zow2 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 I was at the Houston game a few years ago, in the rain. Mitch came in to mop up late. He looked good! Go Bills 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Can Mitch be 3rd with Tyrod Taylor as backup? Please?! His time in Pitt was rough. But, he’s a clear upgrade from Kyle Allen 2 Quote
babulator Posted March 7 Posted March 7 (edited) QB2 isn't gonna win us a championship, if JA17 goes down so do our chances of winning it. That said, providing its a low end deal, he can come in and manage a game or two in a pinch. I don't hate this, and drafting someone here, now that won't get an opportunity to grow doesn't make a ton of sense. We need to use those picks elsewhere and keep/play them. This makes sense. Edited March 7 by babulator Quote
Chicken Boo Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Trubisky is terrible and lucky to still be in the league at this point. This would be money wasted. 1 1 2 1 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 15 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Can Mitch be 3rd with Tyrod Taylor as backup? Please?! His time in Pitt was rough. But, he’s a clear upgrade from Kyle Allen We don't keep 3 on the active roster. Mitch is the most we've done at Backup since... well, Mitch. Quote
Brandon Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Again, depending on the contract, I like it. If he has to play, at least there's some talent there to work with. At worst, he should be better than Kyle Allen. Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Trubisky is terrible and lucky to still be in the league at this point. This would be money wasted. Did you prefer Kyle Allen? Backups suck. That's why they're Backups. There isn't even 32 good Starters in the league. Good Backups go to teams to be Bridge QB's or to teams that have a questionable starter, whether it be performance or injury issues. And they're paid well too. None of those things apply here. Our Backup is always going to be a Mitch, Keenum, Barkley, Kyle Allen type. Edited March 7 by BillsFanForever19 1 Quote
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 7 Posted March 7 9 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Trubisky is terrible and lucky to still be in the league at this point. This would be money wasted. How many backup QB's is that not true of? Quote
Steptide Posted March 7 Posted March 7 I actually like this. I feel like Pittsburgh was never a great fit for trubisky. 1 Quote
thenorthremembers Posted March 7 Posted March 7 More than fine with this. Bills doing a good job of filling holes prior to free agency. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Just now, BillsFanForever19 said: Did you prefer Kyle Allen? Backups suck. That's why they're Backups. There isn't even 32 good Starters in the league. Good Backups go to teams to be Bridge QB's or to teams that have anl questionable starter or at least one that has injury issues. And they're paid well too. None of those things apply here. Our Backup is always going to be a Mitch, Keenum, Barkley, Kyle Allen type. I'll take a Keenum any day over a Trubisky. Why not try to get better at the position? Maybe you hit on a Brock Purdy late in the draft or some other mobile QB. 1 minute ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said: How many backup QB's is that not true of? Tyrod, Minshew and Wentz are out there. All are much better options than Trubisky - unless Beane feels the price would be too high. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted March 7 Posted March 7 (edited) One of the most surprising moves of the day IMO…( maybe except for Morse cut).. I said when this idea was discussed last month, that another team would pay him more money than the Bills would to be their backup .. Hope they aren’t paying him too much more than the minimum Edited March 7 by Aussie Joe Quote
Warcodered Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Just now, Chicken Boo said: I'll take a Keenum any day over a Trubisky. Why not try to get better at the position? Maybe you hit on a Brock Purdy late in the draft or some other mobile QB. Do they come with their own 49ers O-line, weapons and system included? because sign me up. Purdy was better than the system QB label he keeps getting stuck with as he's played as well as he has but the idea he'd just fit here is a little over the top. 1 Quote
Chandler#81 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 (edited) Just announced Edited March 7 by Chandler#81 6 1 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.