Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

The 3rd is cuz their minority DC got hired as HC in Houston.

I’m actually surprised no one has sued over that rule.  It is blatantly illegal.  I’m guessing no one wants to rock the boat…would be career suicide.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No but they did lose a minority coordinator to a HC position and a starting Quarterback to free agency. That explains their 3rd and their 4th and shouldn't surprise anyone. Some of their later picks do seem to be from teams overpaying former 49ers in free agency at the mid range. 

They should have a reverse comp pick……lose a 3rd…..for shedding Jimmy G.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Brand J said:

Trade 6 players for one? No thanks. The rounds may be lower, but that doesn’t mean gems can’t be had in the 5th and 6th.

 

Nah I was joking.  I dont get the excitement over 11 picks if 7 of them are 5th round and on. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Punt the pick to Denver for Courtland Sutton


Have you seen his contract ? They won’t pay him $14m a year 

Edited by Aussie Joe
Posted
Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:


how so?  If we re-signed Gabe he’d be getting around the same $ 


And they won’t be doing that either… but at least they don’t have to give up a draft pick to pay Davis…

 

They aren’t in a position to trade for a WR 2 and then pay them $14m a year regardless of how much they kick down the road 

Posted
Just now, Aussie Joe said:


And they won’t be doing that either… but at least they don’t have to give up a draft pick to pay Davis…

 

They aren’t in a position to trade for a WR 2 and then pay them $14m a year regardless of how much they kick down the road 


time will tell 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bermuda Triangle said:

How is it illegal?

It is overt and explicit discrimination on the basis of race…always illegal. The way they have structured the rule would make it a bit more  difficult to bring a successful case, but I don’t think there is any way that program would withstand legal scrutiny.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No but they did lose a minority coordinator to a HC position and a starting Quarterback to free agency. That explains their 3rd and their 4th and shouldn't surprise anyone. Some of their later picks do seem to be from teams overpaying former 49ers in free agency at the mid range. 

So now you know the formula?  Please do share.

Posted
5 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said:

So now you know the formula?  Please do share.

 

Well clearly nobody knows the formula as well as they thought but there are some things that are very simple about it:

 

1. You lose a minority coordinator to a HC position or senior personnel guy to a GM position and you are awarded two 3rd round comp picks in the subsequent two drafts. 

 

2. The remaining picks are broadly issued by AAV contract value of free agents lost. The 49ers lost Jimmy G to a the richest FA contract given out last spring. 

 

The only things that are different from the projections from Over The Cap who explain the formula very clearly and do a great job with projections are Jimmy G and Tremaine being assigned 4th round value instead of 3rd round value which was projected. Everything else was exactly as those who understand the way that formula has been applied the past few years expected. 

 

So when people say "how the hell has San Francisco got all these picks?" The answer is they llst a minority coordinator to be a HC, they lost a starting QB in free agency and they lost a bunch of other qualifying role players.

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

The only things that are different from the projections from Over The Cap who explain the formula very clearly and do a great job with projections are Jimmy G and Tremaine being assigned 4th round value instead of 3rd round value

 

 

Oh, so just a full round lower.  No biggie.  So just a guess.

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said:

Oh, so just a full round lower.  No biggie.  So just a guess.

 

Yes a full round. There are no half rounds. 

 

Keep thinking it is a conspiracy though if it helps you feel better. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yes a full round. There are no half rounds. 

 

Keep thinking it is a conspiracy though if it helps you feel better. 

 

He's still grinding that "you guys hypothesized that maybe Beane might move Douglas" axe.

  • Eyeroll 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...