Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

1 minute ago, Brandon said:

 

I just don't see a place for DL (particularly DE) to make a major contribution this year.   Realistically,  a late 1st probably isn't going to beat out the established veterans at those spots,  so you're drafting depth for this year.   IMO,  they'd be better off drafting two or three of them early on day 3,  fill the depth need,  and re-evaluate after the season.  I think 2025 is supposed to be a better DL draft, anyway. 

The guy we’re talking about is not a late 1st talent. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

 

The guy we’re talking about is not a late 1st talent. 

Not to mention that McDerrmot rotates lineman. He could definitely make an impact. 
 

That said, we really need to address the WR spot, be it an early pick or some sort of veteran move. Given the cap situation I think the draft is the most likely we way to get that done (and we really should give Josh a young wr1). 

Posted
1 hour ago, nosejob said:

I would target the Steelers at 20. I'm trading a 2025 2nd (likely from Minn.) to...

 

swap 28 for 20

swap 60 for 51

receive pick 84

 

If BT is there, great, if he's gone take Latu. No way he gets to 28.

 

BTJR at 20  Sweat at 51 or Latu and move up in the 2nd for WR

Yeah, that compensation isn't happening. I'm not sure what chart you're looking at, but a 2nd in 2025 isn't getting you 8 spots in the 1st, 9 spots in the 2nd, and a 3rd Round pick. That's not even possible in Madden. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

 

The guy we’re talking about is not a late 1st talent. 

 

I actually don't have an issue with drafting Latu at 28 (I would not trade up for him given the injury issue) and yes,  he's probably better than the usual projects at DE in the late 1st.  Still,  I would be concerned that he spends most or all of the season mired as the 4th DE on the roster as he adjusts to the NFL,  especially with three established veterans ahead of him. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

DB would be even worse in Round 1.   DON'T DO IT BEANE!!!!!  I BEG YOU 😂

 

If Thomas is there I think he is the pick. If he is gone...

 

If Turner, Latu, Verse, Newton, or Murphy are there, I think they would sprint to the podium. Maybe Chop as well. 

 

If those guys are gone, and Thomas is gone, I think if Arnold, Mitchell, or DeJean are there he is going to definitely think long and hard about it. 

 

I think they would consider all of those guys over the next tier of WRs. But I still think Thomas is the pick regardless of who is there. JMO. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by MrEpsYtown
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brandon said:

 

I actually don't have an issue with drafting Latu at 28 (I would not trade up for him given the injury issue) and yes,  he's probably better than the usual projects at DE in the late 1st.  Still,  I would be concerned that he spends most or all of the season mired as the 4th DE on the roster as he adjusts to the NFL,  especially with three established veterans ahead of him. 

 

One of those vets is Von Miller. Last seen about as mobile as a broken down tractor. 

3 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

 

If Thomas is there I think he is the pick. If he is gone...

 

If Turner, Latu, Verse Newton, or Murphy are there, I think they would sprint to the podium. Maybe Chop as well. 

 

If those guys are gone, and Thomas is gone, I think if Arnold, Mitchell, or DeJean are there he is going to definitely think long and hard about it. 

 

I think they would consider all of those guys over the next tier of WRs. But I still think Thomas is the pick regardless of who is there. JMO. 

 

 

What about the OTs? If they'd consider a corner there would they not consider someone like a Mims? Maybe even a Guyton?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

One of those vets is Von Miller. Last seen about as mobile as a broken down tractor. 

 

True,  but we both know the Bills are going to give him every opportunity to prove he can still play this year,  whether he actually can or not.  

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Brandon said:

 

I actually don't have an issue with drafting Latu at 28 (I would not trade up for him given the injury issue) and yes,  he's probably better than the usual projects at DE in the late 1st.  Still,  I would be concerned that he spends most or all of the season mired as the 4th DE on the roster as he adjusts to the NFL,  especially with three established veterans ahead of him. 

I see Von, who might be finished. AJ, who’s never put it all together. And Rousseau, a legit starting edge.

 

Edge is worse or equal to WR. Both are important positions. 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, H2o said:

Yeah, that compensation isn't happening. I'm not sure what chart you're looking at, but a 2nd in 2025 isn't getting you 8 spots in the 1st, 9 spots in the 2nd, and a 3rd Round pick. That's not even possible in Madden. 

Maybe not, but no package of picks from this year will. I'm just keeping in mind there are multiple teams with 2 in the 2nd and 2 in the 3rd.

 

Right now we may probably get starters at 28 and 60 but after that?

Posted
4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

One of those vets is Von Miller. Last seen about as mobile as a broken down tractor. 

 

What about the OTs? If they'd consider a corner there would they not consider someone like a Mims? Maybe even a Guyton?

 

I think it is possible, but they just have not shown an affinity for drafting that position high, whereas they have gone after the defense quite a bit. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I see Von, who might be finished. AJ, who’s never put it all together. And Rousseau, a legit starting edge.

 

Edge is worse or equal to WR. 

