BillStime Posted March 6 Author Posted March 6 Gee, I wonder who runs the House of Representatives…  US Congress eyes Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve sale, closure  idiotsÂ
sherpa Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Thankfully, Biden is a liar.  "As he campaigned for president in 2020, Joe Biden responded to a New Hampshire town hall question unequivocally, adding repetition for emphasis. "No more drilling on federal lands," he said Feb. 9, 2020. "Period. Period. Period. Period."  Biden repeated his stance a month later, saying at a presidential primary debate: "No more drilling on federal lands. No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends."  Three years later, the Biden administration disappointed supporters of his climate change policy by approving a major drilling project in Alaska."  See provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act to understand why Biden was legally bound to approve drilling. It wasn't his choice, not that anyone would know, it was a legal requirement.  The man would drill through his mother's grave if it meant getting a vote. He is an airbag. Nothing of substance.  But at least he was stupid enough to inform us at last year's State of the Union that we would need fossil fuels for at least ten years, resulting in laughter from both sides and in every household who happened to be watching.  2
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Posted March 6 5 minutes ago, sherpa said: Thankfully, Biden is a liar.  "As he campaigned for president in 2020, Joe Biden responded to a New Hampshire town hall question unequivocally, adding repetition for emphasis. "No more drilling on federal lands," he said Feb. 9, 2020. "Period. Period. Period. Period."  Biden repeated his stance a month later, saying at a presidential primary debate: "No more drilling on federal lands. No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends."  Three years later, the Biden administration disappointed supporters of his climate change policy by approving a major drilling project in Alaska."  See provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act to understand why Biden was legally bound to approve drilling. It wasn't his choice, not that anyone would know, it was a legal requirement.  The man would drill through his mother's grave if it meant getting a vote. He is an airbag. Nothing of substance.  But at least he was stupid enough to inform us at last year's State of the Union that we would need fossil fuels for at least ten years, resulting in laughter from both sides and in every household who happened to be watching.   I wonder what changed...  Â
sherpa Posted March 6 Posted March 6 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: Â I wonder what changed... Â Â Shirly you can't be serious. Â He makes no decisions. He has no substance. His staff tells him what to do to appease voters and he is the puppet of their desires, all designed for votes. Idiotic energy policy with countless flips, including begging the Saudis to not announce OPEC production cuts until after the US mid terms. Releasing reserves from the strategic petroleum reserve for unintended reasons. Â He is useless. Â Â 1 1 2
Capco Posted March 6 Posted March 6 9 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:  They used a picture of propane tanks for a story about gasoline reserves? lol 3
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Posted March 6 10 minutes ago, sherpa said:  Shirly you can't be serious.  He makes no decisions. He has no substance. His staff tells him what to do to appease voters and he is the puppet of their desires, all designed for votes. Idiotic energy policy with countless flips, including begging the Saudis to not announce OPEC production cuts until after the US mid terms. Releasing reserves from the strategic petroleum reserve for unintended reasons.  He is useless.    Yea, well, Covid hit, Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military support; then the world started to open up; people started driving, demand was high; supply was low; gas prices skyrocketed and then Putin invaded Ukraine - Biden had to do something, right?      1
sherpa Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, BillStime said:  Yea, well, Covid hit, Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military support; then the world started to open up; people started driving, demand was high; supply was low; gas prices skyrocketed and then Putin invaded Ukraine - Biden had to do something, right?  This is where you and he completely miss. There was absolutely no need to do put his moronic policy in place the second he took office, which he did. Grossly stupid.  Yet he did it, and a number of energy projects were shelved as the result. These things take close to a decade to spool up.  So you get the Russian invasion. Europe, and Germany in particular are caught with potentially catastrophic supply problems heading into 2022 winter. The US is in much worse position to backstop supply and you get what you get.  Totally stupid. Totally unforced.  The Trump suggestion is idiotic, not that you haven't puked it out before. Trump was trying to protect the US energy industry as the Saudis were trying to get prices so low it would end further US production. Different time, and the right thing to do.  Stick to the sex stuff vs. Trump. I couldn't care less, but Biden and his bizarre energy moves are indefensible from a strategic and logical perspective, as well as being exposed as grossly political and without conscience.  2 1
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Posted March 6 23 minutes ago, sherpa said: There was absolutely no need to do put his moronic policy in place the second he took office, which he did. Grossly stupid. Can you highlights those EOs that directly impacted our energy dependence?  27 minutes ago, sherpa said: So you get the Russian invasion. Europe, and Germany in particular are caught with potentially catastrophic supply problems heading into 2022 winter. The US is in much worse position to backstop supply and you get what you get. Cute  Biden granted more oil and gas drilling permits than Trump in his first 2 years .  30 minutes ago, sherpa said: The Trump suggestion is idiotic, not that you haven't puked it out before. Trump was trying to protect the US energy industry as the Saudis were trying to get prices so low it would end further US production. Different time, and the right thing to do. Wrong - Trump did this in April 2020.  31 minutes ago, sherpa said: Stick to the sex stuff vs. Trump. I couldn't care less, but Biden and his bizarre energy moves are indefensible from a strategic and logical perspective, as well as being exposed as grossly political and without conscience. You seem upset with facts.  Bottom line - Biden is crushing it on the economy and energy front.     1
