NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 15 Posted March 15 23 minutes ago, NastyNateSoldiers said: Well from the reports it was Whaley who wanted Mahomes and Pegs but Mcd didn't and he was the one traded him so there goes that. I thought we were talking about Beane as GM specifically—and he got our franchise QB in place (plus worked out a great looking extension) 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted March 15 Posted March 15 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Trust The Process said: My complaint with Beane is bad asset management and for not being skilled at reading the draft board in a WR rich draft. I can replace Davis with a rookie in the first 2 rounds of the draft for a lot less money than what we have Samuel who plays 58% of the snaps. The rookie I draft can be Diggs future replacement with a snap count similar to Diggs. Beane just need to do his job and hit on the receiver he drafts. It’s a calculated risk. I can replace Sherfield with a day 3 rookie WR who’s a lot cheaper with much more upside than Hollins. Looks like Beane prefers to move in a different direction … It’s nothing new right .. this regime always preferred experience over rookies … I will wait and see how things pan out in six months , rather then worrying about it now… lot of people this time last year were demanding they pay money for a LB Edited March 15 by Aussie Joe 1 Quote
Trust The Process Posted March 15 Posted March 15 (edited) Who helps Allen and our offense most? Sign Derrick Henry for the money we spent on Samuel, and draft a X WR within the first 2 rounds? OR… Sign Samuel and draft a X WR? Sign Samuel and draft a RB? Edited March 15 by Trust The Process 1 1 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted March 15 Posted March 15 16 minutes ago, Trust The Process said: Huge safety free agency class and we get nothing. Deep WR draft and we sign Hollins and Samuel. We trade Bates but we release Morse And we sign Morrow and depth guys instead of addressing starters. Once again, Beane is doing the opposite of which makes sense. He did the same thing the year we traded for Diggs. The depth at WR was strong in that draft and what Beane chose to do is trade for Diggs instead of drafting Jefferson. We shouldn’t have had to waste additional draft picks and a ton of valuable cap space on Diggs. You really don't like Beane so I won't address that directly. Everyone has an opinion. Just a couple of questions. 1. Do you want Diggs to finish his contract in Buffalo? If yes, signing Samuel's wouldn't be a good thing. He could get Gabe's replacement in the draft. If no, signing Samuel is not a bad idea and drafting a top WR makes sense. We will see the answer to what Beane thinks in the draft. 2. The only reason Morse was let go is money. His replacement is a question. However, having Bates as "heir apparent" is not so cut and dry with me as with others (I guess you too). Bates in his entire career in Buffalo has had 3 full games (around 200) snaps at the Center position. Moving on from him has to be more about his perceived ability to be a starting Center for a playoff team, than just saving money. That's how I see it. 3. Signing Morrow is what it is. They needed 1 more depth guy. Beane has limited funds and having one of his underlings get this deal done early has no bearing on Beane's ability to look at more "starter type" guys. You may think he can't, but I do believe OBD can walk and chew gum at the same time. Signing Morrow now or in a week makes no difference to me. 4. Diggs vs Jefferson. Come on, Josh was young and never had a great WR to throw the ball to. Diggs had proven talent and no doubt was helpful to Josh in his progress. This is truly hindsight at it's best. I know I won't budge you from what you think and believe. Just giving you a perspective from the other side of the coin. 2 2 Quote
FireChans Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said: I guess since Sherfield sucked, I guess that means Stefon Diggs sucked, Jordan Poyer sucked, Micah Hyde sucked, Mitch Morse sucked, Cole Beasley sucked.... Hey we haven't won the Super Bowl yet....everybody sucks that Beane brought on! Nope. Just Sherfield sucks. That was a terrible retort. Quote
Trust The Process Posted March 15 Posted March 15 12 minutes ago, stinky finger said: You presume to know how CS will be utilized. You shouldn’t. I didn’t presume. I did my homework on Samuels with analytics, scouting reports, and how he was used in Washington and with Joe Brady in Carolina. I expect to see mostly the same in Buffalo with slightly better stats. Samuel’s career yards per reception is not impressive, and isn’t a big play threat despite running the 40 yard dash in 4.31 seconds which means he doesn’t play fast. 1 1 Quote
