Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Niagara Dude said:

Bringing back Haack is a loser move,  the guy has a weak leg and has no business being on the Bills.  This has McDermott's high character guy connection to it,  just draft a kid with one of the many late rounders  the Bills have.  Martin and Hacck are garbage and Bills need to move forward

He also is a holder. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

 

That's what I said isn't it?

You said he's a UFA, implying this year, when someone asked if he'd been cut.  He's under contract through 2025.

Posted
21 minutes ago, jkeerie said:

You said he's a UFA, implying this year, when someone asked if he'd been cut.  He's under contract through 2025.

 

Hmm I don't think that's accurate 🤔

Posted
2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

He also is a holder. 

Does not matter,  they just signed a very capable backup QB.  We need a punter who can flip the field and neither Hacck or Martin are the guy

Posted
19 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

Does not matter,  they just signed a very capable backup QB.  We need a punter who can flip the field and neither Hacck or Martin are the guy

How often do Bills punt from deep in their territory? We just need 40-45 yards consistently. 

Posted
On 3/6/2024 at 1:42 PM, Lost said:

Matt Araiza was just chilling out there all off season and we bring back Matt freaking Haack??  He has like a 20yd punt average with the Bills

Trust the Beane.

Posted
4 hours ago, Niagara Dude said:

Does not matter,  they just signed a very capable backup QB.  We need a punter who can flip the field and neither Hacck or Martin are the guy

What does that have to do with holding? 

Posted
23 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Wooden shock me if this was more about bass than it is about anything else
 

 

 

You nailed it . I heard them talking on 1 Bills Live that Bass had his best year when Haack was his holder & last year he didn't do so well & they said that is the reason why they brought him back is to see if that actually had something to do with him having a down season .

Posted
2 hours ago, T master said:

 

You nailed it . I heard them talking on 1 Bills Live that Bass had his best year when Haack was his holder & last year he didn't do so well & they said that is the reason why they brought him back is to see if that actually had something to do with him having a down season .

Sorry to say, but if Bass needs a specific holder to do his job, he can go. And I’m a Bass fan, but I think the yips never truly leave a kicker and will pop up at another point in his career.

  • Agree 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...