sherpa Posted March 6 Posted March 6 11 minutes ago, BillStime said: Can you highlights those EOs that directly impacted our energy dependence?  Cute  Biden granted more oil and gas drilling permits than Trump in his first 2 years .  Wrong - Trump did this in April 2020.  You seem upset with facts.   Bottom line - Biden is crushing it on the economy and energy front.  Do you intentionally theorize that people here don't know of what they speak? Do you think that enough people don't care enough to scrutinize what you say that they will believe any of your nonsense? Do you think there are more than two people here who think that Trump actually claimed that "good people" included Nazis and white supremacists?  Per your claim, Trump did this in April of 2020. Do you know how this claim proves my point and makes you look a fool? Do you know what the price of a barrel of oil was at the date you mentioned he suggested this. Here's a clue. High $30's, in fact companies were paying for people to take oil supply off their hands, as there was no more storage capacity.  Here genius: https://www.cnn.com/business/live-news/stock-market-news-042020/index.html  I don't think you have any idea about any of this, and I'm becoming quite certain you don't have the capacity to understand basic stuff.          1 1
BillStime Posted March 7 Author Posted March 7 (edited) 40 minutes ago, sherpa said:  Do you intentionally theorize that people here don't know of what they speak? Do you think that enough people don't care enough to scrutinize what you say that they will believe any of your nonsense? Do you think there are more than two people here who think that Trump actually claimed that "good people" included Nazis and white supremacists?  Per your claim, Trump did this in April of 2020. Do you know how this claim proves my point and makes you look a fool? Do you know what the price of a barrel of oil was at the date you mentioned he suggested this. Here's a clue. High $30's, in fact companies were paying for people to take oil supply off their hands, as there was no more storage capacity.  Here genius: https://www.cnn.com/business/live-news/stock-market-news-042020/index.html  I don't think you have any idea about any of this, and I'm becoming quite certain you don't have the capacity to understand basic stuff.          lmao - you inadvertently left out the kitchen sink in your pouting but face it - Trump’s energy policies were killing the industry even before COVID.  The oil industry actually hasn’t done that well under Trump  And you still don’t want to share what policy Biden enacted on day 1?    Edited March 7 by BillStime
sherpa Posted March 7 Posted March 7 15 minutes ago, BillStime said: lmao - you inadvertently left out the kitchen sink in your pouting but face it - Trump’s energy policies were killing the industry even before COVID.  The oil industry actually hasn’t done that well under Trump  And you still don’t want to share what policy Biden enacted on day 1?     I don't take homework assignments. But....during his campaign, he stated he was going to end all drilling. On day one, to answer your challenge, he ended the Keystone Pipeline. Please don't suggest that you know anything about that being an export asset. I pay close attention to the energy markets and there were far reaching effects of that, along with his swearing to end all drilling.  I was too kind in responding to you earlier. You have absolutely no idea about the energy markets and history, and expose yourself a fool when you post about that issue, as you have above. The fact is that when Trump suggested, wisely, that the Saudis limit production, oil had reached negative value due to covid. Producers were actually willing to pay to take it off their hands. There was no storage capacity available,  You make the same mistake over and over, along with the other guy. The real and economic world make no sense to you because your view is so politically distorted. Not worth the time.  By the way, people who have traded for years, and do it on a daily basis never talk about it, and know signs of phonies who claim to have "investments off the charts." Recognize that phrase?    1 1 1
BillStime Posted March 7 Author Posted March 7 1 hour ago, sherpa said:  I don't take homework assignments. But....during his campaign, he stated he was going to end all drilling. On day one, to answer your challenge, he ended the Keystone Pipeline. Please don't suggest that you know anything about that being an export asset. I pay close attention to the energy markets and there were far reaching effects of that, along with his swearing to end all drilling.  I was too kind in responding to you earlier. You have absolutely no idea about the energy markets and history, and expose yourself a fool when you post about that issue, as you have above. The fact is that when Trump suggested, wisely, that the Saudis limit production, oil had reached negative value due to covid. Producers were actually willing to pay to take it off their hands. There was no storage capacity available,  You make the same mistake over and over, along with the other guy. The real and economic world make no sense to you because your view is so politically distorted. Not worth the time.  By the way, people who have traded for years, and do it on a daily basis never talk about it, and know signs of phonies who claim to have "investments off the charts." Recognize that phrase?     If you're truly a thought leader in energy markets, you wouldn't fall for the right-wing Keystone Pipeline hoax.  The Keystone pipeline wasn't projected to be operational until 2023. The U.S. continued to receive oil from Canada through railways, other pipelines and the original Keystone pipeline.  Bottom line - this pipeline had no impact on gas prices.  As the world reopened - the supply could not keep pace with the immediate surge in demand.  You’re just pissed that Biden is KILlING it and your guy conned the F out of you.  Keep whining.
US Egg Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Make no mistake, Biden is limiting oil production in the U.S. Â He recently approved the smallest offshore oil program in history.
Recommended Posts