longtimebillsfan Posted March 15 Posted March 15 2 hours ago, FireChans said: Maybe if our receivers were better than Mahomes’, we would’ve been to a Super Bowl. Unfortunately, we got stuck with Trent Sherfield and his alligator arm efforts led us to need a FG to tie in the closing minutes. Which was predictably shanked. No one is saying Beane sucks or the Bills suck. Their WR management and group has been overall insufficient. Who could argue this? No one. I know you can’t even debate it because you hilariously aren’t even trying to. You just say things like, “we won the AFCE” like that has anything to do with the conversation. If you want to tell me that the investments into the WR group over the last 3 seasons have been good, I’d love to hear why. Otherwise, you just want to wave poms poms and you should just quit while you’re behind. I respect your dedication to your narrative. 1 Quote
BADOLBILZ Posted March 15 Posted March 15 (edited) 32 minutes ago, FireChans said: That was a terrible retort. Yeah I am guessing @Royale with Cheese is trying out a new technique. Like when Dice put out "The Day The Laughter Died" and refused to tell the nursery rhymes to the crowd. An artist has to explore. Personally, I am going to dabble back into "sub-illumination" the rest of the offseason. Which is understating an overwhelming strength in your argument to disorient your adversary. They badly want to tell you that you are wrong but to do so they have to actually address a fact that damns their side of the argument to do it. Like "what do you mean, Allen had 38 total TD's last year, he was awesome" Edited March 15 by BADOLBILZ Quote
Royale with Cheese Posted March 15 Posted March 15 1 hour ago, NastyNateSoldiers said: 2017 Off-season was huge Tre, Dawkins, Milano , Poyer and Hyde . U got some work to do bud DaQuan is overrated never helped when it matters where's he been the last 2 playoff yrs? Against Cinny injured and playing injured vs KC so what did he do exactly? Diggs and I said this at the time horrible move in a loaded Wr class that pk turned out to be the best Wr in NFL . The guys u mentioned are good players but there not on the level of Tre, Milano, Dawkins and the best safety duo we probably ever had. Hmmmm… Because Tre White, Milano, Poyer and Hyde were not also apart of our underwhelming playoff defenses? Did they all step up when it matters? Quote
stinky finger Posted March 15 Posted March 15 38 minutes ago, Trust The Process said: I didn’t presume. I did my homework on Samuels with analytics, scouting reports, and how he was used in Washington and with Joe Brady in Carolina. I expect to see mostly the same in Buffalo with slightly better stats. Samuel’s career yards per reception is not impressive, and isn’t a big play threat despite running the 40 yard dash in 4.31 seconds which means he doesn’t play fast. Sounds rather......presumptive. 2 Quote
FireChans Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 27 minutes ago, longtimebillsfan said: I respect your dedication to your narrative. That Trent Sherfield sucks and he’s not an ideal player to start against our biggest playoff rival that has a 3 time champion HoF QB/Coach combo? It’s not that hard of a narrative to push. It’s pretty factual. Quote
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 15 Posted March 15 2017 Draft Profile: Overview Jack-of-all trades but master of none, Samuel showed an ability to gain yardage and create scoring opportunities in a variety of ways on a talented Buckeyes offense. However, NFL teams will want to slot him into a more defined role, which is most likely at receiver. He is still learning the position and has separation quickness to create open throwing lanes, but while he's sharpening his route work, he could find early reps as a kick returner. Strengths - Has crisp feet for sudden change of direction - Long-strider with deep speed to challenge press coverage over the top Shows defender an exaggerated jab fake at top of his routes to generate lean from cornerback and create separation out of his break - On comeback routes, can stutter feet into his break for a sudden stop-and-open timing throws - Has explosiveness both vertically and out of his breaks to uncover on all three levels - Can ramp it back up to top gear quickly after tapping his brakes in space At his best when matched up in open space - Gets faster and more dangerous as the play unfolds - Has two years of kick-return experience - Moveable matchup piece Weaknesses - Plays with some hip tightness that make his play more linear than fluid - Needs to work on release against press - Could get hung up off the line and into his routes by athletic, press-cover slot men - Has unnatural hands that fight the throw - Will default to body catches - Didn't have as many "pro-style" touches as teams would like - Averaged just 5.5 yards at the catch point, and several carries came on jet sweeps and stretch plays from shotgun - Average ball-tracking and adjustments to poor throws - Wasn't asked to handle blocking responsibilities very often 2 Quote
