Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


could also not have major guarantees in year 2

 

if they sign another and draft one it could be 3 guys less than 10m  

agreed. no word on guarantees yet.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Success said:

We missed him against KC.  

 

He's a solid player, and still pretty young.  Good w/ this.

 

I agree.  I thought he was really starting to come on late in the season.  Plays with great energy.  Flies to the ball.  I like this signing.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

I agree.  I thought he was really starting to come on late in the season.  Plays with great energy.  Flies to the ball.  I like this signing.

Stats support this, he only missed 3 (5.7%) and gave up 11 catches on 18 targets, which isn’t bad. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I'd bet my bottom dollar that the words "up to" are doing a lot of heavy lifting in the "can earn up to x amount" signing announcement.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

As long as he figures out how to pick up his effing head when arriving 2nd to the ball carrier moving forward, I'm happy with this. Lotta unfortunate and compromising collisions can be avoided if he stops lowering his helmet like a dummy. Mostly he'll do his own guys (and himself) a favor. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

Rapp brings some physicality to a defense that practically has none. Nice signing and would like 3 or 4 more with some attitude, please. 

Edited by JimmyNoodles
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Richard Noggin said:

As long as he figures out how to pick up his effing head when arriving 2nd to the ball carrier moving forward, I'm happy with this. Lotta unfortunate and compromising collisions can be avoided if he stops lowering his helmet like a dummy. Mostly he'll do his own guys (and himself) a favor. 

I agree.  I think we both love his aggressive play, but he makes some bone head decisions.  Pull it back 10%, get your head up and hit with controlled violence. 

Edited by SoonerBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, MWK said:

What a terrible deal. He was a liability last year. Personal fouls incoming.

He was one of our most physical defensive players. He didn’t play much because he was behind two all pros that McD was not sitting despite below average play. I thought when Poyer and Hyde were out the D looked stronger with Rapp filling in. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

At worst he’s a capable safety, not a ballhawk by any means. Maybe a little too much Donte Whitner to his game. That said, I like the move, I’d almost guarantee this deal is back heavy with this year not counting much more than $2M-$3M against the cap.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

2 things:

 

1. "Up to" means best-case scenario. Maybe he only earns 10 million and he's a 3.4 million player. I can live with that. And if he hits incentives and makes 4.5 million a year, bully for him.

2. McD knows his secondary. He ain't perfect as a coach, far from it, but he knows his defensive backs. I'll trust his judgment here, especially after turning Poyer and Hyde into a top safety unit after they were JAGs, over other opinions here.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Most likely McD will be able to mold him into a solid starter.  That’s his specialty. And he is fearless.  

Edited by nedboy7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Thought he really came on last year - INT v Miami one of the best plays of the year.  

 

I think it was more a really poor decision and throw than a great play by Rapp.

 

My initial instinct is that I don't like this deal. At times I thought that Rapp was a liability on the field and he appears to be in the Jordan Phillips mold of committing incredibly stupid penalties at the worst times.

 

I'll wait to see what the contract actually looks like though before fully judging it. The initial headline pumped out by the agent is probably laughably overstated. But I think there will be true starting caliber safeties on the market for a similar cost so I don't know why we rushed to get this extension done.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NickelCity said:

I hope it's for big nickel. But weird move, Beane. 

 

That's an interesting thought. Maybe they see him as Siran Neal's replacement, similar cost but gives you more on defense.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...