Not to mention Von's probably 3rd down only.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I see Von, who might be finished. AJ, who’s never put it all together. And Rousseau, a legit starting edge.

 

Edge is worse or equal to WR. Both are important positions. 

 

Von Miller is the main question mark,  but I think they probably would have found a way to unload him with the rest if they thought it was hopeless. Regardless,  the fact is that he's still on the roster and even after the pay cut,  he's eating up a fair amount of cap space.  For better or worse,  he's likely to play plenty of snaps this year.  

 

Considering what they're paying Epenesa,  I think they're pretty happy with him as the #3.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Brandon said:

 

Von Miller is the main question mark,  but I think they probably would have found a way to unload him with the rest if they thought it was hopeless. Regardless,  the fact is that he's still on the roster and even after the pay cut,  he's eating up a fair amount of cap space.  For better or worse,  he's likely to play plenty of snaps this year.  

 

Considering what they're paying Epenesa,  I think they're pretty happy with him as the #3.  

None of those players allow you to pass on a legit 1st round edge player.

 

You create a board and stick to it. Latu is either on the board or not. If he is on it then he’s top 20 and likely the highest graded player on the board when they pick. The only WR you would draft over Latu is Brian Thomas and the big 3. But it’s a big question mark if Latu will even be on the Bills board due to the medicals.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

None of those players allow you to pass on a legit 1st round edge player.

 

You create a board and stick to it. Latu is either on the board or not. If he is on it then he’s top 20 and likely the highest graded player on the board when they pick. The only WR you would draft over Latu is Brian Thomas and the big 3. But it’s a big question mark if Latu will even be on the Bills board due to the medicals.

 

As I said,  I don't have a huge issue with taking Latu at 28.  If he stays healthy,  its a pick that should,  at worst,  pay dividends in two or three years as he develops and as DE roster turns over.  For this year?  As a rookie,  I can see a higher than normal risk that he ends up as a depth guy who plays 10 plays a game and finishes the year with 15 tackles and 2.5 sacks. 

Edited by Brandon
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brandon said:

 

As I said,  I don't have a huge issue with taking Latu at 28.  If he stays healthy,  its a pick that should,  at worst,  pay dividends in two or three years as he develops and as DE roster turns over.  For this year?  As a rookie,  I can see a higher than normal risk that he ends up as a depth guy who plays 10 plays a game and finishes the year with 15 tackles and 2.5 sacks. 

What are you talking about? As he develops? He’s a better prospect than 99% of the WRs talked about.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

What are you talking about? As he develops? He’s a better prospect than 99% of the WRs talked about.

 

Well, like any player,  I'd hope that he improves his game and is a better player two or three seasons down the road than he is as a rookie.

 

Again,  I'm not against drafting him at 28 and yes,  I would take him ahead of some of the WRs being discussed as 1st round picks on longer term potential.  But in terms of this upcoming season,  I think there's a higher risk that the immediate results are likely to be underwhelming.

 

 

 

 

Posted

I think pass rush end is a bit overrated. I prefer DE set the edge and the rush come up the middle in the QB's face. I'd rather keep guys like Mahomes in the pocket. While pass rush is a need I don't think it's as drastic as WR

Posted
10 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

I think pass rush end is a bit overrated. I prefer DE set the edge and the rush come up the middle in the QB's face. I'd rather keep guys like Mahomes in the pocket. While pass rush is a need I don't think it's as drastic as WR

 

It's not true in all cases,  but most QBs have bigger issues with pass rush right up the middle than off the edge.  On one hand,  there's a little more opportunity this year on the Bills roster for a rookie DT than at DE.  The trouble is finding a true elite pass rushing DT. 

 

I wouldn't pick one at 28,  but at 60? Sure,  if they've addressed WR. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I see Von, who might be finished. AJ, who’s never put it all together. And Rousseau, a legit starting edge.

 

Edge is worse or equal to WR. Both are important positions. 

I would have agreed on EDGE/WR being equal, but prior to Diggs trade.

 

We just lost 240 targets, between our WR1 and WR2.  I think drafting a RD1 WR has been long overdue, most will agree.  Someone who can take on 80 or so targets.  Rest of targets will get spread amongst Samuel/Kincaid/Shakir and most likely a 2nd WR drafted in the 4th or 5th.

 

At Edge, I see us addressing 4th round+ and also targeting a FA post June 1.  Similar to Floyd LY, but not holding out hopes for as much impact (at least a vet rusher to rotate).  For better/worse, Von is penciled in as a starter/rotational rusher (teaming with AJE).  With a late pick and another FA addition, I think we can be good enough up front (similar to LY).  

 

DT is where we need to start getting better push/interior pressure.

 

I see us going:

Rd1: Mitchell or Worthy

 

Rd2: Nubin or Kinchens

 

Rd3 (trade next years 2nd from Minny, to get into top 10 of this years 3rd round): Maason or Ruke

 

Rd4: DE and RB/WR

 

Rd5+: WR/RB, CB, OL

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...