NastyNateSoldiers Posted March 15 Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said: Hmmmm… Because Tre White, Milano, Poyer and Hyde were not also apart of our underwhelming playoff defenses? Did they all step up when it matters? I was correcting the poster saying Beane brought Hyde, Poyer etc etc . Then it turned into debate . Quote
GunnerBill Posted March 15 Posted March 15 1 hour ago, JohnBonhamRocks said: 2017 Draft Profile: Overview Jack-of-all trades but master of none, Samuel showed an ability to gain yardage and create scoring opportunities in a variety of ways on a talented Buckeyes offense. However, NFL teams will want to slot him into a more defined role, which is most likely at receiver. He is still learning the position and has separation quickness to create open throwing lanes, but while he's sharpening his route work, he could find early reps as a kick returner. Strengths - Has crisp feet for sudden change of direction - Long-strider with deep speed to challenge press coverage over the top Shows defender an exaggerated jab fake at top of his routes to generate lean from cornerback and create separation out of his break - On comeback routes, can stutter feet into his break for a sudden stop-and-open timing throws - Has explosiveness both vertically and out of his breaks to uncover on all three levels - Can ramp it back up to top gear quickly after tapping his brakes in space At his best when matched up in open space - Gets faster and more dangerous as the play unfolds - Has two years of kick-return experience - Moveable matchup piece Weaknesses - Plays with some hip tightness that make his play more linear than fluid - Needs to work on release against press - Could get hung up off the line and into his routes by athletic, press-cover slot men - Has unnatural hands that fight the throw - Will default to body catches - Didn't have as many "pro-style" touches as teams would like - Averaged just 5.5 yards at the catch point, and several carries came on jet sweeps and stretch plays from shotgun - Average ball-tracking and adjustments to poor throws - Wasn't asked to handle blocking responsibilities very often And to be honest.... he has been that guy in the pros. Jack of all trades is exactly the description. I like the signing, do not get my wrong, he is legit - he can play. But he isn't alone a difference maker. Quote
Solomon Grundy Posted March 16 Posted March 16 12 hours ago, Lost said: He had the slowest 40 time of every receiver at the combine. That's concerning. There's a plethora of GREAT WRs that ran slow 40s. Rice, Boldin are 2 that comes to mind 13 hours ago, NewEra said: And shows very little ability to separate. That’s my issue with him. I feel that he’ll be Gabe 2.0 whereas Josh will force him the ball to give the guy a chance to make a play and interceptions will result. They said the same about Metcalf, DHop, Michael Thomas about not separating from coverage. Catching the ball is job #1 1 Quote
BBFL Posted March 16 Posted March 16 5 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said: There's a plethora of GREAT WRs that ran slow 40s. Rice, Boldin are 2 that comes to mind They said the same about Metcalf, DHop, Michael Thomas about not separating from coverage. Catching the ball is job #1 Boldin might honestly be one of my favorite receivers from the past 20 years. Tough, consummate professional. Takes some cojones to get your face absolutely shattered and only miss 3 games. Insane. Quote
NoName Posted March 16 Posted March 16 On 3/14/2024 at 5:56 PM, Behindenemylines said: But can he drop balls like Gabe, that’s what I want to know Just adds to the in-game excitement! Pause!!! Quote
Mat68 Posted March 16 Posted March 16 47 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said: There's a plethora of GREAT WRs that ran slow 40s. Rice, Boldin are 2 that comes to mind They said the same about Metcalf, DHop, Michael Thomas about not separating from coverage. Catching the ball is job #1 Metcalf had a megatron type RAS. He is not the same. For every Thomas, Rice and Boldin there are 100 Brandon Lafell, USC Mike Williams, Treadwell, Blackmon busts. Besides Rice, who came out in the 80’s, that is why the other guys went rd 2. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.