SCBills Posted March 8 Posted March 8 1 minute ago, NewEra said: Brutal for any trade up thoughts Given the idea we were likely going to trade around the board, this decision by the NFL basically takes away a draft pick from us. It’s going to take two early day 3 picks to even get back to the arbitrary draft pick value they decided, for whatever reason, to not give us. 1 Quote
Ethan in Cleveland Posted March 8 Posted March 8 This sucks. Picking 30+ spots later really hurts. 1 2 Quote
MJS Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Did any other teams have lower picks than expected, or just the Bills? Quote
dave mcbride Posted March 8 Posted March 8 It's mystifying. Edmunds was the fourth highest-paid LB last year and received the fifth biggest contract in FA in 2023. Is it all based on position? If so, LB is below D-line, o-line, WR, and QB in terms of AAV paid. The fact that the Bengals only got sixths for losing two top-level safeties suggestions that positional worth might be a factor. 1 minute ago, MJS said: Did any other teams have lower picks than expected, or just the Bills? Bengals got only sixths for the two very good safeties they lost. I am starting to think that overall positional value plays a role. 1 Quote
BillsSbSoon Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Would really like to hear beane comment on this. He’s prolly pretty pissed right now 1 Quote
Don Otreply Posted March 8 Posted March 8 I’m telling ya, it’s the “smoking man” y’all just think it’s TV, but its real homey…, 3 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 1 minute ago, OldTimer1960 said: Scratch trading up in the first. Depends on how high they want to move up. Could throw in next year's 3rd...less valuable but still Quote
beebe Posted March 8 Posted March 8 It's ridiculous that this isn't known way sooner. Teams are making plans, signing free agents, etc, based on incomplete info that could easily be provided earlier. The Bills now have a late 1st round pick, a late 2nd round pick, and nine picks that are essentially 5th round or later (the 4th rounders are picks #129 and #133), basically the equivalent of picking at the top of the 5th. This is in a draft that most experts say is top heavy and falls off a cliff after the first three rounds. 1 1 Quote
Mark Vader Posted March 8 Posted March 8 This sucks! Consider trading down from the first into the second. 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Are there any players we could move for a 3rd? Rasul? Elam? Knox? Quote
Blank Stare Posted March 8 Posted March 8 BS. Of course this happens to the Bills. Most unprecedented or impossible things do. Quote
RangerDave Posted March 8 Posted March 8 1 hour ago, MJS said: What's the formula for determining these, anyway? Ancient Chinese secret 5 Quote
jkeerie Posted March 8 Posted March 8 51 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Now I would really like Beane to trade down in Round 1 if possible, even to the top of Round 2 if needed. The realistic WR targets there - Coleman, Franklin, Legette - are likely still going to be available a few picks later. Get a 3rd rounder if at all possible. Also with all of these day 3 picks in our bag I would actually use all of them, don't be tempted to trade them away to move up the board. We need the bottom of our roster to get a lot cheaper and start maximizing the value of day 3 rookie contracts. If we plan it right we will be able to make one splash signing in FA because we won't have all our money tied up in overpaid rotational/depth players. This makes sense especially if the Bills are targeting WR with their first pick. They could drop down a few slots, recoup a 3rd round pick and still have a nice selection of WR targets. 1 Quote
Nitro Posted March 8 Posted March 8 NFL better explain how they down graded it to a 4th since it was given to be a 3rd (prior precedent) 2 Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Completely arbitrary process is completely arbitrary Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Just now, Nitro said: NFL better explain how they down graded it to a 4th since it was given to be a 3rd (prior precedent) could an appeal and amendment be possible? Quote
OldTimer1960 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Depends on how high they want to move up. Could throw in next year's 3rd...less valuable but still Well, you are right that they could. I don’t think that would be smart business. With the state of the defense, they will probably be picking earlier in each round next year. I would not trade that away. Quote
Dr. Who Posted March 8 Posted March 8 4 minutes ago, Blank Stare said: BS. Of course this happens to the Bills. Most unprecedented or impossible things do. It's the home game in London experiment part 2. 1 1 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.