Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, 947 said:

Beane needs to find the next Poyer/Hyde, an underutilized or mis-cast CB from another team who fits our Safety mold & won't cost too much.

 

Alohi Gilman from the Chargers. High upside and won't be expensive.

Posted
2 hours ago, 947 said:

Beane needs to find the next Poyer/Hyde, an underutilized or mis-cast CB from another team who fits our Safety mold & won't cost too much.

 

I had failed high-pedigree guys like CJ Henderson and Kristian Fulton on my short list for that. Young guys who were highly touted corners and for whatever reason it just hasn't worked out should maybe consider a move to safety. 

Posted

The coaching staff is probably best at developing players at CB and Safety.  I'm w/ the posters who advocate going w/ more youth on this one.

 

Posted

Safety is going to be interesting because.. yea, we need to get younger there.  Also, these free agent Safeties have zero negotiating power.  If you want a solid vet for cheap... you're going to get a solid vet for cheap. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Big Turk said:

 

No. He is clearly heading downward...no need to add aging expensive players who are over the hill but who still think they are worth big money.

Was thinking we could get him on the cheap. If not I definitely agree

Posted

Particularly at a position like safety, I don't think an old name player is the way to go.  Ideally can find someone the way they found Poyer and Hyde.  Find players who have flashed talent but haven't had an opportunity for whatever reason.

Posted

There is a burgeoning free agency period in November where old vets sign on with teams for a playoff run.  Diggs will be one of these players.

 

Unless you're a team that doesn't care about the 2024 season, you aren't giving starter minutes to a 32-year old safety.  

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

Is this a Williams thing?  We gotta stocking up on players named Diggs now?

I know right? I miss the glory days when we focused our attention on having OL with male anatomy sounding names. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, BIGFOOTspaceman said:

This didn’t age well

 

I'd still rather that is what they did. They have gone a different direction. I get it. Not the decision I'd have made.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...