BillsFanNC Posted May 5 Author Share Posted May 5 Conflict of interest: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 25 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Conflict of interest: The thread is about Uncle Clarence. If you can't keep up, drop out. Such language described by Orwell is called doublespeak. It is explained by William Lutz, author of the book “Doublespeak”, as language which “makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant appear attractive or at least tolerable. It is language that conceals or prevents thought.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: The thread is about Uncle Clarence. If you can't keep up, drop out. Such language described by Orwell is called doublespeak. It is explained by William Lutz, author of the book “Doublespeak”, as language which “makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant appear attractive or at least tolerable. It is language that conceals or prevents thought.” Actually it's about your silly conspiracies. You can't even name one case, only conspiracies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 5 Author Share Posted May 5 Hey Quack... You listening? Closer.. ***** OFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 REMINDER: The usual PPP suspects whine and spin their 'takes' on Justice Thomas, then howl in protest when the left's organized assault on the Supreme Court is documented. No matter, their complaints will get them nowhere, despite their spittle-ridden posts. Not ONE example of a case that his opinion has been 'compromised' on has been given. Why is that ? Don't bother, there isn't any. . 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 hour ago, B-Man said: REMINDER: The usual PPP suspects whine and spin their 'takes' on Justice Thomas, then howl in protest when the left's organized assault on the Supreme Court is documented. No matter, their complaints will get them nowhere, despite their spittle-ridden posts. Not ONE example of a case that his opinion has been 'compromised' on has been given. Why is that ? Don't bother, there isn't any. . the justices unanimously signed a document explaining the rules of ethics. There was no "slamming" of D senators in the signed letter. You and the writer of this article are mischaracterizing it at best, lying at worst. The letter in no way implies that they unanimously agree that all members are following them. The chief justice's refusal to appear before a senate subcommittee based on the premise that few other justices have appeared before congress is weak but within his rights. This is the case example I alluded to: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf. Others have cited other examples. Watch the hearings and find out..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 18 Author Share Posted May 18 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Another week, another wave of fake Justice Thomas smears. Just like clockwork. They are so scared o the Supreme Court stopping their "revolution" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 13 minutes ago, B-Man said: Another week, another wave of fake Justice Thomas smears. Just like clockwork. They are so scared o the Supreme Court stopping their "revolution" "Smear" meaning something else proved about this best judge money can buy Justice Thomas acknowledges two 2019 trips paid for by Harlan Crow The required annual reports, covering activity in 2023 Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was granted an extension to file his report, as he has received in past years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Clarence Thomas accounts for 85% of all gift value given to SCOTUS justices in the past two decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 The ‘Fix’ Is in With the Latest Attack on Clarence Thomas A report from a self-styled non-ideological Supreme Court watchdog is filled with errors and omissions. By Mark Paoletta It’s late in the Supreme Court’s term, which means it’s hunting season for the justices’ detractors. As usual, Clarence Thomas is a prime target. Fix the Court, which styles itself a nonpartisan advocate for “non-ideological ‘fixes’ ” to make the judiciary “more open and more accountable”—released a chart purporting to show that Justice Thomas has received almost $4.2 million in gifts and “likely gifts” between 2004 and 2023. The other 16 justices who served during that period, according to the chart, received a combined total of less than $600,000 in gifts. That includes a mere $3,150 for Justice Anthony Kennedy, $55,014 for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and $15,500 for Justice Stephen Breyer. Can that be true? No. A review of Fix the Court’s claims shows multiple errors and deceptions: {snip} In an August 2023 story, ProPublica claimed Justice Thomas took “a voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas.” That trip never happened. When a lawyer for the yacht’s owner submitted a letter to that effect to the Senate Judiciary Committee, ProPublica quietly appended an “update” to its article without acknowledging the error. ProPublica this month published an article titled “Harlan Crow Provided Clarence Thomas at Least 3 Previously Undisclosed Private Jet Trips, Senate Probe Finds.” As it has done before, the organization failed to cite the Judicial Conference’s 2012 ruling that these trips weren’t subject to disclosure. Like Fix the Court, ProPublica aims to smear disfavored justices, not to report honestly on the court. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fix-is-in-with-the-latest-attack-on-clarence-thomas-scotus-c64453aa?st=0gmnqgus2hurke0 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Justice Thomas: "In this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a President 'is not above the law.' But, as the Court explains, the President’s immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law... Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices. And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law. Those questions must be answered before this prosecution can proceed. We must respect the Constitution’s separation of powers in all its forms, else we risk rendering its protection of liberty a parchment guarantee." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Two of these justices should have recused themselves. Just no ethics, justice or rule of law in this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Just now, B-Man said: What a cute little fascist you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Just now, Tiberius said: What a cute little fascist you are. Things have gone completely down the sh*tter for you since roughly 9:03pm last Thursday but you can do this. Stay strong! Billieve! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Things have gone completely down the sh*tter for you since roughly 9:03pm last Thursday but you can do this. Stay strong! Billieve! Ya, what to worry about, the Supreme Court just gave the guy who tried to violently overthrow the will of the majority a pass. Nothing to see here, just keep moving Dark future, here we come 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts