Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What "tricks" has he pulled from his bag so far?   Seems as if he's merely cleaning up after himself so far.  

 

Seems to me that the single biggest need without much controversy is at WR.  

 

At present we have only one WR on the team that has put up 700+ yards at any point in his entire career.  That's Diggs.   Hollins and Shakir both put up over 600, once each.  No WR on the team besides Diggs has ever logged more than 3 TDs in a season or even 400 yards otherwise.  

 

Many believe that Diggs' skills have diminished.  If that's true and we don't do something serious, how can we expect this season to amount to much.  

 

Seems logical that no matter what, our first pick at 28th overall absolutely must be a WR.  Possibly even our 60th.  A WR in the late 4th isn't a good thing to bank on.  

 

Sure, Shorter or another could step up.  We could also have a cadre of mediocre WRs.  We have Kincaid, maybe that's the offset.  

 

The situation seems dicey at best at this point.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

Most of his significant moves have been releasing guys, no?

That’s half of it. He’s culled the herd. Time to identify young talent for the next iteration.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

What "tricks" has he pulled from his bag so far?   Seems as if he's merely cleaning up after himself so far.  

 

Seems to me that the single biggest need without much controversy is at WR.  

 

At present we have only one WR on the team that has put up 700+ yards at any point in his entire career.  That's Diggs.   Hollins and Shakir both put up over 600, once each.  No WR on the team besides Diggs has ever logged more than 3 TDs in a season or even 400 yards otherwise.  

 

Many believe that Diggs' skills have diminished.  If that's true and we don't do something serious, how can we expect this season to amount to much.  

 

Seems logical that no matter what, our first pick at 28th overall absolutely must be a WR.  Possibly even our 60th.  A WR in the late 4th isn't a good thing to bank on.  

 

Sure, Shorter or another could step up.  We could also have a cadre of mediocre WRs.  We have Kincaid, maybe that's the offset.  

 

The situation seems dicey at best at this point.  

 

 

Shakir gonna get his shot this year. He’s earned that. The draft will have to bear fruit. I think Beane realizes what’s needed and will aggressively attack the draft. 

Posted
Just now, stinky finger said:

Shakir gonna get his shot this year. He’s earned that. The draft will have to bear fruit. I think Beane realizes what’s needed and will aggressively attack the draft. 

 

Of course, but it has nothing to do with who's earned what, it has to do with talent.  

 

Shakir's a slot WR.  Right now we have no one capable opposite Diggs.  I blame the play-calling and Diggs' use, but if it did happen to be true that his speed/abilities have diminished, Shakir in the slot ain't gonna come close to cuttin' it.  

 

The crying here over Davis' play, LOL, that's going to seem like a bonanza unless we get another WR in here.  We need to be consistent with our analyses and discussions.  IF Davis didn't cut it, and on top of that if Diggs is diminishing, we'll need at least what Davis was simply to get back to the unsatisfactory state that was the majority opinion here.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Vomit 1
Posted (edited)

Lets grab some OL and DL depth, then hit the draft strong.

 

Im pretty confident we can find an X “Number Two” WR, starting SS, and key rotational DT in this years draft. 

Edited by TheyCallMeAndy
Posted
1 minute ago, PBF81 said:

 

Of course, but it has nothing to do with who's earned what, it has to do with talent.  

 

Shakir's a slot WR.  Right now we have no one capable opposite Diggs.  I blame the play-calling and Diggs' use, but if it did happen to be true that his speed/abilities have diminished, Shakir in the slot ain't gonna come close to cuttin' it.  

 

The crying here over Davis' play, LOL, that's going to seem like a bonanza unless we get another WR in here.  We need to be consistent with our analyses and discussions.  IF Davis didn't cut it, and on top of that if Diggs is diminishing, we'll need at least what Davis was simply to get back to the unsatisfactory state that was the majority opinion here.  

 

 

Well then - it’s a good thing we don’t have a game next week.
 

It’s a work in progress. I’m confident the WR position will be addressed sufficiently. It’s still early. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

IMO Beane may look to do Armstead & Samuel

With what money?  Love to see the contract breakdown that makes it possible. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

Most of his significant moves have been releasing guys, no?

Releasing old guys who we carried last year because there contracts were bad, combined with hoping for a fountain of youth.  The only "trick" this offseason was getting Miller to take an actual lower salary. 

  • Disagree 2
Posted
Just now, OZBILLS said:

Beane has no tricks. He's a bum


No one even made the “Beane after dark “ joke last night 

1 minute ago, ChanticleerBillsFan said:

I would assume we are going to sign someone soon now that Armstead signed elsewhere. He was probably holding a decent amount for him. 


They have made their signing today - Ty Johnson 

Posted (edited)

Beane is going to need to crush this Draft, because these past two years, most analysts have caught on to the fact that we demand more out of Josh Allen than any team does their QB. 
 

And.. as we stand..  even if we go WR early in the Draft, this year - somehow - is shaping up to be the year we need Josh Allen to have even more demanded of him. 
 

Defense reliant upon three 30+ guys coming back from injury and an Offense that cut an above average Center and will look to replace Gabe Davis, seemingly, with a rookie. 
 

Edited by SCBills
  • Dislike 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


No one even made the “Beane after dark “ joke last night 


They have made their signing today - Ty Johnson 


I think Beane has something sexy coming in next few days.  He spent come cash resigning a few key guys, and so far has made some depth signings.  I think he’s gonna bring in at least one bigger name, either on the DL or FS position.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, strive_for_five_guy said:


I think Beane has something sexy coming in next few days.  He spent come cash resigning a few key guys, and so far has made some depth signings.  I think he’s gonna bring in at least one bigger name, either on the DL or FS position.


I have no doubt he brings in a Safety … there is no way he is going to the draft with that hole…

 

Names running out though … hope he doesn’t want to play too long a waiting game like he did with a few guys last year 

Posted
1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

IMO I want Beane may look to do Armstead & Samuel

 

FIFY

 

They got Mitchell Trubisky, Mack Hollins and Nick Morrow...what more do people want? ;) 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

Shakir's a slot WR.  Right now we have no one capable opposite Diggs.  I blame the play-calling and Diggs' use, but if it did happen to be true that his speed/abilities have diminished, Shakir in the slot ain't gonna come close to cuttin' it.  

 

The crying here over Davis' play, LOL, that's going to seem like a bonanza unless we get another WR in here.  We need to be consistent with our analyses and discussions.  IF Davis didn't cut it, and on top of that if Diggs is diminishing, we'll need at least what Davis was simply to get back to the unsatisfactory state that was the majority opinion here.  

 

I'd love to see KJ Osborn sign here, for competition's sake - he'd upgrade our weaponry experience-wise

 

Still relatively young and was productive despite being an afterthought in Minnesota

 

Probably wouldn't cost Beane a fortune to sell him on coming in here to catch lasers from Josh

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...