TheWeatherMan Posted March 12 Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said: Not sure why ppl want to sign a WR2. Round 1 pick is likely pegged for that. We likely need a WR4, $5-6m type. Then draft a 2nd WR in middle rounds. With Diggs, Kincaid, Shakir, Knox, Cook. We need 1 very good option to add, and a couple supporting types. We need a WR 1, we all ready have a WR 2 and WR 3 3 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: lol I told y’all he was gonna get $12-$14M per and never coming here. Cookie? Quote
MasterStrategist Posted March 12 Posted March 12 Just now, TheWeatherMan said: We need a WR 1, we all ready have a WR 2 and WR 3 Cookie? Diggs is WR1. Maybe not a top 5 WR anymore, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. By definition, that's WR1 1 Quote
Mat68 Posted March 12 Posted March 12 This is why in the FA Wr thread I said avoid them all. Buffalo could easy roll with 12. Shakir, Diggs, Kincaid, and Knox. Give me Shakir over all the FA wrs. Draft one with 28 or 60 and another the top of day 3. If you go vet get a guy on a one year deal hoping Allen gets him paid. Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted March 12 Posted March 12 Just now, MasterStrategist said: Diggs is WR1. Maybe not a top 5 WR anymore, but he's still a top 15-20 guy. By definition, that's WR1 Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? 1 Quote
DCofNC Posted March 12 Posted March 12 That’s going to look like a bargain I believe, he was a pretty legit #1 prior to Fields. With all the attention going to London, Pitts and that running game.. they could be realllllly good. 1 Quote
No_Matter_What Posted March 12 Posted March 12 Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. 1 Quote
MasterStrategist Posted March 12 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, TheWeatherMan said: Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? Yeah and he was fighting thru injury it looked like Quote
The Jokeman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. I would think so. Yet they could trade down and still take a WR at #8 (but I hope not the Bills). Quote
Rigotz Posted March 12 Posted March 12 42 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said: Beane right now: I hope he stays asleep with the ridiculous values these players are going for. 1 Quote
JerseyBills Posted March 12 Posted March 12 30 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said: Did you watch the last 8 games of the season? Did you watch the first 8? He was killing it, top 3 WR numbers. You don't fall off mid season like that? I've always said he likely had a nagging injury 2 Quote
FireChans Posted March 12 Posted March 12 (edited) The king goes to the Ravens, unfortunately, Lamar is still gonna have to pass in the postseason, Edited March 12 by FireChans Quote
boyst Posted March 12 Posted March 12 10 minutes ago, Draconator said: pet peeve. Baltimore is not THE queen city. It is a Queen city. 1 Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Posted March 12 50 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting. Does this mean that they are off WR market at pick 8? They already have London, Mooney, Pitts + Robinson. I should hope so - you don't spend 3 firsts in 3 years on playmakers just to spend a 4th in a row. If anything they might be in a good spot for someone to trade up for a QB. Could always move London on draft day i suppose if you really like nabers or something. There's only one ball, and you got robinson wanting his 90-120 targets. Then you have pitts wanting probably 80-100. Then you have london wanting 100-140. Last year they had jonnu smith as the 4th option, but i would assume mooney slots in for a lot of those. There's probably snaps and targets available, but i'm not sure a first round pick there is wise, unless you are considering Pitts basically a bust. Considering their pass rush is absolute trash, and they had 8 total interceptions as a team - they probably need to add to that defense. 1 1 Quote
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, Draconator said: Likely the best fit for him. I'm very glad Beane is staying away from this first wave of RBs. 1 1 Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Posted March 12 Just now, Bruffalo said: Likely the best fit for him. I'm very glad Beane is staying away from this first wave of RBs. Wouldn't be shocked if we stayed away from the 2nd wave tbh. 1 1 Quote
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said: Wouldn't be shocked if we stayed away from the 2nd wave tbh. Considering how the market has been for RBs compared to last season, it wouldn't surprise me. RBs are getting paid this year. 1 Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 12 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Bruffalo said: Considering how the market has been for RBs compared to last season, it wouldn't surprise me. RBs are getting paid this year. The top end was tagged a year ago with jacobs, barkley, and pollard all getting it. Factoring in what they all received last year - all are basically getting a similar number AAV. Swift, Henry, Jones, Ekeler all available this year too. It was a pretty loaded market. Looking at this list - i don't see anyone who i'd pay left. Let someone else overpay. Patterson - Old and a KR only guy Mattison - Bad Elliott - bursts of good, but he was always a big hitter and now he's hitting singles instead of homers CEH - still young, coming off a terrible season Akers - still young, coming off a terrible season Foreman - big fast dude in the murray mold Scott - Put him next to damien harris Harris - See scott, plus an injury Dobbins - Can't see much of a market with all the injuries Hunt - Didn't even lead his team in carries after chubb was hurt so... i'd assume hes trending down Dillon - Big.. fast... not sure he's very dynamic though. Mckinnon - pretty much 3rd down only, would take away some cook snaps in those situations. Not an upgrade over cook, but an upgrade over murray playing on third downs blocking. 1 Quote
Bruffalo Posted March 12 Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said: The top end was tagged a year ago with jacobs, barkley, and pollard all getting it. Factoring in what they all received last year - all are basically getting a similar number AAV. Swift, Henry, Jones, Ekeler all available this year too. It was a pretty loaded market. Looking at this list - i don't see anyone who i'd pay left. Let someone else overpay. Patterson - Old and a KR only guy Mattison - Bad Elliott - bursts of good, but he was always a big hitter and now he's hitting singles instead of homers CEH - still young, coming off a terrible season Akers - still young, coming off a terrible season Foreman - big fast dude in the murray mold Scott - Put him next to damien harris Harris - See scott, plus an injury Dobbins - Can't see much of a market with all the injuries Hunt - Didn't even lead his team in carries after chubb was hurt so... i'd assume hes trending down Dillon - Big.. fast... not sure he's very dynamic though. Mckinnon - pretty much 3rd down only, would take away some cook snaps in those situations. Not an upgrade over cook, but an upgrade over murray playing on third downs blocking. Dobbins is kind of interesting if you can get him on the team for a cheap prove it type deal. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.