Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, NewEra said:

Brutal for any trade up thoughts 


Given the idea we were likely going to trade around the board, this decision by the NFL basically takes away a draft pick from us. 
 

It’s going to take two early day 3 picks to even get back to the arbitrary draft pick value they decided, for whatever reason, to not give us.  

  • Agree 1
Posted

It's mystifying. Edmunds was the fourth highest-paid LB last year and received the fifth biggest contract in FA in 2023. 

 

Is it all based on position? If so, LB is below D-line, o-line, WR, and QB in terms of AAV paid. The fact that the Bengals only got sixths for losing two top-level safeties suggestions that positional worth might be a factor. 

1 minute ago, MJS said:

Did any other teams have lower picks than expected, or just the Bills?

Bengals got only sixths for the two very good safeties they lost. I am starting to think that overall positional value plays a role. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I’m telling ya, it’s the “smoking man” 

y’all just think it’s TV, but its real homey…, 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

It's ridiculous that this isn't known way sooner. Teams are making plans, signing free agents, etc, based on incomplete info that could easily be provided earlier. 

 

The Bills now have a late 1st round pick, a late 2nd round pick, and nine picks that are essentially 5th round or later (the 4th rounders are picks #129 and #133), basically the equivalent of picking at the top of the 5th. This is in a draft that most experts say is top heavy and falls off a cliff after the first three rounds.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Angry 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Now I would really like Beane to trade down in Round 1 if possible, even to the top of Round 2 if needed. The realistic WR targets there - Coleman, Franklin, Legette - are likely still going to be available a few picks later. Get a 3rd rounder if at all possible.

 

Also with all of these day 3 picks in our bag I would actually use all of them, don't be tempted to trade them away to move up the board. We need the bottom of our roster to get a lot cheaper and start maximizing the value of day 3 rookie contracts. If we plan it right we will be able to make one splash signing in FA because we won't have all our money tied up in overpaid rotational/depth players.

This makes sense especially if the Bills are targeting WR with their first pick.  They could drop down a few slots, recoup a 3rd round pick and still have a nice selection of WR targets.  

  • Agree 1
Posted

NFL better explain how they down graded it to a 4th since it was given to be a 3rd (prior precedent)

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

Depends on how high they want to move up.  Could throw in next year's 3rd...less valuable but still 

Well, you are right that they could.  I don’t think that would be smart business.  With the state of the defense, they will probably be picking earlier in each round next year.  I would not trade that away.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Blank Stare said:

BS. Of course this happens to the Bills. Most unprecedented or impossible things do. 

It's the home game in London experiment part 2.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...