of the top 3 and after the Mac Jones trade, can’t see them doing it either. So do they trade to the #1 spot? 11, 23, 2025 first? Or do they need to give up more? Maybe they just stand pat and see if any of them fall past those teams then jump into 4 or 5 with AZ or NYG. Imagine AZ trade out… Man they would be absolutely stacked in this draft. 11, 23, 27, 35, 66, 71 & 90…. Quote
Gregg Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Just now, BBFL said: I mean what do they do? It’s likely QB’s first 3 picks, right? Williams, Maye, Daniels…? Washington isn’t trading out of the top 3 and after the Mac Jones trade, can’t see them doing it either. So do they trade to the #1 spot? 11, 23, 2025 first? Or do they need to give up more? Maybe they just stand pat and see if any of them fall past those teams then jump into 4 or 5 with AZ or NYG. Imagine AZ trade out… Man they would be absolutely stacked in this draft. 11, 23, 27, 35, 66, 71 & 90…. QB's probably are the first 3 picks but I wouldn't be surprised if MHJ goes in the top 3 either. 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted March 15 Posted March 15 1 minute ago, BBFL said: I mean what do they do? It’s likely QB’s first 3 picks, right? Williams, Maye, Daniels…? Washington isn’t trading out of the top 3 and after the Mac Jones trade, can’t see them doing it either. So do they trade to the #1 spot? 11, 23, 2025 first? Or do they need to give up more? Maybe they just stand pat and see if any of them fall past those teams then jump into 4 or 5 with AZ or NYG. Imagine AZ trade out… Man they would be absolutely stacked in this draft. 11, 23, 27, 35, 66, 71 & 90…. I think NE is passing on a QB which is dumb but maybe it’s to get McCarthy ahead of the Giants but either way it’s a dumb decision one way or the other Quote
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 15 Posted March 15 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Process said: That seems like bad value for Houston, no? What do the charts say? Go from 23 to 42 for basically just a second round pick next year I come up with Texans giving up 780 and gets back about 680 points assuming using the "rule" that you downgrade a pick in following year by one round level and I assumed Viking finish next year around middle of draft. If you don't downgrade a round, then Vikes gave up almost 900 points, so putting it in the middle of those two scenarios says it's about even?? So adding to that, they could now trade their 11th and 23rd to move up to #4. Looks like they don't have a 3rd rounder so can't get much higher unless they make another trade to get a pick(s) Edited March 15 by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.