gjv Posted March 5 Posted March 5 I would guess that Beane, McDermott, and Kromer didn't want to trade Bates. But getting cap-compliant is going to be full of unwanted moves. 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Bigvinny said: Greg Cover 1 @GregTompsett Random side note. Since Bates was a UDFA, if we had simply not matched Chicago’s original offer and let him go, BUF would have gotten no draft compensation. Instead they got 1 year of starting play, 1 year of backup depth and a 5th round pick That’s all true, but I’d counter that his level of play as a starter was below average and the above came at a cost of $9M in cash and cap space. Not the end of the world or anything, but no one should be thinking this was a W for the Bills. Especially when they could’ve kept him in 2022 for less with a higher tender. Edited March 5 by BarleyNY Quote
Westside Posted March 5 Posted March 5 11 hours ago, Augie said: We OWN the 5th round! It’s like the 12th Man, we own that round. Have we already won the draft? lol Quote
Spiderweb Posted March 5 Posted March 5 I do NOT like this move. A 5th round pick for a very solid OL player who can play tackle to center. I guess Beane wants to have no depth anymore... 1 Quote
Westside Posted March 5 Posted March 5 21 minutes ago, wppete said: Rome Odunze. Calling it right now! When in Rome......... 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 I actually disagree with the sentiment we won’t use the vast majority of these picks. I think we’ll make an early trade to get a guy of need but this team desperately needs to get young and quick. 1 Quote
SoCal Deek Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: I do NOT like this move. A 5th round pick for a very solid OL player who can play tackle to center. I guess Beane wants to have no depth anymore... If I understand our Cap position he really has no choice. He pretty much has to unload any and all redundancy (depth) that he’s got. And if he can get a draft pick in return, then that’s better than just releasing guys for nothing. Edited March 5 by SoCal Deek Quote
Spiderweb Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Just now, SoCal Deek said: If I understand our Cap position he really has no choice. He pretty much has to unload any and all redundancy (depth) that he’s got. And if he can get a draft pick in return, then that’s better than just releasing guys for nothing. Maybe so but the cap problem was of Beane's own making. Can we cut Beane instead? 1 1 1 Quote
JGMcD2 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 2 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: Maybe so but the cap problem was of Beane's own making. Can we cut Beane instead? What’s your solution? Not sign players to make the team competitive? It’s cyclical, man. 1 Quote
Hsker4life Posted March 5 Posted March 5 1 hour ago, DJB said: Remember when we traded Wyatt for a late pick? How did that turn out? Not saying Bates is the next Wyatt but man it’s rough to see decent oline guys go Remember when we drafted Matt Milano in the 5th round? How did that turn out? Not saying whoever we draft with this pick is the next Milano, but man it’s good to acquire draft picks for backup players. Quote
SoCal Deek Posted March 5 Posted March 5 2 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: Maybe so but the cap problem was of Beane's own making. Can we cut Beane instead? That’s true but he doesn’t count against the Cap. So far I see very little drama or controversy here. It’s inevitable! Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Pretty safe to say Chicago is only team in NFL who would’ve given up a 5th rounder for Bates. There’s seriously people upset about trading a guy making $4m per year who got demoted to 35 snaps last year? Maybe Beane can get pick #9 from the Bears for Diggs. Quote
Spiderweb Posted March 5 Posted March 5 4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: That’s true but he doesn’t count against the Cap. So far I see very little drama or controversy here. It’s inevitable! All to save a pitance? 1.4 mil? Garbage move.... Quote
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 5 Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: All to save a pitance? 1.4 mil? Garbage move.... If that 5th gets used to move up in the 1st or 2nd round to get a receiver this board is in love with, no one is going to care about Bates. 1 Quote
Xerx Posted March 5 Posted March 5 "We need to get younger" Beane trades a 27yr old career back-up for a 5th round pick "No, Not that way" 2 Quote
SoCal Deek Posted March 5 Posted March 5 3 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: All to save a pitance? 1.4 mil? Garbage move.... And you would make what move instead? There’s a great thread that shows the overall roster laid out with the players all listed in groups (starters, reserves, under contract, etc). Go take a look at that one. As both you and I have said, Beane has tied his own hands. There will be two overarching themes to Off Season 2024: (1) a lot of turnover of non-starters and (2) some creative wizardry of contract negotiations with the starters that remain. Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 5 Posted March 5 9 minutes ago, Spiderweb said: All to save a pitance? 1.4 mil? Garbage move.... Let it play out. Moving on from him now saves $5.4M against the 2025 cap next year. Which means that Beane now has a tad more flexibility to sign an impactful player and add a void year with no net loss to dead cap next season. That could be the difference between signing a Leonard Floyd type player as opposed to a low level EDGE. 2 Quote
Sestak4ever Posted March 5 Posted March 5 This may have been a mutually agreed upon move. They help Bates by putting him in a place where he could start. Sort of helps all parties involved. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.